Re: [Tagging] Map showing proposed ferry routes & terminals

[Andrew Davidson]

Entirely up to the designer of the renderer.

On Thu, 17 May 2018 07:45 Graeme Fitzpatrick,  wrote:

> Thanks everybody for confirming what I thought & offering a possible
> alternative - I'll pass that on to the mapper concerned.
>
> Just to clarify though?
>
> If things are tagged as "Proposed", they will then disappear off the map
> completely, or will still be visible "greyed out" or something?
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
> On 16 May 2018 at 22:38, Martin Koppenhoefer 
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> sent from a phone
>>
>> > On 16. May 2018, at 09:47, Mateusz Konieczny 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > many official plans never result in anything changing on the ground.
>>
>>
>> somehow official plans always change something, because people react
>> accordingly, but it doesn’t mean that something will be built or that it is
>> easy to detect the influence of a proposal.
>>
>> cheers,
>> Martin
>> ___
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Map showing proposed ferry routes & terminals

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

Thanks everybody for confirming what I thought & offering a possible
alternative - I'll pass that on to the mapper concerned.

Just to clarify though?

If things are tagged as "Proposed", they will then disappear off the map
completely, or will still be visible "greyed out" or something?

Thanks

Graeme

On 16 May 2018 at 22:38, Martin Koppenhoefer  wrote:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 16. May 2018, at 09:47, Mateusz Konieczny 
> wrote:
> >
> > many official plans never result in anything changing on the ground.
>
>
> somehow official plans always change something, because people react
> accordingly, but it doesn’t mean that something will be built or that it is
> easy to detect the influence of a proposal.
>
> cheers,
> Martin
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Map showing proposed ferry routes & terminals

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 16. May 2018, at 09:47, Mateusz Konieczny  wrote:
> 
> many official plans never result in anything changing on the ground.


somehow official plans always change something, because people react 
accordingly, but it doesn’t mean that something will be built or that it is 
easy to detect the influence of a proposal.

cheers,
Martin 
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Map showing proposed ferry routes & terminals

[Mateusz Konieczny]

16. May 2018 01:05 by graemefi...@gmail.com :


> Am I correct in telling them that it should only be on the map if it's on the 
> ground (or water in this case!), so please delete everything & add it as it 
> actually get's built / becomes operational?




 I agree with that policy, but some people really like to map proposed features.




In that case please use proposed prefix and add source for claim that it is 
proposed.




Source is necessary as some people like adding their personal project or ideas 
and even

many official plans never result in anything changing on the ground.

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Map showing proposed ferry routes & terminals

[Warin]

On 16/05/18 11:01, Andrew Davidson wrote:

On 16/5/18 10:05, Andrew Harvey wrote:
It's likely a contentious issue, but I will point out the lifecycle 
prefix
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix which can be 
used to

map any kind of proposed feature, eg. proposed:amenity=ferry_terminal.


+1

+1


But I'm going to guess that the mapper will be unhappy when all of the 
proposed wharfs and routes disappear from the map.


Better than total removal.
And most maps then shows what exist for present use rather than 
directing people to things that are not there.


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Map showing proposed ferry routes & terminals

[Andrew Davidson]

On 16/5/18 10:05, Andrew Harvey wrote:

It's likely a contentious issue, but I will point out the lifecycle prefix
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix which can be used to
map any kind of proposed feature, eg. proposed:amenity=ferry_terminal.


+1

But I'm going to guess that the mapper will be unhappy when all of the 
proposed wharfs and routes disappear from the map.


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging