Re: [Talk-cat] Importació centres docents a Catalunya

[Ismael Luceno]

On 22/Sep/2019 14:00, Lanxana . wrote:
> Com a guia m'he estat mirant la importació de les oficines de correus
> de Madrid [3]. Fan servir dos scripts (tots dos estan a github): un
> per convertir l'etiquetat i l'altre per generar les tasques per al
> gestor.

Seria interessant unir les dues parts i automatitzar la tasca; podem
generar un fitxer XML amb el resultat llest per importar, així es pot
simplement revisar i importar.

Per fer les unions amb nodes existents, quan no hi ha referència més
fiable, simplement es pot usar la posició amb algun marge d'error i
qualesvol altra etiqueta disponible.

> Crec que podríem aprofitar el segon, però caldria adaptar o programar
> un que faci el mateix que el primer però amb la estructura del xml de
> la Generalitat (m'ha semblat que és diferent) i amb les nostres
> etiquetes.
<...> 

Jo diria que es important tenir un script genèric, capaç d'importar des
de qualsevol font, i així concentrar esforços, perquè molt del que
necessiten fer segurament és comú.

No sembla una tasca difícil; ia més madridxml2osm no és fàcil d'adaptar,
tot està codificat en el codi font, quan hauria de ser una transformació
guiada pel contingut.

___
Talk-cat mailing list
Talk-cat@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cat

[OSM-talk-fr] Coursier à vélo

[Cédric Frayssinet]

Bonjour à tous,

Je m'en remets à votre expertise. Comment tague-t-on les coursiers à
vélo qui ont pignon ( :) ) sur rue ?

Merci d'avance,

Cédric


___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

[OSM-talk] OSM Consultant Needed

[Joe Savage]

Hi,

I am currently looking for an OSM Data Consultant to provide some
assistance for us to move to ultising OSM data in a number of key use
cases. A rough outline can be viewed at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RtWl5bP-77j2cblp91lkC5YqfwnRV61jYtIJip2FyWo/edit?usp=sharing.
We see the value in OSM data going forward and we are happy to do some
accreditation as part of this of course. If anybody can help us in utiising
OSM as we want to please get in touch!

Many thanks,

-- 
Joe Savage
CTO
[image: Commercial People]
 +44 (0) 20 8594 8220 <02085948220>
 j.sav...@commercialpeople.com
 www.commercialpeople.com | www.residentialpeople.com
Angel House, 1st Floor, 225 Marsh Wall, London, E14 9FW
 

Commercial People Ltd accepts no liability for the content of this email,
or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the
information provided unless that information is subsequently confirmed in
writing. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that
disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ZIP codes from OSM in non-compatible licensed dataset

[Kathleen Lu via legal-talk]

Cost is a relevant factor in database protection law, which is one of the
>> rights covered by the licence. First, a database is not protected unless
>> there has been "substantial investment" in its making.
>>
>
>
>
> "substantial investment" is not the same as monetary cost. The human time
> that is needed to collect and arrange the data is also an investment.
>
> Of course they are not equivalent, and human time is another type of
investment. However, cost still remains a relevant factor of consideration.


>
>>
>> All that said, I am still of the opinion that it is not necessary to find
>> the exact line here, because the original use Lars-Daniel proposed was one
>> of a collective database so long as the two sets of ZIP properties were
>> kept in separate columns, which he appeared quite comfortable with.
>>
>
>
>
> are kept in separate columns and are not used in combination/both to
> create a produced work?
>
> Lars-Daniel already said that they are kept in separate columns and not
de-duplicated. There is no requirement that, in order to function as a
Collective Database, data types may not be used together to create a
Produced Work. To the contrary, the guidance is that the most axiomatic
Produced Work, a global map, may be created from multiple Collective
Databases consisting of different data types and/or different countries.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [talk-cz] Avízo: mikromapathonek na SPŠ Stavební

[Jan Macura]

Akce proběhla. Podle mě bez problémů i bez excesů v mapě. Seznam nově
registrovaných účtů zde:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:YjM/GIS_Day_2019

H.

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 23:16, Jan Macura  wrote:

> Ahoj,
>
> tak trochu podle
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Z%C3%A1sady_pro_organizovan%C3%A9_editace
> , ale zdaleka ne tak podrobně bych chtěl informovat komunitu, že zítra mezi
> 12. a 13. hodinou plánuji ukázat studentům Střední průmyslové školy
> stavební v Plzni, jak editovat OSM a vyzkoušet si s nimi editaci na jednom
> tasku z HOT Tasking Manageru.
>
> Nezakládám novou stránku na wiki, ani neoznamuji 14 dní předem, protože je
> to opravdu akce minimálního rozsahu. Očekávám cca 20 nových účtů, od
> každého pár editací. Ani není jisté, jestli se k editaci samotné nakonec
> dostaneme... Všechny editace by se měly omezit na daný task z projektu
> MissingMaps a sady změn budou samozřejmě označeny příslušnými hashtagy, ale
> nemohu vyloučit, že se objeví i nějaká editace vandalská, např. okolo
> školy  (protože známe
> Prušánky). Každopádně budu evidovat nově založené účty a bude tak existovat
> možnost zpětné kontroly.
>
> Není to úplně podle *Zásad*, ale myslím, že takovéto oznámení odpovídá
> rozsahu (jednorázové) akce.
>
> Zdraví
>  Honza Mac.
>
>
>
___
talk-cz mailing list
talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

Re: [talk-ph] [Tabang-AI] Siquijor road mapping project

[maning sambale]

TabangAI Siquijor road mapping is 93% mapped, 69% validated.
Please grab a few tasks to take this to the finish line!
https://tasks-assisted.hotosm.org/project/16/
Daghang salamat!

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:13 AM maning sambale
 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> TabangAI Siquijor Mapping is complete, we need help validating:
> https://tasks-assisted.hotosm.org/project/16
> If you have project specific notes to share, please post here:
> https://github.com/OSMPH/Tabang-AI/issues/10
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 9:58 PM maning sambale
>  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In collaboration with our local contacts in Lazi, Siquijor, we have
> > just launched our very fist AI-assisted road mapping project for the
> > province of Siquijor [0]!
> > Please help improve/complete the roads in Siquijor in the tasking
> > manager linked in the ticket.
> >
> > Beyond mapping we would love to hear feedback on workflow and how we
> > can do it better.
> >
> > Happy mapping!
> >
> > [0] https://github.com/OSMPH/Tabang-AI/issues/10
> > --
> > cheers,
> > maning
> > --
> > "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> > https://github.com/maning
> > http://twitter.com/maningsambale
> > --
>
>
>
> --
> cheers,
> maning
> --
> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
> https://github.com/maning
> http://twitter.com/maningsambale
> --



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://github.com/maning
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[Talk-at] Mapathon kommenden Montag im TÜWI

[Andreas]

Hallo,

kommenden Montag veranstaltet die BOKU mit Unterstützung von Ärzte ohne
Grenzen einen Mapathon im TÜWI an der Boku.

Für weitere Infos siehe
https://www.openstreetmap.at/2019/10/mapathon-im-tuewi-an-der-boku/

lg
Andreas
(geologist)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Osmose:Intégration, peut-on tous les faire ?

[marc marc]

Bonjour,

je ne comprend pas le sens de ta question.

les suggestions d'osmose sont là parce qu'il a été estimés qu'elles 
portent sur des situations utiles à améliorer même si osmose n'a pas 
toujours raison.
as-tu un exemple d'un objet oü la suggestio te semble sans intérêt ?

le mieux, niveau intérêt, c'est de commander par sélectionner
ceux de gravité haute (menu en haut à gauche)

Cordialement,
Marc

Le 11.10.19 à 15:16, Geocaching LoneWolfy a écrit :
> Bonjour.
> 
> Au niveau d'Osmose, peut-on corriger la catégorie Osmose:Intégration ?
> Est-ce qu'il y a généralement un intérêt de faire les catégories:
> - Missing tags
> - Bad tags
> - Tags to remove
> - Tags name
> 
> Merci
> 
> ___
> Talk-fr mailing list
> Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
> 

___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Mappa Mercia October mapping

[Brian Prangle]

Hi Gareth

My only two free dates are 19 and 26 October. Of the two I'd prefer 26
October. So I propose 26 October unless it's inconvenient for anyone else

Regards

Brian

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 9:51 AM Gareth L  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Has a Saturday to visit Houlton, this October, been decided upon?
>
> The link road (from Clifton-upon-dunsmore/butlers leap) wass due to be
> opened imminently, although it was scheduled “late september/early october”
> and now it sounds like December.
>
>
>
> A lot more construction work is underway, to the west of the visitors
> centre - closer to hillmorton - although my brief passing through the other
> night made it look mostly like groundwork and foundations, with a portion
> of the crick road having a lane closure and a trench dug along it.
>
>
>
> Gareth
> ___
> Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
> Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
>
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands

[OSM-talk-fr] Osmose:Intégration, peut-on tous les faire ?

[Geocaching LoneWolfy]

Bonjour.

Au niveau d'Osmose, peut-on corriger la catégorie Osmose:Intégration ?
Est-ce qu'il y a généralement un intérêt de faire les catégories:
- Missing tags
- Bad tags
- Tags to remove
- Tags name

Merci
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Projet OpenMaps

[Julien djakk]

Je te propose : PCM, Pretty Cool Maps :)


Julien “djakk”

Le jeu. 10 oct. 2019 à 18:10, Cédric Frayssinet  a
écrit :

>
>
> Bonjour à tous,
>
> L'application est dorénavant disponible sur le store F-Droid :
> https://f-droid.org/packages/app.fedilab.openmaps/
>
> Elle est déjà traduite en 5 langues, dont le français.
>
> N'hésitez pas à proposer des améliorations sur le dépôt :
> https://framagit.org/tom79/openmaps/issues . J'essaierai de qualifier les
> demandes sachant que Thomas n'est pas du tout expert OSM, il se contente de
> coder et il le fait plutôt bien et vite :)
>
> A noter que le nom risque de changer car OpenMaps est visiblement plutôt
> beaucoup pris sur internet... Faudrait pas avoir un procès pour une
> histoire de nom :)
>
>
> Cédric
>
> Le 06/10/2019 à 15:27, Cédric Frayssinet a écrit :
>
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Et merci pour vos retours. Je n'ai pas forcément pensé immédiatement
> l'application comme outils de contributions mais plutôt un outil à avoir
> sur soi pour switcher facilement entre les services éparpillés sur le web.
>
> On peut imaginer le scénario suivant (purement fictif, hein ^^) : Je veux
> aller manger dans un restau végétarien au centre d'une petite ville de
> province.
>
> - je lance l'application et OpenRouteService pour trouver le trajet
> adapté,
> - je switche sur OpenfuelMap pour faire le plein moins cher,
> - je switche sur FreeParking pour trouver un parking gratuit,
> - je switche sur OpenVegeMap et avant, je peux avoir basculé sur
> OpenBeerMap pour trouver le bar avec ma bière préféré :)
>
> Bref, l'idée est une application simple et je trouve que l'application s'y
> prête mieux qu'un navigateur sur mobile.
> De plus, je suis de plus en plus surpris par l'usage des smartphones des
> gens 'normaux'. La plupart se contente de recherches dans le champ Google
> pour afficher le navigateur, ils n'ont pas l'usage des marque-pages,
> historique ou raccourcis sur le bureau du smartphone.
>
> Concernant la contribution, je l'ai rajouté après car il m'arrive souvent
> de lancer la navigateur pour avoir le rendu osm.org afin de savoir si
> certains POI que je croise sont déjà dans la base. C'est la contribution
> avec OsmAnd qui me rend méfiant. En ajoutant, OpenAdvert ou MapContrib,
> cela pourrait être pratique de tout avoir sous la main.
>
> Cédric
>
> Le 06/10/2019 à 14:46, Stéphane Péneau a écrit :
>
> Question peut-être idiote :
> Pourquoi une appli et pas un site web ?
>
> Stf
>
> Le 06/10/2019 à 14:03, PanierAvide a écrit :
>
> Bonjour Cédric,
>
> Content de découvrir cette application, ça me semble très prometteur pour
> faire la promotion de la diversité des données d'OSM. Avec quelques
> fonctionnalités en plus (liens vers les applis mobiles, ajout de notes ?)
> ça pourrait même devenir un bon couteau suisse de contribution ;-)
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Adrien P.
>
> Le 06/10/2019 à 10:43, Cédric Frayssinet a écrit :
>
> Bonjour à tous,
>
> Quand je suis en formation SNT, pour présenter OpenStreetMap, j'ai
> tendance à afficher quelques cartes thématiques pour montrer la richesse
> de l'éco-système OpenStreetMap. Et puis, jeudi, lors d'une formation, je
> me suis dit que ce serait pas mal d'avoir une appli qui me recense ces
> cartes.
>
> J'en ai parlé à Tom79, le talentueux développeur de Fedilab (application
> pour Mastodon, PeerTube, Pleroma, PixelFed...) qui m'a codé cela hier.
>
> L'application OpenMaps est donc née et elle propose un unique bouton
> menu qui permet de switcher très rapidement sur les différentes cartes
> basées sur OSM, classées par catégories.
>
> J'ai donc la toute première version à vous soumettre, l'apk est sur la
> page du projet ici : https://framagit.org/tom79/openmaps
>
> Dites-moi ce que vous en pensez :)
>
> Bon dimanche !
>
> Cédric
>
> PS : il y a un bug sur MapContrib, je ne sais pas bien pourquoi...
>
>
> ___
> Talk-fr mailing list
> Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
>
>
> ___
> Talk-fr mailing list
> Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-fr mailing list
> Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
>
>
> --
> Dégooglisé !  - Sociétaire Enercoop
> , l'énergie
> militante
>
> Sur Mastodon : @bristow...@framapiaf.org
> 
>
> [image: Promouvoir et soutenir le logiciel libre] 
>
> ___
> Talk-fr mailing 
> listTalk-fr@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
>
>
> --
> Dégooglisé !  - Sociétaire Enercoop
> , l'énergie
> militante
>
> Sur Mastodon : @bristow...@framapiaf.org

[OSM-talk] 'Ultimate gift to future generations': plan to laser map all land on Earth | The Guardian

[Andy Mabbett]

No doubt of interest:

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/oct/11/ultimate-gift-to-future-generations-plan-to-laser-map-all-land-on-earth

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-de] Kreuz Werl - seltsame Spurnutzung

[chris66]

Am 11.10.2019 um 13:19 schrieb Florian Lohoff:


Dabei ist mir der hier aufgefallen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car=51.5349%2C7.9014%3B51.5332%2C7.8828#map=17/51.53369/7.89198=N

Wenn man von ost nach west auf der A44 durch das Kreuz Werl routet
wird die Nebenfahrbahn präferiert - In Gegenrichtung ist das nicht so.

Grundsätzlich scheint die zu gehen - nur eben schlechter bewertet.

Hab ich so spontan nicht verstanden.


Hi,
die Hauptfahrbahn hat maxspeed=signals, die Parallelspur
maxspeed=none.

Und der Router meint wohl, dass man bei maxspeed=none schneller
voran kommt, was ja durchaus sein kann.

Christian



___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

[Talk-de] Kreuz Werl - seltsame Spurnutzung

[Florian Lohoff]

Hi,
ich habe eben meine Routenüberwachung ein wenig ausgedehnt auf teile
der A44 und A1 

Dabei ist mir der hier aufgefallen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car=51.5349%2C7.9014%3B51.5332%2C7.8828#map=17/51.53369/7.89198=N

Wenn man von ost nach west auf der A44 durch das Kreuz Werl routet
wird die Nebenfahrbahn präferiert - In Gegenrichtung ist das nicht so.

Grundsätzlich scheint die zu gehen - nur eben schlechter bewertet.

Hab ich so spontan nicht verstanden.

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
UTF-8 Test: The  ran after a , but the  ran away


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [OSM-talk] Should a deleted user's chainset list be removed?

[Andy Townsend]

On 11/10/2019 10:44, Dave F via talk wrote:

Hi

I was in a conversation with a user who's account has since been 
deleted. ... When they were, I noticed a few dubious edits that I was 
planning to double check in case they required reverting/amending. Is 
there a way to see them?


Via the website at OpenStreetMap.org, not easily.

The "history" list will show them, but you may have to scroll back a 
long way.  I wouldn't expect that to be practical.




As it stands it means those intent on vandalism could create an 
account, deliberately add erroneous data, then delete leaving no 
traceable record of their edits.


No, as previously mentioned there _is_ a trace of the edits, just not a 
nice button that you can click to get them on osm.org.


A place to start might be things last modified by them, so try 
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/N21 which will fetch items in an area last 
modified by that user.  If you want to search at a previous point in 
time you may be able to combine that with a date search (see the 
overpass pages in the OSM wiki for info).





Is this related to GDPR?


Not as far as I'm aware - this functionality predates GDPR.

Best Regards,

Andy



___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Should a deleted user's chainset list be removed?

[Pavlo Dudka]

Hi, you can see his changes here
https://osmcha.mapbox.com/?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Stonemill2%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22Stonemill2%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%7D


Pavlo

пт, 11 жовт. 2019 о 12:46 Dave F via talk  пише:

> Hi
>
> I was in a conversation with a user who's account has since been
> deleted. Unsure if it was by admin or self removed.
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/user_7411226 (When he was editing his
> username was 'Stonemill2')
>
> As you can see his previous chainsets are now unviewable. When they
> were, I noticed a few dubious edits that I was planning to double check
> in case they required reverting/amending. Is there a way to see them?
>
> As it stands it means those intent on vandalism could create an account,
> deliberately add erroneous data, then delete leaving no traceable record
> of their edits.
>
> Is this related to GDPR?
>
> DaveF.
>
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Should a deleted user's chainset list be removed?

[Dave F via talk]

Thanks for the replies, but before we delve headlong into detailed 
database manipulation could it be established why they're not listed on 
the website & if possible, get them displayed.


DaveF

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Should a deleted user's chainset list be removed?

[Michael Reichert]

Hi,


Am 11. Oktober 2019 11:52:17 MESZ schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer 
:
> When you know the userid you can grep their changes from a history
> file
> (e.g. with osmium tool and the opl format).
> Provided you don't have a history file around, it is a serious effort
> though, due to the file size...

Changeset IDs can be retrieved from the changeset dump (an XML file, very slow 
to parse).

If the activities of the user were limited to a specific region, you can 
download an extract of the full history planet dump with all user data from 
https://osm-internal.download.geofabrik.de/ The full history planet dump 
extracts are updated weekly.

Best regards

Michael

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Should a deleted user's chainset list be removed?

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

When you know the userid you can grep their changes from a history file
(e.g. with osmium tool and the opl format).
Provided you don't have a history file around, it is a serious effort
though, due to the file size...

Cheers,
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] Should a deleted user's chainset list be removed?

[Dave F via talk]

Hi

I was in a conversation with a user who's account has since been 
deleted. Unsure if it was by admin or self removed.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/user_7411226 (When he was editing his 
username was 'Stonemill2')


As you can see his previous chainsets are now unviewable. When they 
were, I noticed a few dubious edits that I was planning to double check 
in case they required reverting/amending. Is there a way to see them?


As it stands it means those intent on vandalism could create an account, 
deliberately add erroneous data, then delete leaving no traceable record 
of their edits.


Is this related to GDPR?

DaveF.



___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[Talk-hr] OSM meetup 2019-10-16

[hbogner]

https://osm-hr.org/2019/10/11/osm-meetup-2019-10-16/

U srijedu 16.10.2019. u 18:00, Geodetski fakultet, Kačićeva 26.

Nalazimo se u predavaoni 117 Geodetskog fakulteta(bit će označen put do 
prostorije), gdje će se raspraviti najbolji načini popravka stanja u 
Zagrebu, biciklistička infrastruktura, OSM u nastavi, te još neke druge 
novosti.


Kasnije nastavljamo druženje u nekom od okolnih ugostiteljskih objekata 
uz pivo,vino,čaj, kavu ili napitak po želji.



___
Talk-hr mailing list
Talk-hr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hr

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ZIP codes from OSM in non-compatible licensed dataset

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

Am Do., 10. Okt. 2019 um 23:25 Uhr schrieb Kathleen Lu via legal-talk <
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org>:

> Cost is a relevant factor in database protection law, which is one of the
> rights covered by the licence. First, a database is not protected unless
> there has been "substantial investment" in its making.
>



"substantial investment" is not the same as monetary cost. The human time
that is needed to collect and arrange the data is also an investment.


>
> All that said, I am still of the opinion that it is not necessary to find
> the exact line here, because the original use Lars-Daniel proposed was one
> of a collective database so long as the two sets of ZIP properties were
> kept in separate columns, which he appeared quite comfortable with.
>



are kept in separate columns and are not used in combination/both to create
a produced work?

Cheers
Martin
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

[talk-ph] Revisiting road classifications

[Jherome Miguel]

With the Department of Public Works and Highways introducing route numbers
and reworking the road classifications since 2014, it seems the road
classifications also need to be revamped.

The 2014 DPWH classifications are:

*Expressway
*National road
** National primary road (1-2 digit routes)
** National secondary road (3-digit routes)
** National tertiary road
*Provincial road
*City/municipal road
*Barangay road

while the older classifications are:

*Expressway
*National roads
**North-South Backbone
**East-West Laterals
**Other Roads of Strategic Importance
*Provincial roads
*City/municipal road
*Barangay road

The introduction of route numbers and more specific national road classes
also meant reconsidering how we should use classifications. I agree trunk
would include the major national roads that form critical links between
cities and provinces, but I disagree with the present usage of primary.
There are many usages of the primary tag on roads classified as provincial
and below, which is not reflective of actual traffic patterns. It was
previously proposed in 2009 that primary should be restricted to the
national roads (see
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2010-January/001693.html),
but the plan seems to have stalled.

The proposal I have considered, which largely adapted from the conventions
in Canada and Australia, is:

*Trunk - major national roads that connect major cities (population 100k+),
and forms the national transportation backbone. Usually 1 to 2-digit
routes, or the primary national roads.
*Primary - all other national roads that connect other cities and
municipalities not served by the national road network,  In urban areas,
they form the other major cross-town routes. Usually 3-digit routes, or
secondary national roads.
*Secondary - In rural areas, roads that link municipalities to the primary
network. In urban areas, they are minor arteries, which are not numbered
national roads nor barangay roads, and, connects barangays/districts to the
primary network.
*Tertiary - In rural areas, roads that connect barangays into the secondary
roads and higher. In urban areas, collector roads that are generally at the
heart of a barangay or district.
* Unclassified - All other roads that do not fit tertiary or residential.

The system is largely based on usage over official designation, as matching
OSM's road classes with the Philippine government road designations is far
illogical, as they do not clearly convey their main traffic usage. Our
previous two guidelines basically follow the same principle, but are quite
flawed.

I am also considering eliminating the "living street" classification from
the existing guidelines, but I have my second thoughts, especially for
narrow ones that a typical motorcycle can enter.

Some open questions:

1. How should we classify roads like Daang Hari, C-6/Laguna Lakeshore
Highway, and C-5 Extension, which are major intercity routes but not
national roads?

2. How should bypasses and diversion routes of national roads be classified?
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [Talk-at] Änderung von Bezirks- und Gemeindenamen in Tirol und Vorarlberg

[andreas wecer]

Am Do., 10. Okt. 2019 um 07:27 Uhr schrieb Johann Haag :

> Bereits seit mehreren Tagen beschäftigt mich eine Instabilität von OSM
> Nominatim. Beispiel Bizauer Straße 25a in der Gemeinde Bizau.
> Ich vermute nun, dass es zwischen diesen Problemen, und den von mir
> hinzugefügten Präfixen möglicherweise einen Zusammenhang gibt. Ich bin mir
> hierbei aber noch nicht ganz sicher. Bisher konnte ich folgende Logik
> feststellen. Ein Haus Nr. 25 wird gefunden
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Bizauer%20Straße%2025#map=19/47.36808/9.93703
> 
>  ein
> Haus 25a hingegen nicht.
> Grüße Johann Haag
>

"Bizauer Straße" entspricht schon einmal gar nicht der von dir angegebenen
Adresse, denn die lautet "Oberdorf 25a, 6874 Bizau". Das wird von Nominatim
allerdings genauso nicht gefunden, weil es keinen Ort "Oberdorf" in der
Nähe gibt, aber bspw. von komoot oder magic earth.
Der Straßenname funktioniert bei Nominatim wohl nur eher zufällig weil
offenbar trotz angegebenen addr:place (oder weil eben dieser nicht gefunden
wird) auch die nächstgelegene Straße zugewiesen wird und die ist bei der
25a eben nicht die Bizauer Straße, sondern "Winkel", entsprechend findet
Nominatim auch ein "Winkel 25a, Bizau"
___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at