Re: [Tails-dev] Dependencies between persistence options

2012-10-18 Thread intrigeri
hi,

Ague Mill wrote (16 Oct 2012 07:39:43 GMT) :
 Would it be the only option to benefit from such feature? Is there
 other in the radar or on anyone's mind?

AFAICT, no todo/persistence_preset_-_* involves inter-dependencies.

So, I propose we keep the current documentation + simple UI, and
revisit this question later, iff. more persistence presets involving
inter-dependencies appear.

Cheers,
-- 
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
___
tails-dev mailing list
tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev


[Tails-dev] Dependencies between persistence options

2012-10-16 Thread Ague Mill
Hi!

While testing persistent Network Manager connections in the field,
I got bitten by the fact that I had not enabled GNOME Keyring at the
same time.

I hardly see an interesting case where someone would not want to enable
both at the same time. Fixing this user experience issue would, on first
thoughts, require adding support for dependencies between options in
tails-persistence-setup.

This would probably make at least the UI more complex (only example I
can think about is Synaptic).

Would it be the only option to benefit from such feature? Is there other
in the radar or on anyone's mind?

-- 
Ague


pgpshyuz47sJe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
tails-dev mailing list
tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev