Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2
Le 25.06.23 à 01:02, Brian M. Sperlongano a écrit : nine months later, we see that not only has the work not gotten done, but while we all squabbled away with our pet views about automated editing, we find that we agreed to nothing, and the mapper has quietly continued to add this nonsense tag to the database unabated: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/service=driveway2#chronology I don't remember anyone opposing this mechanical edit but "prefer maproulette/osmose given the number is quite manageable". I don't remember anyone opposing the goal of this mechanical edit (get rid of highwway=service2) if someone has objected, take their opinion into account by exluding the area that this contributor is willing todo for a given lapse of time. in the meantime perform the operation outside the contributor's "manual zone". after "a certain period of time", I think it is reasonable to consider that the objection has been overcome... I even think that this "a certain period of time" has already elapsed : no one is doing this on a case-by-case basis to add a precise value to replace this nonsense, as the chronology graph clearly shows. so, imho, go ahead next week (or 2) unless someone suddenly start obecting and doing it himself case-by-case ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 12:00 PM Tobias Knerr wrote: > On 03.09.22 at 12:52, Simon Poole wrote: > > Anyway IMHO this would seem to make more sense as a maproulette > > challenge or osmose warning than a bulk edit given the number is quite > > manageable and at least some of the objects can probably be mapped to > > one of the "proper" subtypes. > > Perfect is the enemy of good and insisting on doing it manually will > just result in the work not getting done. > > I support doing this as an automated edit. Anyone who wants to set up a > Maproulette task to inspect all ways that were previously tagged > service=driveway2 is welcome to do so. This way, if the task doesn't get > done, at least it won't have prevented the removal of a nonsensical and > confusing value from the database. > And indeed, nine months later, we see that not only has the work not gotten done, but while we all squabbled away with our pet views about automated editing, we find that we agreed to nothing, and the mapper has quietly continued to add this nonsense tag to the database unabated: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/service=driveway2#chronology For the original thread, see: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2022-September/087734.html ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
