[Tails-dev] Cron /usr/local/bin/tails-website-last-month-stats '/var/log/nginx/tails.boum.org'
Boots in January: 713228 Downloads of the OpenPGP signature in January: 3536 ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] Announcement: Roadmap:YYYYQN labels
intrigeri (2023-02-02): > - the QN milestones > >These milestones were never fully integrated into our workflow and >tooling, and they don't work for some of our teams, so they are now >obsoleted by the new labels, which should hopefully work for >every team. > >I'll migrate the issues and MRs that have these milestones to the >new labels (either this week or next week). After which I'll delete >the QN milestones. Done, so: >I suppose some teams will have to accordingly update links to >filtered boards and similar. Sorry for the inconvenience. Cheers, -- intrigeri ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
[Tails-dev] Announcement: Roadmap:YYYYQN labels
Hi, After a discussion with Disoj and boyska, we'll now track our roadmap using quarterly *labels* called Roadmap:QN: https://gitlab.tails.boum.org/groups/tails/-/labels?subscribed=&search=roadmap%3A These labels replace: - the yearly labels we were using to track our roadmap so far (e.g. ~2022 and ~2023) I'm going to leave alone the issues with these labels: that's useful historical info, and these issues will get another QN label if they land on our updated roadmap. - the QN milestones These milestones were never fully integrated into our workflow and tooling, and they don't work for some of our teams, so they are now obsoleted by the new labels, which should hopefully work for every team. I'll migrate the issues and MRs that have these milestones to the new labels (either this week or next week). After which I'll delete the QN milestones. I suppose some teams will have to accordingly update links to filtered boards and similar. Sorry for the inconvenience. Cheers, -- intrigeri ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] xfce, second option graphic interface in tails?
On 2/1/23 16:54, David A. Wheeler wrote: I suspect even people with stronger computers would appreciate snappier response & more resources for "actual work". If it involves removing extensions or other services by default, that's less running code to worry about. I haven't checked anything out in Tails specifically, but there are various guides that might be useful: * https://linuxhint.com/memory_optimize_gnome/ * https://askubuntu.com/questions/1266498/gnome-shell-is-taking-a-lot-of-ram Thanks for this research! Their most practical suggestion is to "trim extension", which we did. By the way, we have regular QA tests to check that Tails is usable with 2GB of RAM. While I'm all for saving resources, I don't think it's realistic to bring down the requirement to 1GB. The best we can do is to try hard to not bump the requirement to 3GB. -- boyska ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
