Re: [Tails-dev] Tor 0.2.2.x package in 0.13
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:39:33PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: >> Therefore, I think we should build our own binary >> packages from weasel's debian-tor-0.2.2.39-1 Git tag. I can do that. This won't be needed, "thanks" to DSA-2548-1: https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2012/msg00190.html ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
Re: [Tails-dev] Tor 0.2.2.x package in 0.13
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:39:33PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > I think we need to ship Tor 0.2.2.39 in Tails 0.13, > but apparently weasel only pushes updated packages of 0.2.2.x to > stable-proposed-updates these days, and this has not been done for > 0.2.2.38-39 yet. Therefore, I think we should build our own binary > packages from weasel's debian-tor-0.2.2.39-1 Git tag. I can do that. > > Thoughts? Please proceed. :) -- Ague pgpXUNQkCqTtS.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
[Tails-dev] Tor 0.2.2.x package in 0.13
Hi, I think we need to ship Tor 0.2.2.39 in Tails 0.13, but apparently weasel only pushes updated packages of 0.2.2.x to stable-proposed-updates these days, and this has not been done for 0.2.2.38-39 yet. Therefore, I think we should build our own binary packages from weasel's debian-tor-0.2.2.39-1 Git tag. I can do that. Thoughts? Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
