Re: [OSM-talk] New wave of Pokémon Go mappers – check the parks

2018-04-25 Thread Dave F 

FYI
way[recreation_ground];

uses recreation_ground as the key, not the value. So 
leisure=recreation_ground etc won't be returned


DaveF.

On 25/04/2018 07:45, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:


25. Apr 2018 06:17 by roland.olbri...@gmx.de 
:


Thus, I suggest the query


here is overpass link with it: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yee 
(navigate to your area, click "run" and wait)



At least in my region detecting parks and recreation ground with 
untagged name state (without name and without noname) is useful to 
detect mistagged areas http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yeg



[timeout:120]
[bbox:{{bbox}}];
(
way[leisure=park][!name][noname!=yes];
rel[leisure=park][!name][noname!=yes];
way[recreation_ground][!name][noname!=yes];
rel[recreation_ground][!name][noname!=yes];
);
out geom meta;



___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] New wave of Pokémon Go mappers – check the parks

2018-04-25 Thread Dennis Raylin Chen 
Maybe using Mapbox tools OSMCha is more convenience. The have a option for
filtering new mapper adding park or another Pokeomon Go related features

Here is a example link:
https://osmcha.mapbox.com/?filters=%7B%22geometry%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%7B%22coordinates%22%3A%5B%5B%5B118.28966552120511%2C26.16600169629723%5D%2C%5B117.7060787938446%2C21.795131301801092%5D%2C%5B113.27081966593113%2C17.954247234327823%5D%2C%5B118.4063828666724%2C17.954247234327823%5D%2C%5B123.07507668553251%2C21.03452323422715%5D%2C%5B124.70911952213464%2C25.219417628166156%5D%2C%5B121.67446853987684%2C27.829878013154413%5D%2C%5B118.28966552120511%2C26.16600169629723%5D%5D%5D%2C%22type%22%3A%22Polygon%22%7D%2C%22value%22%3A%7B%22coordinates%22%3A%5B%5B%5B118.28966552120511%2C26.16600169629723%5D%2C%5B117.7060787938446%2C21.795131301801092%5D%2C%5B113.27081966593113%2C17.954247234327823%5D%2C%5B118.4063828666724%2C17.954247234327823%5D%2C%5B123.07507668553251%2C21.03452323422715%5D%2C%5B124.70911952213464%2C25.219417628166156%5D%2C%5B121.67446853987684%2C27.829878013154413%5D%2C%5B118.28966552120511%2C26.16600169629723%5D%5D%5D%2C%22type%22%3A%22Polygon%22%7D%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%222017-05-28%22%2C%22value%22%3A%222017-05-28%22%7D%5D%2C%22reasons%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Pokemon%20nest%20feature%20added%20by%20new%20user%22%2C%22value%22%3A50%7D%2C%7B%22label%22%3A%22Park%20added%20by%20new%20user%22%2C%22value%22%3A44%7D%5D%7D

just adjust the area to the area you are interested

Dennis

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Mateusz Konieczny 
wrote:

>
> 25. Apr 2018 06:17 by roland.olbri...@gmx.de:
>
> Thus, I suggest the query
>
>
> here is overpass link with it: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yee (navigate
> to your area, click "run" and wait)
>
>
> At least in my region detecting parks and recreation ground with untagged
> name state (without name and without noname) is useful to detect mistagged
> areas http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yeg
>
>
> [timeout:120]
> [bbox:{{bbox}}];
> (
> way[leisure=park][!name][noname!=yes];
> rel[leisure=park][!name][noname!=yes];
> way[recreation_ground][!name][noname!=yes];
> rel[recreation_ground][!name][noname!=yes];
> );
> out geom meta;
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] New wave of Pokémon Go mappers – check the parks

2018-04-25 Thread Mateusz Konieczny 

25. Apr 2018 06:17 by roland.olbri...@gmx.de :


> Thus, I suggest the query
>




here is overpass link with it: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yee 
 (navigate to your area, click "run" and wait)




At least in my region detecting parks and recreation ground with untagged name 
state (without name and without noname) is useful to detect mistagged areas 
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yeg 





[timeout:120]
[bbox:{{bbox}}];
(
way[leisure=park][!name][noname!=yes];
rel[leisure=park][!name][noname!=yes];
way[recreation_ground][!name][noname!=yes];
rel[recreation_ground][!name][noname!=yes];
);
out geom meta;

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] New wave of Pokémon Go mappers – check the parks

2018-04-24 Thread Roland Olbricht 

Hi,

Michael, thank you for pointing to the problem. The query finds parks 
that existed already on April 23rd midnight. I think the relevant parks 
are rather those parks that have changed since that date. Thus, I 
suggest the query


[timeout:120]
[bbox:{{bbox}}];
(
 way[leisure=park];
 rel[leisure=park];
 way[leisure=garden];
 rel[leisure=garden];
 way[recreation_ground];
 rel[recreation_ground];
 way[leisure=playground];
 rel[leisure=playground];
 way[leisure=pitch];
 rel[leisure=pitch];
 way[landuse=grass];
 rel[landuse=grass];
);
(way._(newer:"2018-04-23T00:00:00Z")->.w;rel._(newer:"2018-04-23T00:00:00Z"););
out geom meta;

Best regards,
Roland

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] New wave of Pokémon Go mappers – check the parks

2018-04-24 Thread Michael Reichert 
Hi,

Pokémon Go seems to have updated its OpenStreetMap data [1] leading to
an higher than usual number of new mapppers adding parks – some or many
of them are fictional. It is a good idea to check
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/newestosm for your country (click on the
flags to show only edits from your country) and use Overpass API queries
looking for ways tagged with like leisure=park, natural=grassland or
landuse=grass which have been modified recently.


This might be a suitable Overpass query.

[date:"2018-04-23T00:00:00Z"]
[timeout:120]
[bbox:{{bbox}}];
(
 way[leisure=park];
 rel[leisure=park];
 way[leisure=garden];
 rel[leisure=garden];
 way[recreation_ground];
 rel[recreation_ground];
 way[leisure=playground];
 rel[leisure=playground];
 way[leisure=pitch];
 rel[leisure=pitch];
 way[landuse=grass];
 rel[landuse=grass];
);
out geom meta;

Please be friendly even if all edits of a user are junk. Add a changeset
comment to all reverted changeset to inform other mappers that they can
continue reviewing other changesets and comment one of the changesets of
the newbie telling him that edits have to match the reality on the
ground. You might include a link to
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/04/01/tips-pokemon-go-2/#

Best regards

Michael


[1]
https://www.reddit.com/r/TheSilphRoad/comments/8ehf8u/new_nests_osm_data_has_officially_changed_nests/


-- 
Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten
ausgenommen)
I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk