Re: [Tagging] Residential roads

2010-10-02 Thread Colin Smale

 On 02/10/2010 02:07, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:

2010/9/30 Colin Smalecolin.sm...@xs4all.nl:

Also important for routing systems is the practical speed for a road.
Many country roads may have a high legal limit, but for reasons including
width and curviness you may never achieve anywhere near that in practice.


this depends on the vehicle and the expertise of the driver...

Absolutely, and many other factors as well. But the point is that it has 
no relation to the legal maximum speed, which is the current definition 
of the maxspeed tag except that maxspeed should probably be the upper 
limit of the speed assumed by routing programs. The fact that a speed 
for routing purposes cannot be fairly expressed as a single figure is 
no reason to deny its importance. If it is not explicitly contained in 
the data, it might be derivable somehow, but even that will depend on 
the presence of certain base data.


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Residential roads

2010-09-30 Thread Richard Welty

 On 9/30/10 4:52 AM, Pieren wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 5:45 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com 
mailto:stevag...@gmail.com wrote:


Probably the simplest distinction is that various programs treat
unclassified as a fast country road (eg, 100+kph), and residential
as a quiet residential street (eg, 50-60kph). Take your pick.


Could you provide some examples of such various programs because 
this distinction is new for me.
So it means that a slow speed road serving industrial or retail areas 
are for you residential roads ? My definition of residential road is 
following what says the wiki for roads accessing or around 
residential areas, indepently of the speed limits.

that's the correct approach. explicit, accurate maxspeed values are best.

we as mappers have no control over how the different routing systems
select default speeds. we should not be making assumptions about that.

richard

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Residential roads

2010-09-30 Thread Colin Smale

 we as mappers have no control over how the different routing systems
 select default speeds. we should not be making assumptions about that.

Also important for routing systems is the practical speed for a road.
Many country roads may have a high legal limit, but for reasons including
width and curviness you may never achieve anywhere near that in practice.
So maybe an additional explicit tag for the effective speed for routing
purposes? That might also stop people getting directed up goat tracks:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1315762/White-van-man-airlifted-safety-satnav-sends-mountain.html

I think this link was also posted earlier.


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Residential roads

2010-09-30 Thread Richard Welty

 On 9/30/10 7:38 AM, Colin Smale wrote:

we as mappers have no control over how the different routing systems
select default speeds. we should not be making assumptions about that.

Also important for routing systems is the practical speed for a road.
Many country roads may have a high legal limit, but for reasons including
width and curviness you may never achieve anywhere near that in practice.
i have at times wanted this, when i've seen a road that was defaulted to 
55mph

but wasn't practical to travel at more than 40 due to broken pavement, for
example.

richard


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Residential roads

2010-09-30 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
  On 9/30/10 7:38 AM, Colin Smale wrote:
 Also important for routing systems is the practical speed for a road.
 Many country roads may have a high legal limit, but for reasons including
 width and curviness you may never achieve anywhere near that in practice.

 i have at times wanted this, when i've seen a road that was defaulted to
 55mph
 but wasn't practical to travel at more than 40 due to broken pavement, for
 example.

For curves the government uses a ball bank indicator to measure the
safe speed (which then goes on advisory speed limit signs). But I
don't know of any defined method of giving a comfortable speed for
rough pavement. There are some brick roads around here than are hell
at any speed (especially on a bike, despite being signed bike
routes...).

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Residential roads

2010-09-29 Thread Steve Bennett
Hi Stephen,
  You've highlighted two grey areas I often struggle with.

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
 First, I've recently done a couple of roads in the country. They're
 either dead end roads or form some sort of web but are not connecting
 roads in the sense that they go anywhere else in particular.  One
 example is about three or four km long, and has about 5 farms and a
 few smaller properties on it. How would you tag that?  It's not what I
 would call a residential area, though obviously a few people do live
 there.

Probably the simplest distinction is that various programs treat
unclassified as a fast country road (eg, 100+kph), and residential
as a quiet residential street (eg, 50-60kph). Take your pick.

 The other extreme is lanes in places like retirement villages and
 caravan parks.  These are definitely residential areas, but are not
 full blown roads, usually only one lane wide and private roads, not
 publicly owned. Often with little or no curbing, etc.  It feels wrong
 to just be marking them as residential.

There's a continuum with these. Sometimes what looks like a retirement
village or something is just a housing development, just like any
other street but all built in the same style, by one construction
company.

If the houses have public street addresses (eg, 46 Jones St), I make
them highway=residential. If they're addressed within the context of
the development/retirement village/caravan park (eg, lot 15, Jones
Park), I'd use something like highway=service.

You do have to be careful not to see a narrow street and immediately
leap at highway=service.

Steve

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging