Re: [OSM-talk] copying numbering (ref)
On 14/02/2020 16:25, stevea wrote: Or, using unsigned_ref=* is an option. SteveA I like this one, thank you. I just suggested the practice to the people reading the OSM Panama Telegram group. MF ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] copying numbering (ref)
Or, using unsigned_ref=* is an option. SteveA > On Feb 14, 2020, at 1:08 PM, Joseph Eisenberg > wrote: > > > “ they don't really use numbers for roads except internally” > > If they do not post signs, and locals do not usually know the numbers, then > there should not be a ref for those provincial roads in Openstreetmap. > > -Joseph Eisenberg > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] copying numbering (ref)
> “ they don't really use numbers for roads except internally” If they do not post signs, and locals do not usually know the numbers, then there should not be a ref for those provincial roads in Openstreetmap. -Joseph Eisenberg ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] copying numbering (ref)
sent from a phone > Il giorno 14 feb 2020, alle ore 16:40, Mario Frasca ha > scritto: > > what would you do? what’s posted on the ground? Cheers Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
