[Tails-dev] Porting more scripts from bash to python

[GoodCrypto Support]

 We are about to have some time to port more scripts from bash to python.

Sajolida kindly let us know the git part looked right. We'd prefer to know 
these scripts are what you're looking for before we do more. If delays in 
feedback are normal, just let us know.

Cheers

Nan 


GoodCrypto - Warning: Anyone could have read this message. Use encryption, it 
works.
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to 
tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.

Re: [Tails-dev] i2p-0.9.25~Tails-2.3

[anonym]

anonym:
> pr0ng:

>> I believe I've repackaged the 0.9.25 to 'conform' to the Tails layout
>> correctly and will be rebuilding the Tails dev branch with 0.9.25
>> over the next couple of days when I get another block of time, likely
>> mid-week ~ 20, 21st?
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Although I am able to explode the .deb from i2p (.25) and repack as
>> required I am not yet fully up-to-speed with how I 'release' this after
>> testing, so I will refer to zzz for some advice on that matter and if
>> you have any pointers on this, please do shout! :)
> 
> [...]
> 
> However, now it seems we'll have a non-official package for Tails. I
> wonder, why can we not use the Debian Jessie ones? That makes me think
> that Tails, rather, should adapted so the normal deb8 packages can be
> installed. Could you please elaborate?

So, I have built a Tails image with the 0.9.25-1~deb8u+1 packages from
deb.i2p2.no and it seems to work just fine. So what is the purpose of
repackaging them into 0.9.25~Tails-2.3 to "conform" to Tails? It doesn't
seem necessary on first glance.

Cheers!

___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to 
tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.