Re: [OSM-talk] Request for comments: Playground Equipment Proposal

[Liz]

On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, colliar wrote:
 Am 01.06.2010 16:01, schrieb lulu-...@gmx.de:
  Hi there,
  
  this is not my proposal, but as RfC was forgotten I ask for your comments
  now.
  
  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Playground_Equipment
It has been well discussed on mailing list, tagging, where info on tagging now 
goes
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2010-March/001644.html
Just because it doesn't have RFC in the title doesn't mean it wasn't done

 
 I think it is not bad,
thanks for your opinion

 but anyway as voting just finished and it was not
 anounced on the list and the tag is not wide used, I would say we should
 set it back to proposed and wait for some response.
 
What reason other your personal ignorance do you have for restarting a process 
which has been fully completed?

 I do not get why it is too hard to send two emails to some mailing-lists.
The emails were sent.
you might check the wiki, and find that recently someone, not me, changed the 
list for notification to tagging from talk, now that tagging is nearly one 
year old.
You can join here
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

 
 colliar

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Request for comments: Playground Equipment Proposal

[David Murn]

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 07:06 +1000, Liz wrote:
  but anyway as voting just finished and it was not
  anounced on the list and the tag is not wide used, I would say we should
  set it back to proposed and wait for some response.
  
 What reason other your personal ignorance do you have for restarting a 
 process 
 which has been fully completed?

The committee of the Wildlife Foundation would be impressed.

David


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk