Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-22 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-12-19 20:53 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:

 I am happy with current rendering, and I want to keep that when the names
 are stripped. The OSM mapnik layer will hopefully add the amin_name to the
 border labels, so that Gutenbrunn will show up as Gemeinde Gutenbrunn
 again, or as Gutenbrunn (Gemeinde) or Gemeinde: Gutenbrunn or similar.



What about Marktgemeinde Gutenbrunn (that's what they call themselves on
their official homepage)?




 How would you like the Berlin border labeled? Well, I guess just Berlin,
 because there's only one administrative unit with that name, and everybody
 in the world knows what Berlin is.



no, most people in the world don't know about the administrative details
and would think that Berlin is a city/municipality and not a Land
(something similar to a state)

cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-22 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 22.12.2014 10:32, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
 What about Marktgemeinde Gutenbrunn (that's what they call themselves on
 their official homepage)?

No, that's advertising language, they are showing off their market right in
order to impress their visitors and to attract investors.

-- 
Friedrich K. Volkmann   http://www.volki.at/
Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-21 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:

 In the UK designation= is in wide usage for this.

+1

I think designation=* fits perfectly with what is intended by the OP's
proposal.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-19 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 18.12.2014 17:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
 yes, legally it's Einheitsgemeinde, but that's maybe not a title...
 The Land has the title Stadtstaat, and of course it's also
 Bundeshauptstadt.
 
 Which one should go into admin_title and why?

Have a look at Gemeinde Gutenbrunn:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/406819

Zoom to the borders and see how they are labeled. It reads Gemeinde
Gutenbrunn, Gemeinde Bärnkopf, and so on.

In the Talk-AT mailinglist, someone raised the issue that Gemeinde
Gutenbrunn is not the correct name. It's actually just Gutenbrunn. But
imagine the borders just labeled Gutenbrunn. You won't know whether it's a
commune, or a district, or a state, etc. Some borders are state border,
district border, and commune border at the same time. They are labeled with
the names of state, district, and commune. You won't know which is which.

I am happy with current rendering, and I want to keep that when the names
are stripped. The OSM mapnik layer will hopefully add the amin_name to the
border labels, so that Gutenbrunn will show up as Gemeinde Gutenbrunn
again, or as Gutenbrunn (Gemeinde) or Gemeinde: Gutenbrunn or similar.

How would you like the Berlin border labeled? Well, I guess just Berlin,
because there's only one administrative unit with that name, and everybody
in the world knows what Berlin is. This is really an exceptional case. But
imagine Brandenburg would be called Land Berlin. Then you would probably
want to distinguish the city of Berlin from the state of Berlin.

-- 
Friedrich K. Volkmann   http://www.volki.at/
Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-18 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 17.12.2014 22:08, Andreas Goss wrote:
 So what do you do with Berlin? State? City? Stadtstaat (Citystate)?

As far as I can see, Berlin is a Bundesland and a Gemeinde. So you should
have one boundary relation for each level. If you decide to use a boundary
relation for the top level only, admin_title=Bundesland seems correct
(matching the admin_level), although semicolon notation may also be possible.

-- 
Friedrich K. Volkmann   http://www.volki.at/
Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-18 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-12-17 20:11 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:

 On 17.12.2014 16:56, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
  isn't this already covered by name and its variants?
  e.g.
  name=Bezirk Zwettl
  short_name=Zwettl
 
  or
  name=Zwettl
  official_name=Bezirk Zwettl ?

 No, because the official name is just Zwettl. But in most cases when you
 talk about Bezirk Zwettl (district of Zwettl), you say Bezirk Zwettl, in
 order to make it clear that you are not talking about the city of Zwettl.



actually for this example you're wrong, the official name is
Zwettl-Niederösterreich, you can see this for instance here:
http://www.statistik.at/blickgem/gemDetail.do?gemnr=32530
or in this law:
http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/LgblNO/LRNI_2011122/LRNI_2011122.pdf




  And another question, is this also aiming at city titles, e.g.
  Universitätsstadt, Freie und Hansestadt?

 No. There are plenty of these bogus titles for each city.



I don't think bogus is the correct term here, have a look at the
constitution of the Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg, Art. 1 (name):
http://www.hamburg.de/contentblob/1604280/data/verfassung-2009.pdf

cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-18 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-12-18 13:52 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:

 On 17.12.2014 22:08, Andreas Goss wrote:
  So what do you do with Berlin? State? City? Stadtstaat (Citystate)?



the official name AFAIK is Land Berlin



 As far as I can see, Berlin is a Bundesland and a Gemeinde.



The term Bundesland is of mostly colloquial use, the official term is
Land, so it is Land Berlin for the admin level 4 entity. At the same
time, it is also Stadt (city), and the respective public responsibilities
are not separated (the precise legal term is Einheitsgemeinde). You can
see this in Art. 1 of its constitution:
http://gesetze.berlin.de/default.aspx?vpath=bibdata%2Fges%2FBlnVerf%2Fcont%2FBlnVerf.A1.htm
I had some years ago proposed to have both entities mapped in OSM (Land
Berlin and Stadt Berlin, with identical territory), but this was
rejected by the time ;-)

cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-18 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 17.12.2014 23:23, Colin Smale wrote:
 In the UK designation= is in wide usage for this. I don't know if it is
 typically a UK thing (it wouldn't surprise me) but local governments
 sometimes have the right to change their style - for example a civil
 parish can choose autonomously to call itself a community council. It can
 also choose to call itself a town council although I suspect this needs
 cooperation from its parent authority. And a council can become a city
 council basically only through a central decision.

I think that the name of the council does not matter.

 Some districts
 (admin_level=8) have the status of borough. All this doesn't change the
 legal powers and responsibilities of the council, it's all about what they
 are called. There's a lot of snobism involved as well...
 
 I have tried to summarise a tagging scheme for UK local authorities here: 
 
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Csmale/ukboundaries

So far we have destination=* for the UK, official_status=* for Russia, and
name:prefix for other countries. That diversity makes the tags essentially
unusable for applications. It's a pity that every national OSM community
make up their own tags, without caring what others do, as if there were
berlin walls around each country.

Personally I don't care if the key is admin_title=*, designation=*, or
official_status=*. We just should decide for one.

-- 
Friedrich K. Volkmann   http://www.volki.at/
Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-18 Thread Colin Smale

On 2014-12-18 14:42, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:


On 17.12.2014 23:23, Colin Smale wrote:

In the UK designation= is in wide usage for this. I don't know if it 
is typically a UK thing (it wouldn't surprise me) but local 
governments sometimes have the right to change their style - for 
example a civil parish can choose autonomously to call itself a 
community council. It can also choose to call itself a town 
council although I suspect this needs cooperation from its parent 
authority. And a council can become a city council basically only 
through a central decision.


I think that the name of the council does not matter.


Exactly, that's my point. A simple civil parish and Salisbury City 
Council are administratively equivalent and are both tagged 
designation=civil_parish. This tagging should not, however tempting or 
logical some people might think it, be based on the name, but on the 
legal/constitutional status.




Some districts (admin_level=8) have the status of borough. All 
this doesn't change the legal powers and responsibilities of the 
council, it's all about what they are called. There's a lot of 
snobism involved as well... I have tried to summarise a tagging scheme 
for UK local authorities here: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Csmale/ukboundaries [1]


So far we have destination=* for the UK, official_status=* for Russia, 
and
name:prefix for other countries. That diversity makes the tags 
essentially
unusable for applications. It's a pity that every national OSM 
community

make up their own tags, without caring what others do, as if there were
berlin walls around each country.


Finding the right balance between universal, world-wide tagging and 
local conventions (at whatever level) is one of the biggest challenges 
we have. Usually any attempt at formalisation gets either shot down in 
flames by a vociferous minority or ignored by the silent majority.




Personally I don't care if the key is admin_title=*, designation=*, or
official_status=*. We just should decide for one.


+1 from me, good luck with getting the consensus, and then getting the 
loser to retag everything...


Links:
--
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Csmale/ukboundaries

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-18 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 18.12.2014 14:00, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
 the official name AFAIK is Land Berlin

Sounds good. So it's admin_title=Land, then.

 As far as I can see, Berlin is a Bundesland and a Gemeinde.
 
 The term Bundesland is of mostly colloquial use, the official term is
 Land, so it is Land Berlin for the admin level 4 entity. At the same
 time, it is also Stadt (city), and the respective public responsibilities
 are not separated (the precise legal term is Einheitsgemeinde). You can
 see this in Art. 1 of its constitution:
 http://gesetze.berlin.de/default.aspx?vpath=bibdata%2Fges%2FBlnVerf%2Fcont%2FBlnVerf.A1.htm

AFAIK, Stadt only means some privilege (Stadtrecht), it's not an
administrative devision.

 I had some years ago proposed to have both entities mapped in OSM (Land
 Berlin and Stadt Berlin, with identical territory), but this was rejected
 by the time ;-)

It's not too late to change it, but it's probably not that important, except
for generating lists of Gemeinden. Berlin will be missing in those lists.

-- 
Friedrich K. Volkmann   http://www.volki.at/
Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-18 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-12-18 16:42 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:

  As far as I can see, Berlin is a Bundesland and a Gemeinde.
 
  The term Bundesland is of mostly colloquial use, the official term is
  Land, so it is Land Berlin for the admin level 4 entity. At the same
  time, it is also Stadt (city), and the respective public
 responsibilities
  are not separated (the precise legal term is Einheitsgemeinde). You can
  see this in Art. 1 of its constitution:
 
 http://gesetze.berlin.de/default.aspx?vpath=bibdata%2Fges%2FBlnVerf%2Fcont%2FBlnVerf.A1.htm

 AFAIK, Stadt only means some privilege (Stadtrecht), it's not an
 administrative devision.




