Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

2018-04-23 Thread Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com 
Hyperbole? Not at all. It appears in just the one changeset, 57914505, this user created approximately 5,800 untagged nodes. The user was contacted, but does not respond. There are 6-8 new users who just started editing in and around Denver. Circumstantial evidence seems to indicagte they are part of a team in that they all started about the same time, their edits are remarkably similar and they all use the same changeset comment, "adding parking". They don't respond to changeset comments.In this changeset (not Denver), the user created some odd lines. Maybe they mean something, but I don't understand them. If the user replied, it would help to understand the user's edits. This does not look like, "added parking". I'm not hating on new users. I would love for them to join OSM and help map. All I'm saying is that there is a new group of mappers who are creating poor edits and will not communicate.https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=57918111#map=17/33.10686/-117.18078-Original Message-
From: Greg Morgan <dr.kludge...@gmail.com>
Sent: Apr 23, 2018 11:10 AM
To: "ajt1...@gmail.com" <ajt1...@gmail.com>
Cc: Talk <talk@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user	Nakaner-repair

On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:42 PM, ajt1...@gmail.com <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote:
  

  
  
On 23/04/2018 03:40, Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com wrote:

  
  I fully support the efforts of Nakaner.
There are 6-8 users creating a mess in the Denver, Colorado
area.


What'd really help matters would be if local mappers could comment
on changesets by new mappers (both "good" and "bad").  I see that
someone's already commented on a couple of the "thousands of node
additions" that you're presumably referring to here (if that was you
- thanks!), but often locals are by far the best people to say "that
doesn't look correct".  See
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/57929974 for an example near me
by one of the "organised" mappers that alerted GB and DE mappers to
the problems there.


  


See
here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=5538075288#map=19/39.71967/-104.98736Okay so Jack fully supports Nakaner.  He reports that 6-8 users are creating a mess in the Denver, Colorado area.  If we look at the node that Jack is pointing to, then we will see that Victoria1901, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Victoria1901 has made 30 edits.  There are zero blocks against her.   Hyperbole!  Hyperbole!  So she didn't draw in the way.  Honestly, are we going to grow new mappers or not.  We have to let new people fail.  That's part of the learning process.  In the same area is chachafish, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/chachafish.  The user has 124,710 edits.  Is there something that you don't like?  So have I covered two of the 6-8 editors messing up Denver Colorado?Regards,Greg


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

2018-04-23 Thread Pascal Neis 

Hi,

Am 23.04.18 um 09:10 schrieb Greg Morgan:

Okay so Jack fully supports Nakaner.  He reports that 6-8 users are

creating a mess in the Denver, Colorado area.  If we look at the node that
Jack is pointing to, then we will see that Victoria1901,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Victoria1901 has made 30 edits.  There
are zero blocks against her.   Hyperbole!  Hyperbole! 

[...]

She/he has been blocked:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Victoria1901/blocks

Furthermore, her commented changesets are quite usefull:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=7787732

Last but not least, always good to check:
https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?Victoria1901

All the best,
Pascal

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

2018-04-23 Thread Greg Morgan 
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:42 PM, ajt1...@gmail.com 
wrote:

> On 23/04/2018 03:40, Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com wrote:
>
> I fully support the efforts of Nakaner. There are 6-8 users creating a
> mess in the Denver, Colorado area.
>
>
> What'd really help matters would be if local mappers could comment on
> changesets by new mappers (both "good" and "bad").  I see that someone's
> already commented on a couple of the "thousands of node additions" that
> you're presumably referring to here (if that was you - thanks!), but often
> locals are by far the best people to say "that doesn't look correct".  See
> https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/57929974 for an example near me by
> one of the "organised" mappers that alerted GB and DE mappers to the
> problems there.
>
>
> See here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=
> 5538075288#map=19/39.71967/-104.98736
>
> Okay so Jack fully supports Nakaner.  He reports that 6-8 users are
creating a mess in the Denver, Colorado area.  If we look at the node that
Jack is pointing to, then we will see that Victoria1901,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Victoria1901 has made 30 edits.  There
are zero blocks against her.   Hyperbole!  Hyperbole!  So she didn't draw
in the way.  Honestly, are we going to grow new mappers or not.  We have to
let new people fail.  That's part of the learning process.  In the same
area is chachafish, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/chachafish.  The
user has 124,710 edits.  Is there something that you don't like?  So have I
covered two of the 6-8 editors messing up Denver Colorado?

