[Tails-dev] Tor Monitor: don't show duplicate streams with the same destination in the same circuit
Hi, sajolidawrote: > Done in #10183. > After checking how this could be done, I'm really unsure. I currently display the stream Tor has. Deduplicating streams would mean to create another list of streams, which would not ma to Tor streams. Then, how should we update the status of the stream group? A stream (with the same destination) could be "Succeeded" while another is "Sentconnect" and another "Closing". This proposal means we should invent another concept, that Tor dosn't provide, and that makes few sense. I checked also what vidalia does, and it does not deduplicate streams with the same destination. So I don't think this should be a requirement to replace Vidalia. Cheers ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
[Tails-dev] Reminder: help porting Windows camouflage to GNOME 3.14
Hi everybody! Long story short: we send a call for participation on porting "Windows camouflage" to GNOME 3.14. We got not serious answer. If nobody volunteers to do the job, next Tails major version will *not* include camouflage mode. Find below the full call. Cheers * * * Call for participation! --- Are you into GNOME development and want to participate to Tails? Do you want to improve your GTK or GNOME Shell theming skills while supporting users needing privacy and stealth? Consider porting the "Windows camouflage" of Tails to GNOME 3.14. What is the Windows camouflage? Tails documentation reads "if you are using a computer in public you may want to avoid attracting unwanted attention by changing the way Tails looks into something that resembles Microsoft Windows 8." This is what we call the "Windows camouflage". Why is it useful? - We got reports that users have been arrested while using a privacy-enhancing distribution because their screen looked very different from others, which raised suspicion. It's why a Windows camouflage has been added to Tails. What should be done? Current Tails is based on GNOME 3.8 in "Fallback" mode. We are currently upgrading Tails on top of the upcoming version on Debian ("Jessie") which is based on GNOME 3.14. The Windows camouflage should be upgraded to the last version of GTK and ported from GNOME Panel to GNOME shell. That includes GTK and GNOME Shell theming through CSS as well as writing a custom GNOME Shell extension. Why do we need you? --- The team currently working on Tails is very busy and decided to focus on the core or the upgrade rather than on the Windows camouflage. We currently plan to go ahead with the initial Tails Jessie release even if the Windows camouflage is missing. However, we would love to ship a proper Windows camouflage and think it's a good occasion for you to give a hand. We'll provide support to anybody volunteering and work together on integrating the new theme to upcoming Tails Jessie snapshots. Where should you start? --- Please read https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/update_camouflage_for_jessie/, then write to tails-dev@boum.org. This is a public mailing list: https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev/. Please subscribe! ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
[Tails-dev] Bogons/Iptables - add 224.0.0.0/4 and (some) others, please!
Please add to iptables the list of Bogons: https://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/bogon-bn-nonagg.txt 2 or 3 of them are already there, but missing are some important ones which need blocking like 224.0.0.0/4 ! There are others but some may or may not block legit Tor nodes (added here for reference): https://www.team-cymru.org/bogon-reference-http.html ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] jenkins.t.b.o and nightly.t.b.o downtime
Hi, On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 04:36:11PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > bertagaz wrote (05 Sep 2015 14:52:22 GMT) : > > > Note to those who use it in a script, the link to the latest ISO of a > > build has changed a bit from > > http://nightly.tails.boum.org/$BUILD/latest.iso > > to > > http://nightly.tails.boum.org/$BUILD/lastSuccessful/archive/latest.iso > > I'd appreciate it there were HTTP redirect rules added to keep > compatibility with already published URLs. Where can I get such a list of published URLs? FYI the people from reproducible.d.n were contacted and updated their cronjob. bert. ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] [Review] Adding laptops which don't shutdown properly
Alan wrote (10 Sep 2015 22:16:41 GMT) : > sajolidawrote: >> > But I was wondering how relevant it is to add computers there, as that >> > list might never ends, wrt. to UEFI hardware? >> >> I think it's fine. > In the current state of Tails, it is impossible for an hardware boot > in UEFI mode to shutdown properly. :) This was the conclusion I was ready to draw from empirical experience until a few weeks ago, and then I've seen one system (some Lenovo laptop/tablet hybrid, I think it was a Yoga one) shutdown properly, to my great surprise, and I doubt it was started in legacy BIOS mode. I've just emailed that system's owner to confirm. Cheers, -- intrigeri ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] jenkins.t.b.o and nightly.t.b.o downtime
bertagaz wrote (05 Sep 2015 14:52:22 GMT) : > And now nightly.t.b.o is back online too. yay \o/ > Note to those who use it in a script, the link to the latest ISO of a > build has changed a bit from > http://nightly.tails.boum.org/$BUILD/latest.iso > to > http://nightly.tails.boum.org/$BUILD/lastSuccessful/archive/latest.iso I'd appreciate it there were HTTP redirect rules added to keep compatibility with already published URLs. I suspect that adding it would take less time/energy than arguing about it ;) cheers, -- intrigeri ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] Reminder: help porting Windows camouflage to GNOME 3.14
emmapeel wrote (14 Sep 2015 18:54:25 GMT) : > Maybe we can spam around after posting the call? The call was published 8 months ago: https://tails.boum.org/news/windows_camouflage_jessie/ Cheers, -- intrigeri ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] Tor Monitor build fails
Hi, Sascha Steinbisswrote: > I can build everything perfectly directly after cloning: > > [vagrant@debian-8:~] $ git clone https://github.com/satta/tor-monitor.git > Cloning into 'tor-monitor'... > remote: Counting objects: 153, done. > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (74/74), done. > remote: Total 153 (delta 78), reused 145 (delta 70), pack-reused 0 > Receiving objects: 100% (153/153), 32.71 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done. > Resolving deltas: 100% (78/78), done. > Checking connectivity... done. > [vagrant@debian-8:~] $ cd tor-monitor > [vagrant@debian-8:~/tor-monitor] $ gbp buildpackage --git-pbuilder -uc -us > gbp:info: tor-monitor_0.1.orig.tar.gz does not exist, creating from > 'upstream/0.1' > Building with cowbuilder for distribution sid > I: using cowbuilder as pbuilder > […] > > As you can see, the tarball is created if it does not exist. Does this work > for you? > No, it doesn't work under Tails (based on wheezy), but I tried under jessie and the build starts... but then I hit: $ gbp buildpackage --git-dist=jessie --git-arch=i386 --git-pbuilder -uc -us gbp:info: Building with pbuilder for jessie Building with pbuilder for distribution jessie, architecture i386 I: using pbuilder as pbuilder dpkg-buildpackage: source package tor-monitor dpkg-buildpackage: source version 0.1-1 dpkg-buildpackage: source distribution unstable dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Sascha Steinbiss dpkg-source --before-build tor-monitor-packaging fakeroot debian/rules clean dh clean --with python3 --buildsystem=pybuild dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=pybuild debian/rules override_dh_auto_clean make[1]: Entering directory 'XXX/tor-monitor-packaging' rm -f po/tormonitor.pot rm -rf build make[1]: Leaving directory 'XXX/tor-monitor-packaging' dh_clean -O--buildsystem=pybuild dpkg-source -b tor-monitor-packaging dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)' dpkg-source: info: building tor-monitor using existing ./tor-monitor_0.1.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: warning: file tor-monitor-packaging/tormonitor.desktop has no final newline (either original or modified version) dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are: tor-monitor-packaging/tormonitor.desktop dpkg-source: error: aborting due to unexpected upstream changes, see /tmp/tor-monitor_0.1-1.diff.3aQP6Q dpkg-source: info: you can integrate the local changes with dpkg-source --commit dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b tor-monitor-packaging gave error exit status 2 gbp:error: 'git-pbuilder -uc -us' failed: it exited with 2 Thanks for your support, Cheers ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] Article OnionMail an anonymous mail server running on Tor
To use OnionMail in TAILS you need only this: https://onionmail.info/network/wizard.tar.gz http://louhlbgyupgktsw7.onion/network/wizard.tar.gz Don't use this: https://github.com/onionmail/onionmail-wizard This is the right sources updated: https://github.com/onionmail/TAILS-wizard It can't be a Debian official package because is only a python script to configure automaticaly claws-mail. The source code is in the package. It download by wget the server list using tor network and GPG to verify. Then show a list of available server and ouse RQUS method to create a new user. Extract an empty claws-mail profile, then configure it with new new mail account. Generate a new PGP key pair, then send it to the keyserver. If you want to create an OnionMail server you need the Debian package onionmail etc The wizard can be used on: * TAILS * Parrot OS Functions: * Get the server list by OnionMail directory * Verify list via GPG. * Configure claws-mail. * Generate GPG keypair. Other functions: * Experimental: Add desktop icon (gnome gnome). * Experimental: Increase random entropy and generates Radio interference for tempest (using AutoRave). The source codes on github is the OnionMail server 1.8.0. Now we are working to the next version (1.9.0). I repeat the question two months ago: It makes sense to renew the script to work with graphics? The answer? 29 Public OnionMail hidden services, 43 other onionmail Hidden services, over 7000 user on 4 hidden services managed directly by the project. Il 13/09/2015 13:42, u ha scritto: > Hi, > > thank you for your proposal. > > In order to consider shipping software with Tails, we first require that > it is packaged for Debian and part of the official Debian archives. > > Once this is done, besides security implications, we still also need to > discuss if a software is useful and usable for an average Tails user. > > Please also note that this software has already been proposed here and > some questions were asked but not answered: > https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2014-June/006143.html > https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2014-June/006086.html > https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2014-June/006108.html > > Cheers! > u. > ___ > Tails-dev mailing list > Tails-dev@boum.org > https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev > To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to > tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org. ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
[Tails-dev] An idea
Hello, I had another idea : and what about Tails for smartphones ? because smartphones are small computers and can also be compromised by bad software. Have a good week ! Gilles ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] Reminder: help porting Windows camouflage to GNOME 3.14
Alan: > Hi everybody! > > Long story short: we send a call for participation on porting > "Windows camouflage" to GNOME 3.14. We got not serious answer. If > nobody volunteers to do the job, next Tails major version will *not* > include camouflage mode. > Just today a user complained about the icons not being sized accordingly, and making it easy to spot as a fake. I think a lot of users use the Windows Camouflage, is a good feature for your Tails to go unnoticed. It would be a pity that is left. Maybe we can spam around after posting the call? Tweet and that? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] An idea
gil.guil...@free.fr: > Hello, > > I had another idea : and what about Tails for smartphones ? because > smartphones are small computers and can also be compromised by bad software. > See https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6064 Please have a look at the documentation/bug tracker before sending suggestions, as many things have been already discussed... Thanks for your understanding. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.