Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - stamping_point
Am 11.07.2011 22:27, schrieb Zsolt Bertalan: > I amended the page, but meanwhile someone made an interesting comment, > that we shouldn't use this on a building, because there is no building > built for that. I answered the following: > > "Interesting point. I think the tag is not describing the building as a > whole, but only a feature. Also I don't like to tag nodes that are part > of a(n) way/area. And where do you put the node with the tag if the > stamp is inside the building, e.g. in a pub under the counter? Putting > it on the entrance would be misleading, because it implies that the > stamp is on the wall, so you can use it outside opening hours. On the > other hand how can I render the stamp if the house already have another > icon? Would tagging a node solve this problem? I think the render would > not look nice. Herrbert74" If you tag it as node at the real position (e.g within a building first level, 30 of the stairs on the left), it is OK. But at least a level=* and a description=* would be appropriate. > What is your opinion? > Does anyone know, how this would be rendered (in my own rendering for > hikers) if the building has already say, an amenity=pub tag (and I > already render pubs with icons)? What would be the best solution? It is the renderes choice which icon to render maybe it has an own extra icon but I would not count on it. cu fly P.S.: Your are right about site relations. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - stamping_point
I amended the page, but meanwhile someone made an interesting comment, that we shouldn't use this on a building, because there is no building built for that. I answered the following: "Interesting point. I think the tag is not describing the building as a whole, but only a feature. Also I don't like to tag nodes that are part of a(n) way/area. And where do you put the node with the tag if the stamp is inside the building, e.g. in a pub under the counter? Putting it on the entrance would be misleading, because it implies that the stamp is on the wall, so you can use it outside opening hours. On the other hand how can I render the stamp if the house already have another icon? Would tagging a node solve this problem? I think the render would not look nice. Herrbert74" What is your opinion? Does anyone know, how this would be rendered (in my own rendering for hikers) if the building has already say, an amenity=pub tag (and I already render pubs with icons)? What would be the best solution? Zsolt Herrbert74 On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Zsolt Bertalan wrote: > OK, I will do that! > > I think site relation is not a good example for a relation, because I'd add > the tag to a member of the relation, but it's applicable for a building with > a yard mapped with a multipolygon relation. > > Zsolt > Herrbert74 > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, fly wrote: > >> Am 11.07.2011 16:00, schrieb Zsolt Bertalan: >> > Hi! >> > >> > I changed the status of this proposal to Proposed only today, although >> > the RFC was sent in February. Is it OK to start the voting in a few days >> > (hours)? >> > Luckily the history of the proposal wasn't inactive, I received some >> > comments on the Discussion Page. I answered them there and modified the >> > proposal a little bit. Anyone with better english skills than me is >> > welcome to clean up the page. >> > If I don't receive any more comments, I send out a Request for Voting. >> >> Please, have a statement that stamping_point=yes can be used with other >> tourism=* as long as the location is not known better. >> >> Relations (like site) should also be valid case. >> >> At least with pilgim stamp points are often located in >> tourism=attraction tagged building/sites. >> >> Thanks >> fly >> >> >> ___ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - stamping_point
OK, I will do that! I think site relation is not a good example for a relation, because I'd add the tag to a member of the relation, but it's applicable for a building with a yard mapped with a multipolygon relation. Zsolt Herrbert74 On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, fly wrote: > Am 11.07.2011 16:00, schrieb Zsolt Bertalan: > > Hi! > > > > I changed the status of this proposal to Proposed only today, although > > the RFC was sent in February. Is it OK to start the voting in a few days > > (hours)? > > Luckily the history of the proposal wasn't inactive, I received some > > comments on the Discussion Page. I answered them there and modified the > > proposal a little bit. Anyone with better english skills than me is > > welcome to clean up the page. > > If I don't receive any more comments, I send out a Request for Voting. > > Please, have a statement that stamping_point=yes can be used with other > tourism=* as long as the location is not known better. > > Relations (like site) should also be valid case. > > At least with pilgim stamp points are often located in > tourism=attraction tagged building/sites. > > Thanks > fly > > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - stamping_point
Am 11.07.2011 16:00, schrieb Zsolt Bertalan: > Hi! > > I changed the status of this proposal to Proposed only today, although > the RFC was sent in February. Is it OK to start the voting in a few days > (hours)? > Luckily the history of the proposal wasn't inactive, I received some > comments on the Discussion Page. I answered them there and modified the > proposal a little bit. Anyone with better english skills than me is > welcome to clean up the page. > If I don't receive any more comments, I send out a Request for Voting. Please, have a statement that stamping_point=yes can be used with other tourism=* as long as the location is not known better. Relations (like site) should also be valid case. At least with pilgim stamp points are often located in tourism=attraction tagged building/sites. Thanks fly ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - stamping_point
Hi! I changed the status of this proposal to Proposed only today, although the RFC was sent in February. Is it OK to start the voting in a few days (hours)? Luckily the history of the proposal wasn't inactive, I received some comments on the Discussion Page. I answered them there and modified the proposal a little bit. Anyone with better english skills than me is welcome to clean up the page. If I don't receive any more comments, I send out a Request for Voting. regards Zsolt Herrbert74 -- Forwarded message -- From: Zsolt Bertalan Date: Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:34 AM Subject: Feature Proposal - RFC - stamping_point To: tagging@openstreetmap.org http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/stamping_point ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