In Berlin there is no such thing like a Gemeinde there are the Bezirke
divided into Ortsteile, and while the first do correspond roughly to
Landkreisen (regarding the number of inhabitants) they don't have the power
(they are indeed not even Kommunen, the term is
Selbstverwaltungseinheiten Berlins ohne Rechtspersönlichkeit).
Berlin, Hamburg and Bremen are also called Stadtstaat. Between the
Gemeinde and the Land there is typically the Landkreis or Kreisfreie
Stadt (and in some cases the Regierungsbezirk), have a look at this
illustration for an overview of the German administrative system:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Administrative_Gliederung_Deutschlands.svg

Looking at Berlin in OSM, I have also found this tag which seems to have
the same intentions as your proposal and is used more than 50k times:
name:prefix=Land und Kreisfreie Stadt
http://taginfo.osm.org/keys/name%3Aprefix

cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-18 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 18.12.2014 16:44, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
 In Berlin there is no such thing like a Gemeinde there are the Bezirke
 divided into Ortsteile, and while the first do correspond roughly to
 Landkreisen (regarding the number of inhabitants) they don't have the power
 (they are indeed not even Kommunen, the term is
 Selbstverwaltungseinheiten Berlins ohne Rechtspersönlichkeit).
 Berlin, Hamburg and Bremen are also called Stadtstaat. Between the
 Gemeinde and the Land there is typically the Landkreis or Kreisfreie
 Stadt (and in some cases the Regierungsbezirk), have a look at this
 illustration for an overview of the German administrative system:
 http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Administrative_Gliederung_Deutschlands.svg

Whatever. I am sure that there is some correct name of the administrative
division type. It is up to the german community to find out.

 Looking at Berlin in OSM, I have also found this tag which seems to have the
 same intentions as your proposal and is used more than 50k times:
 name:prefix=Land und Kreisfreie Stadt
 http://taginfo.osm.org/keys/name%3Aprefix

This has some serious drawbacks, see the rationale in my proposal. That's
why I started the proposal in the first place.

-- 
Friedrich K. Volkmann   http://www.volki.at/
Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-17 Thread Brad Neuhauser
Sorry, the German examples don't mean much to me. Do the examples below
show what you're proposing?

name=Chicago, admin_title=city, admin_level...
name=California, admin_title=state, admin_level

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at wrote:

 This is about a new attribute for administrative devisions.

 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/admin_title

 --
 Friedrich K. Volkmann   http://www.volki.at/
 Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-17 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-12-17 16:25 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:

 This is about a new attribute for administrative devisions.

 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/admin_title



isn't this already covered by name and its variants?
e.g.
name=Bezirk Zwettl
short_name=Zwettl

or
name=Zwettl
official_name=Bezirk Zwettl ?

And another question, is this also aiming at city titles, e.g.
Universitätsstadt, Freie und Hansestadt?

cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-17 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 17.12.2014 16:56, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
 isn't this already covered by name and its variants?
 e.g.
 name=Bezirk Zwettl
 short_name=Zwettl
 
 or
 name=Zwettl
 official_name=Bezirk Zwettl ?

No, because the official name is just Zwettl. But in most cases when you
talk about Bezirk Zwettl (district of Zwettl), you say Bezirk Zwettl, in
order to make it clear that you are not talking about the city of Zwettl.

 And another question, is this also aiming at city titles, e.g.
 Universitätsstadt, Freie und Hansestadt?

No. There are plenty of these bogus titles for each city.

-- 
Friedrich K. Volkmann   http://www.volki.at/
Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-17 Thread Andreas Goss

So what do you do with Berlin? State? City? Stadtstaat (Citystate)?
__
openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88‎


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - admin_title=*

2014-12-17 Thread Colin Smale
 

In the UK designation= is in wide usage for this. I don't know if it
is typically a UK thing (it wouldn't surprise me) but local governments
sometimes have the right to change their style - for example a civil
parish can choose autonomously to call itself a community council. It
can also choose to call itself a town council although I suspect this
needs cooperation from its parent authority. And a council can become a
city council basically only through a central decision. Some
districts (admin_level=8) have the status of borough. All this
doesn't change the legal powers and responsibilities of the council,
it's all about what they are called. There's a lot of snobism involved
as well... 

I have tried to summarise a tagging scheme for UK local authorities
here: 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Csmale/ukboundaries 

It is not official in any way, they are only my own notes at present -
based on current usage and my thoughts to keep my work on these
boundaries consistent. 

I expect the system in Germany is a bit less variable, although the
different Länder seem to have very different local government
structures. 

Colin 

On 2014-12-17 16:25, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: 

 This is about a new attribute for administrative devisions.
 
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/admin_title [1]
 

Links:
--
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/admin_title
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging