Re: ELSE for JSTL

2003-02-08 Thread Shawn Bayern
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:

> Why not:
> 
> 
>   
> foo
>   
>   
> bar
>   
> 
> 
> ?? Just to make it a bit nicer in xml look and feel.
> 
> Which of course is synonymous to choose I think :)

Yes, exactly.  The , , and  tags simply
provide a more generalized syntax since they allow multiple conditions.

During the JSR-52 EG's deliberations, most of the members felt that there
were definite advantages to a simple  tag unencumbered by multi-way
conditions; no matter where a  tag appears, its body is included if
'test' is true and excluded otherwise.  Either way, evaluation continues
after the closing  tag.  Particularly for large and complex pages,
this kind of simplicity -- for, after all, a task that is one of JSTL's
simplest functions -- was considered desirable.

Note also that XSLT faced an identical problem (or at least a very similar
one) and came to the same conclusions.

-- 
Shawn Bayern
"JSTL in Action"   http://www.manning.com/bayern


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: ELSE for JSTL

2003-02-08 Thread Henri Yandell


On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Mirko Nasato wrote:

> Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Ivonne Barrantes wrote:
> >
> >
> >>? When we'll be able to enjoy the beneficts of our beloved  "ELSE" for JSTL ?
> >>
> >>I know we have the  tag, but it takes more code lines then a
> >>simple 
> >>
> >>What do you think about it Shawn?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Shawn mentioned it in a post a week back or so I think. Unsure if it was
> >on Dev or Users. Basically the problem with  is that there's no
> >container tag:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >so it's probably a pain to implement.
> >
> >
> Why not something like:
>
> 
>   foo
>   
>   bar
>   
> 

Why not:


  
foo
  
  
bar
  


?? Just to make it a bit nicer in xml look and feel.

Which of course is synonymous to choose I think :)

Hen


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: ELSE for JSTL

2003-02-08 Thread Mirko Nasato
Henri Yandell wrote:


On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Ivonne Barrantes wrote:
 

? When we'll be able to enjoy the beneficts of our beloved  "ELSE" for JSTL ?

I know we have the  tag, but it takes more code lines then a
simple 

What do you think about it Shawn?
   


Shawn mentioned it in a post a week back or so I think. Unsure if it was
on Dev or Users. Basically the problem with  is that there's no
container tag:






so it's probably a pain to implement.
 

Why not something like:


 foo
 
 bar
 


Regards.

\mirko



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: ELSE for JSTL

2003-02-07 Thread Henri Yandell


On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Ivonne Barrantes wrote:

>
> ¿ When we'll be able to enjoy the beneficts of our beloved  "ELSE" for JSTL ?
>
> I know we have the  tag, but it takes more code lines then a
> simple 
>
> What do you think about it Shawn?

Shawn mentioned it in a post a week back or so I think. Unsure if it was
on Dev or Users. Basically the problem with  is that there's no
container tag:






so it's probably a pain to implement.

However, it's probably worth trying outside of JSTL to see if it's
possible :) Any interest in working on an else tag? Either one that worked
with  or had its own  tag would be a good way to show the
JSTL JSR group that such a thing is possible.

I'll add it to the list I've started compiling of useful tags to code to
compliment the JSTL.

Hen


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




ELSE for JSTL

2003-02-07 Thread Ivonne Barrantes

¿ When we'll be able to enjoy the beneficts of our beloved  "ELSE" for JSTL ?

I know we have the  tag, but it takes more code lines then a 
simple 

What do you think about it Shawn?



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]