Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-27 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/2/27 Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com:
 Again, I'm fine with not creating another tag (like
 driveway=pipestem), but the next best thing I can think of is to do
 something like operator=123-129 Suburb Street (as that's what's
 shown on signs, ugly for parsing), or perhaps I could create a
 pipestem relation showing which houses are responsible for the road
 :).


I think that if these roads have characteristics/properties that
distinct them from the rest of the highways (like maintenance, maybe
access, ownership) which all roads of this type (pipestem) share in
your area, IMHO you suggested the better solution by proposing a new
tag driveway=pipeway. Operator is not suitable (it is always different
and therefor you couldn't evaluate it the same way) and relations seem
just another way to tag the same thing in a more complex way (on the
other hand adding different detail, so it might be an additional way).

cheers,
Martin

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-27 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/2/27 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
 tag driveway=pipeway.

sorry, of course this should read pipestem ;-)

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-27 Thread Steve Doerr
On a side-note, this meaning of 'pipestem' seems to be completely 
unknown to the Oxford English Dictionary, despite the fact that they 
revised this whole section of the alphabet ('pi-mesic' to 'pleating') 
for an update released in June 2006. Perhaps someone should tell them 
about it?


--
Steve


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


[Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-26 Thread Josh Doe
How do we differentiate between driveways and pipestems? Pipestems are
common in planned residential developments (at least in the US), where
a number of houses are located off a pipestem, each with their own
driveways. Maintenance of the pipestem is the responsibility of all
the homeowners off that particular pipestem. Pipestems aren't named
roads, so highway=residential doesn't make since, but I'm not sure if
I should use service=driveway both for the pipestems and for the
individual driveways. I suppose I could use operator=*, but since it's
just a collection of homeowners that typically don't have a name, I'm
not sure what to put here.

I don't want to invent a new tag if I don't have to, but I'm not sure
how to use existing tags to make this distinction.

Perhaps I could use highway=service, service=driveway, and
driveway=pipestem? Suggestions are welcome!

Thanks,
-Josh

[1]: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:service%3Ddriveway#Pipestems

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-26 Thread Brad Neuhauser
I'm not clear why this is all that different from an alley which might have
garages along it.  Creating a new tag here seems like overkill to me.
Couldn't you just use one of the service values (driveway, alley, or just
keep it at service), and add access tag, operator, etc.?  I know taxonomies
are fun, but don't see how pipestem adds much information.

Brad

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote:

 How do we differentiate between driveways and pipestems? Pipestems are
 common in planned residential developments (at least in the US), where
 a number of houses are located off a pipestem, each with their own
 driveways. Maintenance of the pipestem is the responsibility of all
 the homeowners off that particular pipestem. Pipestems aren't named
 roads, so highway=residential doesn't make since, but I'm not sure if
 I should use service=driveway both for the pipestems and for the
 individual driveways. I suppose I could use operator=*, but since it's
 just a collection of homeowners that typically don't have a name, I'm
 not sure what to put here.

 I don't want to invent a new tag if I don't have to, but I'm not sure
 how to use existing tags to make this distinction.

 Perhaps I could use highway=service, service=driveway, and
 driveway=pipestem? Suggestions are welcome!

 Thanks,
 -Josh

 [1]:
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:service%3Ddriveway#Pipestems

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-26 Thread Josh Doe
I need some way to differentiate between pipestems and driveways,
because the distinction between the two are very important for my
community.

Operator and access tags are useful, but they won't help me
differentiate between the two.

I'm not proposing to create a new tag that becomes standard. If I have
to I'll just use my_namespace=pipestem, but I'd rather use something
that could possibly be reused by someone else.

Unless someone suggests otherwise, I'll use highway=service,
service=driveway, and driveway=pipestem. But don't worry, I don't plan
to create a proposal for this, just using it for my AOI. :)

-Josh

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Brad Neuhauser
brad.neuhau...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm not clear why this is all that different from an alley which might have
 garages along it.  Creating a new tag here seems like overkill to me.
 Couldn't you just use one of the service values (driveway, alley, or just
 keep it at service), and add access tag, operator, etc.?  I know taxonomies
 are fun, but don't see how pipestem adds much information.

 Brad

 On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote:

 How do we differentiate between driveways and pipestems? Pipestems are
 common in planned residential developments (at least in the US), where
 a number of houses are located off a pipestem, each with their own
 driveways. Maintenance of the pipestem is the responsibility of all
 the homeowners off that particular pipestem. Pipestems aren't named
 roads, so highway=residential doesn't make since, but I'm not sure if
 I should use service=driveway both for the pipestems and for the
 individual driveways. I suppose I could use operator=*, but since it's
 just a collection of homeowners that typically don't have a name, I'm
 not sure what to put here.

 I don't want to invent a new tag if I don't have to, but I'm not sure
 how to use existing tags to make this distinction.

 Perhaps I could use highway=service, service=driveway, and
 driveway=pipestem? Suggestions are welcome!

 Thanks,
 -Josh

 [1]:
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:service%3Ddriveway#Pipestems

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging



___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-26 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/2/26 Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com:
 I'm not proposing to create a new tag that becomes standard. If I have
 to I'll just use my_namespace=pipestem, but I'd rather use something
 that could possibly be reused by someone else.


if it becomes reused by someone else (which would be good IMHO) it is
kind of standard.

 Unless someone suggests otherwise, I'll use highway=service,
 service=driveway, and driveway=pipestem. But don't worry, I don't plan
 to create a proposal for this, just using it for my AOI. :)


I'd say that this is fine. If you want you could document this in the
wiki (e.g. on a proposal page or if already in wider use on a key page
e.g. for service=driveway), so it gets more probable that other
mappers follow this scheme for similar cases.

cheers,
Martin

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-26 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:52:39 -0500
Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote:

 How do we differentiate between driveways and pipestems? Pipestems are
 common in planned residential developments (at least in the US), where
 a number of houses are located off a pipestem, each with their own
 driveways.
A right-of-way in australia - the right of way is restricted to the
owners and guests


I live on one, and we chose highway=service for it.

I'm not sure why you need to differentiate between this and a driveway,
but I think the driveway is mistagged if marked highway=service.
Do you mark the driveways access=private?

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-26 Thread Nathan Edgars II

On 2/26/2011 5:27 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:

I'm not sure why you need to differentiate between this and a driveway,
but I think the driveway is mistagged if marked highway=service.
Do you mark the driveways access=private?


The standard for driveways is in fact highway=service service=driveway 
access=private. (I don't know what happens if a rail spur - railway=rail 
service=spur - runs along a driveway :))


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-26 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/2/26 Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net:
 I'm not sure why you need to differentiate between this and a driveway,
 but I think the driveway is mistagged if marked highway=service.


It is quite common to do so (currently there are 171710 ways tagged
with service=driveway, which is a quarter of all values for the key
service and 2nd position after parking_aisle).

cheers,
Martin

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-26 Thread Alan Mintz

At 2011-02-26 14:35, Nathan Edgars II wrote:

On 2/26/2011 5:27 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:

I'm not sure why you need to differentiate between this and a driveway,
but I think the driveway is mistagged if marked highway=service.
Do you mark the driveways access=private?


The standard for driveways is in fact highway=service service=driveway 
access=private.


I don't feel the need to tag access=* on a driveway. It seems that, 
wherever I draw a driveway, it's access is the same as the property to 
which it leads, by definition. A standard residential house's driveway (in 
the US) is on the private property of the homeowner. A driveway leading to 
a park is usually on the park property and any restrictions are usually 
posted at/near it's junction with the road, said restrictions applying to 
the park, not just the driveway.


I think the pipestem thing is more detail than most people are likely to 
want to map, unless you are micro-mapping for the purpose of facilities 
management of a particular housing development. Where it is exaggerated 
(hundreds of meters), I tag it highway=service + access=private (usually 
with evidence from a posted sign at the intersection with the public road), 
and then tag the individual driveways off of it as highway=service + 
service=driveway (if I draw them at all).


--
Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-26 Thread Nathan Edgars II
West Virginia actually maintains and numbers these pipestems under the 
Home Access Route Program (example: 
http://www.gribblenation.com/wvpics/subs/939on11n-kerr.jpg)
Before they were given to the state in the 1990s, they were orphan 
roads that were open to the public but not maintained by any 
government: http://www.legis.state.wv.us/WVCODE/Code.cfm?chap=17art=2C


I'm not sure if this is exactly the same thing.

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-26 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:04:23 -0800
Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:

  I tag it highway=service + access=private (usually 
 with evidence from a posted sign at the intersection with the public
 road), 
I'd favour access=permissive rather than private. 

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-26 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:04:23 -0800
Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:

 The standard for driveways is in fact highway=service
 service=driveway access=private.  
 
 I don't feel the need to tag access=* on a driveway. It seems that, 
 wherever I draw a driveway, it's access is the same as the property
 to which it leads, by definition. A standard residential house's
 driveway (in the US) is on the private property of the homeowner. A
 driveway leading to a park is usually on the park property and any
 restrictions are usually posted at/near it's junction with the road,
 said restrictions applying to the park, not just the driveway.

access= ?? is exactly why I feel that highway=service is the wrong
thing for a driveway.
It does not inherit the access defaults of the highway=service. I was
going to describe the defaults of my driveway differently to your way,
but the conclusion is the same - the access rights are different.
If you wish to map highway=service service=driveway then I would still
have hgv (literally, in my case) using the driveway with a standard
router.
My property adjoins an industrial complex. heavy goods vehicles
(up to B-doubles in this case) are not wanted on the service road to the
2 houses and the office area, but have a more suitable entrance with
access to a turning area.

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-26 Thread Josh Doe
I agree about the access issue, by default for a driveway (or sub-type
pipestem :) access should be private, as it's solely intended for the
homeowner(s) to drive and/or park their vehicles. As Elizabeth points
out, yes, it does require routers to check the sub-type to see if it's
a driveway or not, but I don't think this is an issue, especially
since driveways (or at least the definition I'm familiar with in the
US) have no outlet and strictly lead to houses.

And in terms of detail, yes, this is definitely micro-mapping, and
true in part it has to do with facilities management. I'm very
interested in micro-mapping, but I understand I am a small minority.
However there's plenty of other crazy stuff I see mapped and tagged,
so I don't think I'm being ridiculous.

Regards,
-Josh

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
 At 2011-02-26 14:35, Nathan Edgars II wrote:

 On 2/26/2011 5:27 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:

 I'm not sure why you need to differentiate between this and a driveway,
 but I think the driveway is mistagged if marked highway=service.
 Do you mark the driveways access=private?

 The standard for driveways is in fact highway=service service=driveway
 access=private.

 I don't feel the need to tag access=* on a driveway. It seems that, wherever
 I draw a driveway, it's access is the same as the property to which it
 leads, by definition. A standard residential house's driveway (in the US) is
 on the private property of the homeowner. A driveway leading to a park is
 usually on the park property and any restrictions are usually posted at/near
 it's junction with the road, said restrictions applying to the park, not
 just the driveway.

 I think the pipestem thing is more detail than most people are likely to
 want to map, unless you are micro-mapping for the purpose of facilities
 management of a particular housing development. Where it is exaggerated
 (hundreds of meters), I tag it highway=service + access=private (usually
 with evidence from a posted sign at the intersection with the public road),
 and then tag the individual driveways off of it as highway=service +
 service=driveway (if I draw them at all).

 --
 Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net


 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-26 Thread Josh Doe
Interesting, this is a different definition of pipestem than what I'm
familiar with. Pipestems as I know them (at least in Fairfax County,
Virginia, USA), are a shared driveway leading to two or more houses.
The houses on a pipestem are jointly responsible for maintaining the
road themselves. Maybe there's another term used elsewhere, but I'm
not aware of it.

Again, I'm fine with not creating another tag (like
driveway=pipestem), but the next best thing I can think of is to do
something like operator=123-129 Suburb Street (as that's what's
shown on signs, ugly for parsing), or perhaps I could create a
pipestem relation showing which houses are responsible for the road
:).

Thanks for all the feedback,
-Josh

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
 West Virginia actually maintains and numbers these pipestems under the
 Home Access Route Program (example:
 http://www.gribblenation.com/wvpics/subs/939on11n-kerr.jpg)
 Before they were given to the state in the 1990s, they were orphan roads
 that were open to the public but not maintained by any government:
 http://www.legis.state.wv.us/WVCODE/Code.cfm?chap=17art=2C

 I'm not sure if this is exactly the same thing.

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-26 Thread Nathan Edgars II

On 2/26/2011 8:01 PM, Josh Doe wrote:

Interesting, this is a different definition of pipestem than what I'm
familiar with. Pipestems as I know them (at least in Fairfax County,
Virginia, USA), are a shared driveway leading to two or more houses.
The houses on a pipestem are jointly responsible for maintaining the
road themselves.


I think that was the case with these roads until the state took them 
over. See the law's references to property owners dedicating right-of-way.


On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com  wrote:

West Virginia actually maintains and numbers these pipestems under the
Home Access Route Program (example:
http://www.gribblenation.com/wvpics/subs/939on11n-kerr.jpg)
Before they were given to the state in the 1990s, they were orphan roads
that were open to the public but not maintained by any government:
http://www.legis.state.wv.us/WVCODE/Code.cfm?chap=17art=2C

I'm not sure if this is exactly the same thing.


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] How to tag pipestems (shared driveways)

2011-02-26 Thread Steve Bennett
 Perhaps I could use highway=service, service=driveway, and
 driveway=pipestem? Suggestions are welcome!

Creating a new tag here seems like overkill to me.

I know taxonomies are fun, but don't see how pipestem adds much information.

the distinction between the two are very important for my
community.

The proposal seems exactly right, given these factors. For people who
don't care about the distinction, highway=service, service=driveway
will do fine. For those that do, add the extra information. This sort
of tagging should be encouraged, rather than what is normally
proposed, something like highway=service, service=pipestem.

Steve

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging