Re: [Tagging] What's the default `access` value? | Re: amenity=place_of_worship | Re: Mapping of indigenous sacred / ceremonial sites
Am Do., 4. Apr. 2019 um 10:53 Uhr schrieb Rory McCann : > I don't think there can be a default *for all types of PoW*. > ... > I think data consumers need to use their heads. ... If you're making a > site to show tourist-y places in > a city, don't include `amenity=place_of_worship` with > `access=adherent(s)/no/private`, and if there's no `access` tag, then > look at the other tags/location and make an educated guess. If you're > making a "Find my local Catholic Church" app, then include > `access=adherents` or a missing `access` tag on a catholic church. exactly, well said! Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] What's the default `access` value? | Re: amenity=place_of_worship | Re: Mapping of indigenous sacred / ceremonial sites
On 04/04/2019 09:52, Rory McCann wrote: So what's the default `access` for `amenity=place_of_worship`? I don't think there can be a default *for all types of PoW*. Spot on - and actually that applies to plenty of other things within OSM too (for example - highway=track). Anyone consuming OSM (or in fact any other) data needs to sanity check it themselves based on all sorts of other info (including where it is). Best Regards, Andy ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] What's the default `access` value? | Re: amenity=place_of_worship | Re: Mapping of indigenous sacred / ceremonial sites
Apr 4, 2019, 10:52 AM by r...@technomancy.org: > So what's the default `access` for `amenity=place_of_worship`? > > I don't think there can be a default *for all types of PoW*. > > * `access=permissive` is the default for Catholic church facilities in > Ireland, but `access=private` for Catholic friaries & monasteries. > > * `access=adherent(s)` for some Muslim facilities in Morocco (right?) > According to materials that I remember checking of all mosques in Morocco only Hassan II Mosque and Tin Mal Mosque are open for non-Muslims. > > * `access=permissive` for Mormon genealogy facilities, but > `access=adherent(s)` to the Mormon temple facility (right?) > > I think data consumers need to use their heads. If you're making a > cycling routing engine, use a default `bicycle=no` for > `highway=motorway`. If you're making a site to show tourist-y places in > a city, don't include `amenity=place_of_worship` with > `access=adherent(s)/no/private`, and if there's no `access` tag, then > look at the other tags/location and make an educated guess. If you're > making a "Find my local Catholic Church" app, then include > `access=adherents` or a missing `access` tag on a catholic church. > I agree, though tagging some (even obvious for locals) access info may be helpful. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