Regards,
Greg
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

2018-04-23 Thread ajt1...@gmail.com 

On 23/04/2018 03:40, Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com wrote:
I fully support the efforts of Nakaner. There are 6-8 users creating a 
mess in the Denver, Colorado area.


What'd really help matters would be if local mappers could comment on 
changesets by new mappers (both "good" and "bad").  I see that someone's 
already commented on a couple of the "thousands of node additions" that 
you're presumably referring to here (if that was you - thanks!), but 
often locals are by far the best people to say "that doesn't look 
correct".  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/57929974 for an 
example near me by one of the "organised" mappers that alerted GB and DE 
mappers to the problems there.




See 
here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=5538075288#map=19/39.71967/-104.98736


That actually appears to be by a mapper using a different process (JOSM) 
but adding things in some of the same areas (LA, Denver) as the other group.


Best Regards,

Andy

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

2018-04-23 Thread Greg Morgan 
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com <
jacknst...@sprynet.com> wrote:

> I fully support the efforts of Nakaner. There are 6-8 users creating a
> mess in the Denver, Colorado area.
>
> See here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=
> 5538075288#map=19/39.71967/-104.98736
>


I cannot tell.  What is it that these six to eight mappers are doing?  Are
these the same six to eight mappers that are receiving blocks?

Regards,
Greg
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

2018-04-22 Thread Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com 
I fully support the efforts of Nakaner. There are 6-8 users creating a mess in the Denver, Colorado area.See here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=5538075288#map=19/39.71967/-104.98736-Original Message->From: EthnicFood IsGreat >Sent: Apr 22, 2018 11:28 PM>To: talk...@openstreetmap.org>Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair>>> As a member of the US community, I'm in favor of reverting the bad >> edits, even if it removes some good contributions.>> Mark - Message: 1>> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 13:27:14 + (UTC)>> From: Mikel Maron >> To: Michael Reichert ,  Talk-us>> 	>> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair>> Message-ID: <232049907.3007698.1524317234...@mail.yahoo.com>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"   blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; } Nakaner>> This is an epic effort and appreciated.>> But there are two things that need to be cleared up.>>>   The choice was to either accept that OSM>> is overrun by a army of sockpuppets who ignore us at all or to make the>> time/money they invest into editing a waste of time/money by reverting their edits even if it removes good contributions. That's sad but what is the alternative? It's not a binary choice. The alternative is to establish good dialogue with the communities you are monitoring (the US on this case), and make sure there is awareness and buy in to your proposed action. I don't think that would be difficult or time consuming but does take consideration of other mappers in OSM who you don't regularly communicate with.>>>   There is no formal policy yet but that doesn't mean that they can do what they want to do. If it is against the interests of the community, it's against the existing unwritten rules.>> There is no such thing that gives anyone the right for large scale vigilante actions. There is enough justification to potentially take action (after discussion and with proper communication) -- sock puppets for one -- that you don't need to invoke organized editing.   If and when we do have a policy, we in the osmf will also need to develop clear guidance on how it is communicated and implemented. Mikel On Friday, April 20, 2018, 8:22 PM, Michael Reichert  wrote: Hi, Am 20.04.2018 um 17:13 schrieb Ian Dees:>>> I noticed that user Nakaner-repair just reverted 1000+ changesets>>> throughout the United States without any discussion in the local community.>>> Nakaner-repair points to a thread in the German forum [0] that seems to>>> indicate that they think these edits were made by paid mappers. Having not>>> heard from those suspected paid mappers, they went ahead and reverted>>> without discussion from the local community.>> TL;DR A group of mappers (presumeably from UTC+5) started adding>> highway=service and doing wrong quality assurance on roads in Europe and>> the U.S. in mid/end of March. British and later German mappers found>> these strange edits last week, some German searched for more accounts,>> SomeoneElse and myself wrote changeset comments and SomeoneElse (DWG)>> blocked many on them. Unfortunately, the 0-hour user blocks are not as useful as they are>> usually (and I expected them to be). They have been ignored and they>> continued editing or created sockpuppets. Longer blocks were ignored and>> they continued editing after the block. Changeset comments were not>> answered or the response did not answer the question. Since this week, they don't do any QA on roads any more and only add>> highway=service in the U.S. They create new accounts if their old>> accounts are blocked. This pattern now repeats day by day and the last>> resort was to revert their work because that causes financial damage (I>> hope they get paid). Please see some inline comments/responses on Ian's questions below. ->> The full story: On 2018-03-29 Will Phillips writes to the Talk-gb mailing list that he>> observed "a series of edits with users removing or changing access and>> oneway tags". He describes the quality of these edits as "very poor". At>> that time "none of them has yet responded to changeset comments".>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-March/021259.html SomeoneElse suggests him to write an email to d...@osmfoundation.org>> (the DWG).>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-March/021260.html I am not subscribed to Talk-gb and did not notice it at that time. On 2018-04-09 tux67 creates a new thread on the German forum because he>> found two users (sri_harsha and Premsakhare) editing roads globally>> without local knowledge. He asks other

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

2018-04-20 Thread Christoph Hormann 
On Friday 20 April 2018, Clifford Snow wrote:
> [...]
>
> Nakaner post a changeset comment which impart said:
>
> you seem to be part of a paid/organized/commercial editing activity.
> We have been telling your workmates for more than one week that you
> must add a note to your profile page at openstreetmap.org which
> states which company/organisation you belong to, who pays you for
> editing and which software, technology and rules you use to determine
> which roads you edit. You can edit the content of your user profile
> page via your user settings at openstreetmap.org.
>
>
> Please add that information and answer all questions before you
> upload any further edits to OpenStreetMap! Otherwise I will revert
> all your edits!

Yes, i saw that.  Note however none of this played a role in the 
discussion on the German forum.

IMO in cases where mappers do not react to attempts at communication at 
all this is a general problem not specific to organized/directed 
editing activities.

-- 
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

2018-04-20 Thread Clifford Snow 
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Christoph Hormann  wrote:

> On Friday 20 April 2018, Ian Dees wrote:
> >
> > I'd be interested in seeing all of these reverts reverted (at least
> > in the US) until discussion can take place.
>
> I don't know about these changes or the reverts of them in detail but on
> a general note here:  If mappers find edits they consider
> questionable - either factually or methodologically - and attempts to
> get in contact with the mapper making those edits fail it is commonly
> accepted practice that mappers can revert such changes.  This happens
> every day many times all over the world and is a good way to reduce the
> workload of the DWG by not getting them involved in all the small
> matters mappers can resolve between each other.
>

Nakaner post a changeset comment which impart said:

you seem to be part of a paid/organized/commercial editing activity. We
have been telling your workmates for more than one week that you must add a
note to your profile page at openstreetmap.org which states which
company/organisation you belong to, who pays you for editing and which
software, technology and rules you use to determine which roads you edit.
You can edit the content of your user profile page via your user settings
at openstreetmap.org.


Please add that information and answer all questions before you upload any
further edits to OpenStreetMap! Otherwise I will revert all your edits!

The user in question, a first time editor, added some service roads,
alleys, driveways and business service roads. They were all good. But my
concern is twofold. First the edits all look good. Yes they should have
added service= type, but that's not uncommon with a new mapper. There is no
good reason to revert. Second, as far as I know the Directed Edits Policy
has not been approved. Nakaner is attempting to enforce a policy before it
become a policy.


> If what the discussion on the German forum indicates is accurate, i.e.
> that there is a group of mappers performing organized edits which
> reject attempts to contact them and evade blocks established to ensure
> they do not continue without getting in contact with the community by
> creating sockpuppet accounts, i am pretty sure the local US community
> does not want this to continue in their domain and how to best
> accompish that would be a good subject of discussion.
>

None of us like users that don't respond to changeset comments, especially
when we know they are paid mappers. I mostly think of the SEO firms
dropping nodes with incomplete and often wrong information. Our efforts to
stop those have failed. The most infamous, what I called the "Updated" SEO,
uses a different user name with every edit. They may be doing this to avoid
disruption by users and especially DWG.   I think it is time for a new
approach.

Clifford
-- 
@osm_seattle
osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us
OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

2018-04-20 Thread Christoph Hormann 
On Friday 20 April 2018, Mikel Maron wrote:
>
> [...]Nakaner seems to be
> applying an organized editing policy here without grounds.

While you might think this is a good example for why such a policy is 
needed it seems to me that the motivation for both the user blocks by 
the DWG and the main argument that led to the conclusion in the German 
forum that the edits should be reverted was that the mappers in 
question did not react to attempts to contact them.

> While you are probably correct that the US community does not want
> this kind of behavior,, as far as I can tell no one was consulted
> outside of the German forum discussion, where the US community does
> not tend to hang out -- so I'm not sure you should just make this
> assumption. [...]

As said i don't want to assess Nakaners actions here.  If the edits in 
question have a clear focus on or are limited to the US is would 
probably have been a good idea to approach the US community about them.

But keep in mind that the thread in the German forum was started because 
a German speaking mapper came across questionable edits.  It is 
completely all right to start a discussion on the German forum on 
that - after all we do not even have a German language channel with 
global scope which might have been a better place for that.

-- 
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

2018-04-20 Thread Mikel Maron 
> If mappers find edits they consider questionable - either factually or 
>methodologically - and attempts to get in contact with the mapper making those 
>edits fail it is commonly accepted practice that mappers can revert such 
>changes
While that is somewhat correct (I question how common or accepted or in what 
cases a revert is called for, but anyway...), that's not what's happening as 
far as I understand. All edits are being reverted without evaluation of their 
individual merit. 
Nakaner seems to be applying an organized editing policy here without grounds. 
We do not have an official policy, nor do we have guidance on how this kind of 
situation would be managed.
I am not saying there is not an issue here with the edits by these mappers and 
this group. Just that this action by Nakaner does not look to be particularly 
well thought through.
>  i am pretty sure the local US community does not want this to continue in 
>their domain and how to best accomplish that would be a good subject of 
>discussion
While you are probably correct that the US community does not want this kind of 
behavior,, as far as I can tell no one was consulted outside of the German 
forum discussion, where the US community does not tend to hang out -- so I'm 
not sure you should just make this assumption. How best to accomplish this 
would actually be a good subject of discussion, but _before_ a mass action such 
as the one Nakaner has deputized himself to do.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron 

On Friday, April 20, 2018, 12:30:02 PM EDT, Christoph Hormann 
 wrote:  
 
 On Friday 20 April 2018, Ian Dees wrote:
>
> I'd be interested in seeing all of these reverts reverted (at least
> in the US) until discussion can take place.

I don't know about these changes or the reverts of them in detail but on 
a general note here:  If mappers find edits they consider 
questionable - either factually or methodologically - and attempts to 
get in contact with the mapper making those edits fail it is commonly 
accepted practice that mappers can revert such changes.  This happens 
every day many times all over the world and is a good way to reduce the 
workload of the DWG by not getting them involved in all the small 
matters mappers can resolve between each other.

OTOH reverting an edit, even if that edit itself is a revert, without 
trying to discuss it with the mapper making it, is generally not 
considered to be acceptable.

I don't want to assess Nakaner's edits with that but your call for a 
blanket revert of them without a previous discussion giving him the 
chance to explain his intentions with those edits and their merit would 
not be in line with established practice in OSM.

If what the discussion on the German forum indicates is accurate, i.e. 
that there is a group of mappers performing organized edits which 
reject attempts to contact them and evade blocks established to ensure 
they do not continue without getting in contact with the community by 
creating sockpuppet accounts, i am pretty sure the local US community 
does not want this to continue in their domain and how to best 
accompish that would be a good subject of discussion.

-- 
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
  ___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair

2018-04-20 Thread Christoph Hormann 
On Friday 20 April 2018, Ian Dees wrote:
>
> I'd be interested in seeing all of these reverts reverted (at least
> in the US) until discussion can take place.

I don't know about these changes or the reverts of them in detail but on 
a general note here:  If mappers find edits they consider 
questionable - either factually or methodologically - and attempts to 
get in contact with the mapper making those edits fail it is commonly 
accepted practice that mappers can revert such changes.  This happens 
every day many times all over the world and is a good way to reduce the 
workload of the DWG by not getting them involved in all the small 
matters mappers can resolve between each other.

OTOH reverting an edit, even if that edit itself is a revert, without 
trying to discuss it with the mapper making it, is generally not 
considered to be acceptable.

I don't want to assess Nakaner's edits with that but your call for a 
blanket revert of them without a previous discussion giving him the 
chance to explain his intentions with those edits and their merit would 
not be in line with established practice in OSM.

If what the discussion on the German forum indicates is accurate, i.e. 
that there is a group of mappers performing organized edits which 
reject attempts to contact them and evade blocks established to ensure 
they do not continue without getting in contact with the community by 
creating sockpuppet accounts, i am pretty sure the local US community 
does not want this to continue in their domain and how to best 
accompish that would be a good subject of discussion.

-- 
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk