Re: [OSM-talk] Multipolygon tags removed
2010/1/1 Katie Filbert filbe...@gmail.com: I recently added some buildings to OSM that have courtyards, thus added a multipolygon relation to them. I notice now that some of these buildings are not rendering on OSM. Looking at the history, Ropino removed the multipolygon tag from the relation on December 8. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/338011/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/357268/history Did I do something wrong with tagging buildings how I did? I think I tagged them correctly and undid these two. I want to understand what (and why) Ropino is doing? Are these mistakes on his/her end, in deleting the tags, and if so, do we have the ability to revert the changeset? This is likely because the members of these two multipolygons didn't have roles assigned in the relation and instead had tags role=inner and role=outer -- may that be the editor's fault? That said I believe Ropino's removal of the tag is vandalism either way. Cheers ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Multipolygon tags removed
Hi, Katie Filbert wrote: Did I do something wrong with tagging buildings how I did? I think I tagged them correctly and undid these two. Your version was ok. (The role is optional and meant to make things easier for human editors.) Ropino has made a mistake. His changeset comment translates to *added* multipolygon but in fact he removed the type=multipolygon tag, so I assume that he intended no harm but somehow the script he was using has malfunctioned. (If he was using a script - the last time people complained to him about bot edits it turned out that he did these manually.) I'll write to him and inquire, and help him fix the problem if he needs help. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Multipolygon tags removed
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Andrzej Zaborowski andrew.zaborow...@intel.com wrote This is likely because the members of these two multipolygons didn't have roles assigned in the relation and instead had tags role=inner and role=outer -- may that be the editor's fault? That said I believe Ropino's removal of the tag is vandalism either way. Having role=inner as the tag seemed to work, though I see that what I did was not really correct. I see how it's been changed to put this on the relation itself. (assume you or someone changed it - thanks!) To help people understand how to do this with Potlatch, I posted an example on the wiki. (please improve or correct if I said anything wrong there) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Potlatch_example Regards, -Katie ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Multipolygon tags removed
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Your version was ok. (The role is optional and meant to make things easier for human editors.) I think it might have been okay, but I didn't tag it in the best way. Ropino has made a mistake. His changeset comment translates to *added* multipolygon but in fact he removed the type=multipolygon tag, so I assume that he intended no harm but somehow the script he was using has malfunctioned. (If he was using a script - the last time people complained to him about bot edits it turned out that he did these manually.) I'll write to him and inquire, and help him fix the problem if he needs help. Thanks. I assumed it was a script and there is some bug that caused these edits. Regards, Katie Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
