Re: [Tails-dev] Call for testing 0.14~rc2
08/11/12 16:36, Ague Mill wrote:
anonym:
What procedure do you suggest for packages that we don't build
ourselves, like live-config{-sysvinit}? The APT documentation [1] only
covers the case where packages are built and an appropriate .changes
file is generated.
Should I try to manually write a .changes file, e.g. by adapting the
upstream one, removing references to other packages like live-config-doc
etc.?
Or should I build the packages? What about all these irrelevant packages
(like live-config-doc) then? Upload them too?
The main difference of using our APT repository versus
`chroot_local-packages` is that packages in the former won't
automatically be installed. So there is no reason to exclude binary
packages. They might come in handy later (binary packages containing
debug symbols, for example).
Sure, but I was thinking about bloat. But I guess that's not really
important.
You can write a .changes manually, but it might be easier to use the
changestool(1) command that is shipped in the reprepro package.
Rebuilding the package is another fine option unless the build
ecosystem has changed too much in the meantime.
If the whole thing feels complicated, just put it in
`chroot_local-packages` and we'll deal with the rest with 0.15.
I'll stick with `chroot_local-packages` for these (and the bundled)
packages for the 0.14 release.
Cheers!
___
tails-dev mailing list
tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
Re: [Tails-dev] Call for testing 0.14~rc2
07/11/12 18:10, intrigeri wrote:
Note for the one who manages the release: we need to make sure the
final ISO does not get the latest live-config (3.0.9-1): it has
basically nothing useful for us, and it migrates to new paths brought
by live-boot 3.0~b7, which we're not ready for yet (details:
todo/newer_live-boot).
I'll put live-config{-sysvinit} 3.0.8-1, both which worked well in
0.14~rc1 and ~rc2, in config/chroot_local-packages. Unless there is some
other suggestion (APT repo?).
Cheers!
___
tails-dev mailing list
tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
Re: [Tails-dev] Call for testing 0.14~rc2
06/11/12 15:49, intrigeri wrote: anonym wrote (30 Oct 2012 00:35:39 GMT) : https://tails.boum.org/news/test_0.14-rc2/ Regression: todo/fix_VirtualBox_modules_build_for_486 Weird, I was pretty sure I had tested this worked when submitting the multikernel feature for review. IMHO this isn't a blocker (perhaps not even an issue at all?) for 0.14 since I doubt anyone wants to subject themselves to running Tails inside a virtual machine on pre-pentium pro hardware. Cheers! ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
Re: [Tails-dev] Call for testing 0.14~rc2
anonym:
07/11/12 18:10, intrigeri wrote:
Note for the one who manages the release: we need to make sure the
final ISO does not get the latest live-config (3.0.9-1): it has
basically nothing useful for us, and it migrates to new paths brought
by live-boot 3.0~b7, which we're not ready for yet (details:
todo/newer_live-boot).
I'll put live-config{-sysvinit} 3.0.8-1, both which worked well in
0.14~rc1 and ~rc2, in config/chroot_local-packages. Unless there is some
other suggestion (APT repo?).
Please use the APT repository from now on. Oh, and don't forget to
upload the source! :)
I intend to remove all packages in the Git repository for 0.15, so
let's just start the good habits now...
--
Ague
pgpzwVV4Hcloc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
tails-dev mailing list
tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
Re: [Tails-dev] Call for testing 0.14~rc2
anonym wrote (08 Nov 2012 13:22:11 GMT) : IMHO this isn't a blocker (perhaps not even an issue at all?) for 0.14 since I doubt anyone wants to subject themselves to running Tails inside a virtual machine on pre-pentium pro hardware. Agreed. I retagged the ticket wishlist, as in patches are welcome. ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
Re: [Tails-dev] Call for testing 0.14~rc2
anonym wrote (08 Nov 2012 13:22:00 GMT) :
I'll put live-config{-sysvinit} 3.0.8-1, both which worked well in
0.14~rc1 and ~rc2, in config/chroot_local-packages. Unless there is
some other suggestion (APT repo?).
Sure, APT repo would be a bit better, but given our oldish live-boot
is in config/chroot_local-packages, I would not mind putting
live-config with it for the sake of consistency.
___
tails-dev mailing list
tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
Re: [Tails-dev] Call for testing 0.14~rc2
Note for the one who manages the release: we need to make sure the final ISO does not get the latest live-config (3.0.9-1): it has basically nothing useful for us, and it migrates to new paths brought by live-boot 3.0~b7, which we're not ready for yet (details: todo/newer_live-boot). ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
Re: [Tails-dev] Call for testing 0.14~rc2
anonym wrote (30 Oct 2012 00:35:39 GMT) : https://tails.boum.org/news/test_0.14-rc2/ Regression: todo/fix_VirtualBox_modules_build_for_486 Weird, I was pretty sure I had tested this worked when submitting the multikernel feature for review. ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
Re: [Tails-dev] Call for testing 0.14~rc2
intrigeri wrote (02 Nov 2012 09:25:29 GMT) : anonym wrote (30 Oct 2012 00:35:39 GMT) : This is the 'official' call for testing the second release candidate of the upcoming version 0.14 of Tails. We might have a regression on bridges support: https://tails.boum.org/forum/Bridge_mode/#comment-b3f81f2e30e71d45e50fd61c86115079 Apparently not. Two of us have seen it work. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
Re: [Tails-dev] Call for testing 0.14~rc2
anonym wrote (30 Oct 2012 00:35:39 GMT) : This is the 'official' call for testing the second release candidate of the upcoming version 0.14 of Tails. We might have a regression on bridges support: https://tails.boum.org/forum/Bridge_mode/#comment-b3f81f2e30e71d45e50fd61c86115079 ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
[Tails-dev] Call for testing 0.14~rc2
Hi! This is the 'official' call for testing the second release candidate of the upcoming version 0.14 of Tails. Please test it and see if all works for you. All information you need for this can be found here: https://tails.boum.org/news/test_0.14-rc2/ Happy testing! ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
