Re: [GTALUG] war story: fixing a doc bug can be hard

2019-04-10 Thread o1bigtenor via talk
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 9:28 AM Lennart Sorensen via talk
 wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:27:14PM -0400, Stewart C. Russell via talk wrote:
> > Or get two 16x9s, and flip one vertically. It means your desktop looks a
> > bit O_o, but it works.
>
> I have seen dual 16x10 both turned vertically side by side which was
> a great desktop.  Displayport daisy chaining and a very thin bessel on
> the top made them very nice to setup.
>
Sorry - - - - I went to 4 - 1920 x 1080s.
1 in portrait mode on the left primarily for pdf and text work
3 in landscape mode with 2 stacked in the middle and one on the right.
2 virtual screens stitched together using Xinerama to give a 3940 x
3000 (h x v) setup and yes there is a hole in the display area that
cannot be displayed.
I've been toying with adding a 4k monitor to move this to a larger
area as even with the screen real estate I too often am hampered in
function.

Would suggest at least 2 monitors for any desktop unless you're going
for a 4k and even then I would suggest moving to 2 as well.
You will be surprised how much more you can get done in a period of time!

Regards
---
Talk Mailing List
talk@gtalug.org
https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk


Re: [GTALUG] war story: fixing a doc bug can be hard

2019-04-10 Thread Lennart Sorensen via talk
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:27:14PM -0400, Stewart C. Russell via talk wrote:
> Or get two 16x9s, and flip one vertically. It means your desktop looks a
> bit O_o, but it works.

I have seen dual 16x10 both turned vertically side by side which was
a great desktop.  Displayport daisy chaining and a very thin bessel on
the top made them very nice to setup.

-- 
Len Sorensen
---
Talk Mailing List
talk@gtalug.org
https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk


Re: [GTALUG] war story: fixing a doc bug can be hard

2019-04-09 Thread Stewart C. Russell via talk
On 2019-04-09 1:47 a.m., D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:
> 
> I assume that there is some perl convention for documentation (POD?),
> but I'm not immersed in that culture.

Yeah, POD can make a decent man page without fiddling with groff. But
maybe test the source with sane-width terminals (<= 80 cols) to see if
any reformatting must be made.

Outside groff, there's also the Heirloom Documentation Tools
 which are somehow based
on the original Solaris source. A newer - and frankly glorious - option
is A G Rudi's Neatroff  that's not
only able to typeset bi-di texts but it also handles Opentype ligatures
for efficient handling of Arabic and Farsi.

> |How many people are limited to 80 columns.
> 
> You are being sarcastic, right?

80 column terminals aren't the thing amongst the kids today. Used to
work with folks who'd use full-screen terminals with 8 px fonts, and not
windowed with tmux or anything.

> Buy an UltraHD TV or monitor. 

Or get two 16x9s, and flip one vertically. It means your desktop looks a
bit O_o, but it works.

cheers,
 Stewart

---
Talk Mailing List
talk@gtalug.org
https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk


Re: [GTALUG] war story: fixing a doc bug can be hard

2019-04-08 Thread D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk
| From: Howard Gibson via talk 

|I am working on a Perl app, and I have written a man page for it.  I 
|do not expect to learn groff ever.  I can hack something that seems 
|to work.

You just have to take a sample man page and hack it into your man
page.  Until you need to do something tricky.

I assume that there is some perl convention for documentation (POD?),
but I'm not emersed in that culture.

|How many people are limited to 80 columns.

You are being sarcastic, right?

|Please note that I have problems with wide web pages.  I have my 
|1080p internet screen divided between my browser, my email and my 
|FVWM buttons.  A lot of web pages do not fit in the space I leave 
|them.  I hate them.

HTML has been a battleground between purists who think rendering is
the business of the, uhh, renderer (i.e. on the client side) and the
"designers" who are sure that they need control.  Both have a point
but the wrong side has been winning for 20 years.

Heaven help you if you are vision-impaired or you are trying to view
on an uncommon device or with a minority browser.

Buy an UltraHD TV or monitor.  Or put your buttons on the bottom (I
hate that because the normal aspect ratios are too wide so putting
buttons on the bottom makes that even worse).
---
Talk Mailing List
talk@gtalug.org
https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk


Re: [GTALUG] war story: fixing a doc bug can be hard

2019-04-08 Thread Howard Gibson via talk
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 10:48:59 -0400 (EDT)
"D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk"  wrote:

> I'm reading dnf(8) on Fedora 29 and get irked by the layout of the
> options.
> --disableexcludes=[all|main|],
> --disableexcludepkgs=[all|main|]
> 
> Here's what "man dnf" shows on a terminal that is 80
> columns wide.  Ugly.
> 
>--disableexcludes=[all|main|],   --disableexcludep‐
>kgs=[all|main|]

Hugh,

   I am working on a Perl app, and I have written a man page for it.  I do not 
expect to learn groff ever.  I can hack something that seems to work.  How many 
people are limited to 80 columns.

   Please note that I have problems with wide web pages.   I have my 1080p 
internet screen divided between my browser, my email and my FVWM buttons.  A 
lot of web pages do not fit in the space I leave them.  I hate them.  

-- 
Howard Gibson 
hgib...@eol.ca
jhowardgib...@gmail.com
http://home.eol.ca/~hgibson
---
Talk Mailing List
talk@gtalug.org
https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk