Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Approved - Utility markers

2019-11-10 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Michael,

This is a good point and sorry for this time of answer.
I didn't mention position=* in the proposal but as a reviewed and
established practice for pipeline, easily extendable to other fields of
knowledge, it's ok to keep it on the marker.

I'll update the wiki shortly with it.

All the best

François

Le lun. 28 oct. 2019 à 20:14, Michael Brandtner via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> should position=* be kept when retagging pipeline markers to the new
> scheme? If yes, then this tag should be added to the wiki documentation.
>
> Michael
>
> Am So., Okt. 27, 2019 at 18:35 schrieb François Lacombe
> :
> Hi all,
>
> Voting of Utility markers proposal is now over and it was approved with 46
> yes out of 47 votes.
> This is a great participation level for such kind of topic.
> Thank you to anyone who spent time to improve this proposal and finally
> gives his vote.
>
> Cleanup has already began, wiki will be up to date in a couple of days.
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:marker
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:utility
>
> Feel free to add examples or raise concerns about particular situations in
> appropriate Talk pages
> Hope this will also help further milestone, highway/railway markers
> mapping and development.
>
> All the best
>
> François Lacombe
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - Approved - Utility markers

2019-10-28 Thread Michael Brandtner via Tagging
Hi,
should position=* be kept when retagging pipeline markers to the new scheme? If 
yes, then this tag should be added to the wiki documentation.
Michael  
 
  Am So., Okt. 27, 2019 at 18:35 schrieb François 
Lacombe:   Hi all,
Voting of Utility markers proposal is now over and it was approved with 46 yes 
out of 47 votes.This is a great participation level for such kind of topic.
Thank you to anyone who spent time to improve this proposal and finally gives 
his vote.
Cleanup has already began, wiki will be up to date in a couple of 
days.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:markerhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:utility
Feel free to add examples or raise concerns about particular situations in 
appropriate Talk pagesHope this will also help further milestone, 
highway/railway markers mapping and development.

All the best
François Lacombe___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
  
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


[Tagging] Feature proposal - Approved - Utility markers

2019-10-27 Thread François Lacombe
Hi all,

Voting of Utility markers proposal is now over and it was approved with 46
yes out of 47 votes.
This is a great participation level for such kind of topic.
Thank you to anyone who spent time to improve this proposal and finally
gives his vote.

Cleanup has already began, wiki will be up to date in a couple of days.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:marker
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:utility

Feel free to add examples or raise concerns about particular situations in
appropriate Talk pages
Hope this will also help further milestone, highway/railway markers mapping
and development.

All the best

François Lacombe
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging