sending again 

sent from a phone

> On 19. Dec 2018, at 09:33, Ervin Malicdem <schad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> But still, the issue remains that when the community does not care about 
> these violations, then we are prone to such instance over and over.


I wholeheartedly agree, people traditionally had not to fear anything for 
ignoring the license requirements and the way attribution should be given 
according to the legal FAQ (at least this is the impression I got in 11 years 
of OSM, please correct me if I’m wrong).

I just took another look whether facebook had fixed their maps in the meantime 
and noticed there is not only no attribution at all on the mobile map (on a fb 
page), there is also a link below the map called “get directions” which leads 
to google maps, while clicking the map picture itself opens Apple Maps (on an 
iPhone).

Similarly the default Mapbox mobile style (mb gl js) pretends to have to “hide” 
OpenStreetMap behind an “i” button on small screens, but they have found 
sufficient space to keep the mapbox logo visible all the time.

Apple Maps have removed the legal link in the left corner and show no 
attribution at all on the map, after clicking the “i” there is attribution to 
tomtom and the weather channel at the bottom of a settings page, but still no 
mention of OSM:


Is there someone at the OSMF looking into these cases? At least the major 
global players should be asked to attribute like we require.

Cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to