Re: [OSM-talk] [proposal] Default values in a relation definition

2010-05-28 Thread Vincent Pottier 
Le 28/05/2010 16:00, Vincent Pottier wrote :
 ...

I beg your pardon.
The link : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Definition
--
FrViPofm

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [proposal] Default values in a relation definition

2010-05-28 Thread Pieren 
I think you should rename your proposal as 'defaults' instead of
'definition' (type=defaults). And the prefix def: is not really necessary
in your def:key=value tags.

Pieren
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [proposal] Default values in a relation definition

2010-05-28 Thread John Smith 
I wouldn't use the '' symbol as it might be a value, not sure what to
use instead.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [proposal] Default values in a relation definition

2010-05-28 Thread Roy Wallace 
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
 I think you should rename your proposal as 'defaults' instead of
 'definition' (type=defaults).

Agreed.

 And the prefix def: is not really necessary
 in your def:key=value tags.

Perhaps not, but it does help to make it clear that these are unusual
tags with an unusual purpose.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk