Re: [Tails-dev] Please review merge bugfix/i2p_hidden_mode
On 20/01/13 17:06, intrigeri wrote: Hi, please review and merge bugfix/i2p_hidden_mode. ticket: todo/i2p_hidden_mode candidate for 0.17 With my WAN hat on, may I ask whether someone reviewed that branch or feels like reviewing it? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
Re: [Tails-dev] Please review merge bugfix/fix_default_iceweasel_spelling_language
On 20/01/13 17:08, intrigeri wrote: Hi, in Tails 0.16, the default spelling dictionary in iceweasel is the French (Luxembourg) one -- who knows how iceweasel chooses. This branch fixes this by using en_US by default, and localizing the dictionary for languages supported by our custom branding extension. ticket: todo/fix_default_iceweasel_spelling_language candidate for 0.17 Cheers, With my WAN hat on, may I ask whether someone reviewed that branch or feels like reviewing it? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
Re: [Tails-dev] Icedove modifications
hi, since I had much more urgent stuff to do yesterday, I've rebased our Icedove patchset on top of current sid's one, uploaded the resulting packages to the feature-icedove APT suite, updated the feature/icedove Git branch so that it builds and uses these packages. I don't really intend to go on, but well, I hope this eases things. Note that the patchset was imported into the tails gbp-pq topic, to allow the Debian package to build and generally be consistent with how the icedove maintainers deal with their patches on top of upstream. Don't hesitate asking me if some Git or packaging workflow is unclear :) The ticket was updated quite a bit along the way: https://tails.boum.org/todo/Return_of_Icedove__63__/ cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
Re: [Tails-dev] TorBirdy: first impressions
Hi, Jacob Appelbaum wrote (22 Jun 2012 01:00:01 GMT) : What do we need to fix or do for you to ship TorBirdy? We need a way to configure TorBirdy so that it does *not* disable the account creation wizard -- currently fails with TorBirdy has disabled Thunderbird's auto-configuration wizard to protect your anonymity. Is it possible to a preference setting to do so? Rationale: our patchset secure account creation patchset should take care of most, if not all, of the issues highlighted in Tagnaq's paper. In case someone wants to review / test / have a look, here's the code: repo:git://labs.riseup.net/tails_icedove.git branch: tails/master-10.x patches: debian/patches/tails/* Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
[Tails-dev] torsocks upstream ticket: add stream isolation support to torsocks
Hi, just sharing in case you are interested: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8053 Cheers, adrelanos ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
[Tails-dev] Please review merge feature/vidalia-0.2.21
Hi, candidate for 0.17, no code change, only an updated Vidalia pushed to the feature-vidalia-0.2.21 APT suite, so the merge will only have to take place at the APT level. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
[Tails-dev] Off-topic section in forum
Hi, quite a number of people, in the Tails forum, ask questions not strictly related to Tails, but rather to Tor or general anonimity/privacy topics. They're almost always told to discuss such topics somewhere else, because the project has few developers, and they can't handle all of them and Tails development too. I agree. But IMHO, saying please go talk somewhere else may mistakenly sound like we don't like newbies here to them, and maybe discourage them from using Tails. Instead, we should provide something like an off-topic section where they can discuss about privacy and anonimity, and where competent and volunteering users can answer to them. Of course, users should be given appropriate warnings about it: - Tails developers do not directly support this section - do not blindly trust what anyone says, but ask for sources - do not feed the trolls - and so on... To not waste work, this could be implemented when the new forum is adopted (https://tails.boum.org/todo/improve_the_forum/). Let me know what you think of it. Greetings Alessandro ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
