Balaitous wrote 1. Re: Proposition for a classification of path (Balaitous) > Also, the proposed path types would classify any path that ends in a cul-de-sac as the least-used and least-maintained category, which isn't necessarily the case. > > When I say "cul-de-sac" I refer to paths that go nowhere, like this : > > At the beginning, there look good, but there are more and more bad, and > at the end there simply disappear ! > > I have corrected : > "This path can be end in cul de sac without any POI." I dont see why you > would make a definition like this, since theres a path grade 1 - 5 option.For > instance in the situation of Cirque de Gavarnie, > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.6973&lon=-0.0017&zoom=14&layers=M theres > a path with cul du sac, since a hiker wont climb up, but the path will be > well maintaned. A path with a cul dus sac with POI ! And there will be more.I > would tag it grade 5 without hesitation. But theres one point I like to ad to > this discussion if you want to build a new order. What about the quality of a > track usable for less valid or invalid people and thats not just the pavement > or the lack of it but also about space. >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
