Re: [OSM-talk] Steve Coast Joins Microsoft as Principle Architect ofBing Mobile
Am 23.11.2010 18:56, schrieb Maarten Deen: On 23-11-2010 18:52, Jonathan Bennett wrote: On 23/11/2010 17:41, Florian Heer wrote: This is very exciting news. But I could not find any way to make use of that at the moment. So I guess this will be possible in the future as in opposed to now? The announcement was made less than an hour ago -- be patient! It really does feel like hell is going to freeze over. Yes, I'm already shivering of anticipation. Regards, Florian ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Steve Coast Joins Microsoft as Principle Architect ofBing Mobile
--- Mike N. schrieb am Di, 23.11.2010: > WOO HOO! Does anyone have the magic JOSM string for > this? This is very exciting news. But I could not find any way to make use of that at the moment. So I guess this will be possible in the future as in opposed to now? Regards, Florian Heer ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Let's prepare to Fork OSM to a CCBYSA 2.0 continuation
Am 22.08.2010 14:06, schrieb Renaud MICHEL: I have no problem if the data I contributed is copied by [one or multiple] fork (that's why a full history dump has been created, cf http://planet.openstreetmap.org/full-experimental/ ), but as those forks would be different projects I expect the account I created in OSM to be confined in that project. Full ACK, creating a fork under the same license would be covered by the current license anyway. Regards, Florian Heer ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Let's prepare to Fork OSM to a CCBYSA 2.0 continuation
Felix Hartmann schrieb: Instead of just moaning about the Odbl, let's stark working on a future without Odbl. So let's do our best to convince as many mappers as possible to not accept Odbl, reopen registration to people who want to contribute under CCBYSA2.0 terms, and put pressure on OSMF and others to tell them that if they decide to go the Odbl way, they will loose us and also be faced with a fork. I think this is quite interesting: if you do not do as I want, YOU will be responsible. Isn't there a term for this? I think it's "blackmail" This means we have to find a new domain, new servers, and get the usernames/passwords copied so people can login to the CCBYSA 2.0 fork without new registration. I think this could be a real problem. Because I for one do not agree to have my log in credentials copied to any other server. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Templates in the wiki
Pieren schrieb: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Florian Heer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Okay, I see, the Map_Features templates were especially the ones I would not >> like to duplicate. But... is there a way to make them link to language >> specific tag pages? >> >> > > Of course. You have to look in the Map Feature templates and you will > see which parts are defined by variables and which parts are not. > [...] > Thank you very much, I begin to understand the structure, this helps me a lot! Regards, Florian. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Templates in the wiki
Hi! At the moment I try to clean up a bit in the german section of the wiki, that is I try to translate missing pages and synchronize descriptions of tags. During that I came across a lot of templates which is all very nice but it seems that all of them lack a way to control standard texts and internal links via a language argument. Just as an example the template "KeyDescription" has the texts "Description" and "Group" hard-coded in it. I would love it to read "Beschreibung" resp. "Gruppe". Also the template "Map_Features:highway" has, as much as I understand it, no way of changing the key/value-links from the englisch to the language-specific. Now, unfortunately I have not enough knowledge to implement something like that... Could someone please do this, tell me how to do it or point me to a better place to plead my case? Best regards, Florian Heer ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Cycleway VS Track
Karl Guggisberg schrieb: > motorcar=destination(if the signposts read "Zubringerdienst > gestattet" - could be a Helvetism, though) No, in Germany the sign says "Anlieger frei", everyone who has business there may pass. Regards, Florian. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
