Re: [Talk-us] United States Bicycle Route System ballot(s) pending AASHTO approval
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, September 18, 2020 1:53 PM, stevea wrote: > There are at least four new national bicycle routes "pending" in the USBRS! > (Ballots by state Departments of Transportation before AASHTO's Autumn 2020 > round): > USBR 201 in Maryland. This one has now been completed. The way is only good in one direction (east-to-west), however, and doesn't take into account the dual carriageways along the way. I like to see the nice, pretty straight line on the relation so I'm not sure if a separate relation is needed for going the opposite direction (east bound) or if one should just tag the other side of the road where applicable. In any case, this is done for the most part. - Sparks -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: ProtonMail wsFzBAEBCAAGBQJfaQElACEJEIB2q94CS7PRFiEECXyCw1LfxkpQwuOjgHar 3gJLs9FBoxAAxdDm3nCQ7Ht0RF723jEh6hRSp8810f/BdrqrS1UTxFFqnCUI uoP510wGFmLBHXXp73JvNg3MvqvXvn9QVBvrZs230+TzASNFpuw2gr47pojx 5hOt/9R69CUjNLhw+4cNVzpkEfvfPa1oJ+ySxdKtySULzkg/JehWfVL1CDQV 82JrC4AjWs0wWgoVFJkuM8GcskuRUxaVR/jffYhXP6dYVbVHM9bOD/4nbRRz nQ+fctc6pqwcueHKGPgqOFG/u1HVmFHXM0HaFV+ri3GDJFIdPizaHllI6Q30 yKorEzsZVUe2sSokoD1JfqXKmSxiTXtWmh1AXZ521SWPIEMlZpzPhzhtQEV5 nJWLsxQLOvY95XU7F6JgPFvbivGILNePjfj6vqudgGpcJC6J1o2rVc48oT1D Tx13FghKoFnUJIiVrwhVUooESadjJ3fFUoEMTv1cf6dxCdCtnJeDpK6NYtmS ecz54I7KEbK2SIf38snecTzCWpxTqqh+h1Z6YPXhK1dz67j+mAgp7G6yruJi aTjnx5qX+IvOn0NzNiYfGzaVK/bb3GRTpl6w5aymhNV03ltpLMHpqofcUeuP Yh3GTAJg5xTzhikE631EpR//MiB/lNmZOahRUT6Go8MXCwIvOFdvUQxnTdK4 FTVNXpXHd0V/QuGOnkR6dGzCk3EVaVQ+RJI= =v376 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] Mapping the Future I-87?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 For the last few months, I've been seeing "Future I-87" signs along portions of US-64 and US-17 in North Carolina. I-87[0] exists on a section of highway near Raleigh, NC, and will eventually extend to Norfolk, VA. Should I start a relation for "Future I-87" and add those sections of highway that are already known to be part of the project to the relation? Thanks, Eric "Sparks" [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_87_(North_Carolina) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: ProtonMail wsFzBAEBCAAGBQJfQt1cACEJEIB2q94CS7PRFiEECXyCw1LfxkpQwuOjgHar 3gJLs9EUjA//ZBY8eSZoXnTN2ByudvCW06VeICe4rsqsGiZCtengmk4X1Lpr 3kn/+FmIU3q9Xf7UN2Ymsj6vhJFphCFqDhYFx91mSRWYzylIG4HYne9uNaNt wmQ7OF4k2ioFHoQYJikz7JaLQ1F4ugke7Oy5n7sqdXgeP2oNqfVVVURtyVKt 1h3m1mR5hgjuudxQPONwV6TJ2gX+XBIeKjEAdHXLo6Ock4rdcg5ZCL8kmxZx izRdqt9UQiyhi8ZQJ8L72LnhRQuHez13c4X3hKNBz79IQlLoXGC4TZECrcUy apfhn/YjvQ4MDs9dhQl+cEQ7W3Mq/+OOZZCfg0YUsaPxBpFtsiH+JEEjImwP aDaHXbjWteAUqT8LkDQntI5Otv3JEt31xI668OfMPQJqn3vYrpEH7qXKMCQu p8i5gn0ispeDKJUpsP1toxN6Esc4SwL6R+DJdHfm4EcrxUd0+FwJ2vmkYqrz uvY6deYg/S6fPDIbTselRKKcAC7t0CUtBFDsY2vyboSwclWvqB91V9SLc2W3 DNFEfY8QLn4HIFBeF+fOAw0vuYSz+KEjoE7CWY0HRv8BPdT7JyXsimUydTkT EZb2i4UqLtkN+vacfsLzPnLplj/xEk5dgbdnAM92bIpHz9Ni3I2QxRuvsQYD qWexjkVJJYmWX7yWtpc1LMDeLJ7soCJLPOg= =bv1B -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] Marking structure as damaged or condemned
Tropical Storm Isaias left several homes in my neighborhood severely damaged and condemned. Is there a proper way to map these structures? Thanks, Eric ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] access=private on driveways
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, July 14, 2020 10:15 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > The (possible) problem with having access implied by service=driveway is > that a lot of access roads to stores/businesses/offices are also > service=driveway... although I suppose you could argue these have the > same semantics; you shouldn't be using them unless you're actually going > to the location to which they provide access. (Which isn't to say that > no one ever violates this...) This ^^^ is, I believe, the crux of the matter. Driveways shouldn't (or should rarely be) access=private as they are actually access=destination. There are obvious times when you WANT someone to use your driveway. Are there times to mark a highway=* as access=private? Sure. But I don't think driveways should be, by default, thought of as private when they are expected to be used by people with a valid need to access the property. I believe that's what access=destination was designed for. It works on driveways and it works on neighborhood streets in gated communities (keeps the router from trying to route through the neighborhood) if my understanding is correct (at least it's worked well for me). R, Eric "Sparks" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: ProtonMail wsFcBAEBCAAGBQJfDccYAAoJEIB2q94CS7PRBPMQAMxSnFlcZIkyCBUGT4Gf U1n/O7OpZxDGSsNmWgD14xbJnOhQUuE75wWibnpioAnDTkSaxr+QuBLp9k/q LDzezu7zIFIkZNGWtG0AopR1H9cHbWFX4MnjgObIxonIKsSAxEjGjhhJeSge EfL8AE5CkcQQF8GWtqipnhQbWP+sIbrSfCdJKXiIbzfP6lXvAqUY0DPUQTsg SFD2nFUYwIkcV88ez2tEvBjtIzwBh0gSboLe14/fRSyAT1nl5Y8YRxbsfyY0 Q7ilBSz8BMLXH52afhnPaARbf7usYu1JBUbASiLoCN4eKZwVxNasZzawsVG/ guRnUsSSPdkWmu5AtJ4DPStbp3PbvBYVEue6V9Y7XHzFLqBckkP4lvhxXzKo n7A7Dga6i/l6aFAjyishAio4PzNqBk8LXOrXBQCjv4ChmKvJx96sGiXasz5V TQ2BQbV1z5pdd19DmSPwfseYmpYP/1wWsjIWi1BxBUVZh0QPNVLj32x9uG4Q FywjoR76EP59LS6wYinrxL5ndip42DevxRnKaG906lalQnEbwKlFpmsIg9bw wO1fF8Mx9JOawcYlUiX0JLq59nzPdR38AXjfrFHshoOQs6Ynn8z3fZBPsIAF R7nJaKT6rw3Uc0ONFgX6k3ApjYvEm0j8G9IkSHaM7Xmcgn7RTyvm8EWx6Uem QeTd =wdt9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Updating opening_hours for COVID-19.
Sure, I get that. The flip side is that it is likely to get confusing what is open and when with all the changes occurring. It would be good to have a resource to help people determine where they can go if they need something. Eric Original Message On Mar 19, 2020, 10:06, Rihards wrote: > On 19.03.20 15:49, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: >> On 3/13/20 15:36, Eric Christensen via Talk-us wrote: >>> I've been updating the opening_hours for businesses and services as I >>> hear about them closing or changing their hours of operation for >>> COVID-19. I'm also adding a note in the description with any >>> information the source is providing. >>> >>> Seems like a good idea to keep people updated to what's open and what's not. >>> >>> I wonder if anyone else is also doing this as well? >> >> Bad idea since these are emergency changes and unlikely to be permanent. >> I am putting in the "normal" hours where they are known, with the >> understanding that people should know locations will be changing their >> hours because of the situation and OSM's data will by necessity be out >> of date for this item. > > I decided not to do that pretty quickly - we will have a huge number of > changes later, as I expect many places to not just change their > permanent hours, but close. > -- > Rihards > > ___ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Wilderness areas separate from forest?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Sorry for the late entry to the discussion but I did have a little information to add here. Wilderness, at least at the federal level, enjoys a different protection from that of a national forest. There is to be no development or tree harvesting in such areas and even wildfire management may be different. I wouldn't necessarily start combining the two together as they are managed differently and have different purposes and landuse protections. Eric "Sparks" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: ProtonMail wsFcBAEBCAAGBQJeC7ILAAoJEIB2q94CS7PRxsUP/3U96edPZ2FWSN6TnqjU 4THwLHaUHz2qOQTNjm0Ctef7BZbDgck7omAELU2OJUpYELoU71vvqu9PRvI0 YMupqUoHf41jU7RZ0VIZglq9hCo5/SZDJ7MMghNQ6ANewF00bUsFToVWltJp hGT/07jw5Tz6gdZ/b5B9J9VLDqz4w5CXOCjMmhhY3LJ9kyn6E8DkBQa7seSV lIHc8WuEIs127wpMuIQAfykg9BEEBy/3suIpUSzF6YR5Nb6uTn3KQifGFoP0 XwMUR7cKcMrdz/j8PW24rpazrbA3UmelcbA7pasOPd3Z8icHRCxhBilWIQt2 bIIPU9Q8809pxwTKpY8hHizl6lWTjnvLcdG4JG8L7G9PidnC3gl64HMtN4YF 5e8A2qUrYycm27meWMlhGr/R3wDUtkJd343uZn7OCAK2qUR5Ms5wA0MYCT7j 40l5e52JQ6TbcrVMzmzfuioE+i06BZ7sCsTOySl3PtC/YP1hjQc+lHyi2MpQ EzUKJbUnjGH2in2mimJUxq9rq3xCEGQMTmXws7fnF7AlWuOShg+kDaWvwj9G Fi5f+TrBuKGgdPFAIgDcpVnKWgtWkGxIvV0h6l1mCpFCRi+mT8COHp8SBOAq DB7PpqspjCrAkKafzsIvHf0wfTWaQt+4XJvFjrhVRGFWxFQUPJJpj6Bq1g05 BbSJ =AFMX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Trunk VS primary,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, December 19, 2019 2:19 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > I actually like your suggestion that highway=trunk does not add much value to > the U.S. map, Eric. > We love to add detail / granularity to OSM so much, it can become hard to > envisage taking some away. > Not saying we should abolish trunk right here and now, but something I'd > consider as one outcome. It does seem like there is a lot of arbitrary conditions separating some of these road types. It would be nice to have solid reasoning for tagging a roadway a certain way instead of how "important" it is. The routing engine should be able to take into account the road surface, number of stop lights, and other factors into consideration if there are multiple routes of similar highways that are "important", IMO. Any idea why trunk was established in the first place? --Sparks -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: ProtonMail wsFcBAEBCAAGBQJd+93IAAoJEIB2q94CS7PRz34QALpd+bUfV2YniWX9qVtb nzFxEsdPp8dzt/s4HewS93wDtSrVKM7rtuPLTnDetFrI4Yl5bZ3JfkrDRfDR KkxYbgU1/Fjrjz/MCJ+aoDh0SwKVwSUDMpX9nJtNxNHfaqjxu6Z86eKLcBX1 ceAUnTMoUQfDnWSH3TUPadQOkwij1r0Ja2EreKuSJwMk+geGs8qlVU0sNf0x 3KooDARDgIvTbul1344kt0QceK42py0P4RjqRsFJnjg9cCGa07BD1pb6R+qk 2xWL9Q0cCnbF/mhCQ1LoQvIzdgQl/4jvccQ7vyBwgkqbg1f63X0dDbQMPT6F mRtZ6almPUg0XP0jO33s7JKruMuO4OaJhMYY7h4N1EscjiDcm1zXzz5OCsXP 2QEKnSDkP6h0DAGL58A3rmI0c8z9qAUT+kVrLU1nJDb4WhUsNcpch87Rswi3 w9VFKBEAYVuD9EwJN37e8xG21SO289alvb1hVGzI914aovSbOElluDrQ3F8p yyD8d7m2wEebEjNzaKRHXVTC1bsiBzruZiUZt9K69Cxv5m3YJHW7giPagKEW V/o6kwBJOrXnwtF9U/AZCA+EhPF7Myb2tfMdPsWzr0kq4Yy0vfb9V7Y7Ldnw MlTc8QtIRUfjejWGV2mXDPxghGQ50YGnipG4NjVuSOhhs/yO3ZDOB0pDorxF VtwA =uMfV -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Alaska Highway AK-2 tagging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, December 16, 2019 8:21 PM, Anthony Costanzo wrote: > Given how these and other major > single-carriageway roads in northern and western Canada are tagged as > Trunk, tagging AK 2 as such would seem to be the option that defers to > regional precedent. Given the discussion we've had so far, unless there is strong opposition to doing so, I'm going to updating the tagging of AK-2 to 'trunk' from Canada to Eielson AFB for consistency. This is what it's tagged in the Yukon and, as SteveA points out, the differences between Trunk and Primary are little. This has been a very good discussion, though. R, Eric Sparks -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: ProtonMail wsFcBAEBCAAGBQJd+DJ4AAoJEIB2q94CS7PRk9QP/1r2BJ0oXsDgko/ohA9a EWDUgL+cR01GSBak4wJmSBXyFaeoOKcBEPRMsPq0iLE4VOXjkycJy9GwuXdr ojYF1wc7xADtdpUkZ08D2EttJEVbMM4UDSDHIIEQjaQD8mnthN0afnrIiVSI Icmr54t/UlieoIl4LCyyzrzn5O1vTXgLZWjcP7jcpK49Arvsrwm2ZB4TVUEa PJSVBjfQTM++mCG1ERr/L65abEETydYSvLT8e1TEAnbP/qYdta/nqDyGoEun O9annjr1XTfk8FcUAaAIzE/kFUQNOkMQ0q9dMl2HduWfAKHlIP3+b7UgrXdl o5gxXDuOKT9S35KVMOle4v5WW1la6rdoX3bm6uGKO5s8WgG6tvusCRURbXhE d3tEC5mNQh4tg2n+J/KX3xYxIK1v++7PxXuvIK4j+xDzbFmy3ynzWt2BgeG/ bWxy2BsPYiEpc9TD54LTroMIB3Qsg7YhMWbjxe1IMpKQIrqa1NitGTQdZadd af9ge15T9iiN0PKfGpf86/t1l/I/ABhROQPwdguCbJExobPNuBSz6DiyFAZU j+1UeIxTGr2mh6AMUVioxO3hoPb+YxrPIF3H6mpk7AtlSOHlX7C4a8Paoprb K1wGieDEbS71yxLmTfJE7qPrSMcvDh8SDqiORB3ODng+4A2ZTBEp0QCPeNqU lpjE =yYTA -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Alaska Highway AK-2 tagging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, December 16, 2019 7:35 PM, Tod Fitch wrote: > My reading of the wiki indicates that for the United States a trunk is “a > high speed Arterial Divided highway that is partially grade separated.” [1] > > What is the problem with having the main road between regions/cities/towns > being “primary”? Do you like the rendering of trunk better? > > For myself if I planned a driving trip and was expecting a trunk road I’d > sure be surprised to find areas that are undivided and apparently, from other > responses in this thread, unpaved in sections. > > [1] > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Road_classification#Trunk I haven't seen that wiki page before. Looking at the trunk page[0], the highway need not be divided and the U.S.-specific portion says "Surface expressway: A relatively high-speed divided road (at least 40 MPH with a barrier or median separating each direction of traffic), with a limited amount of intersections and driveways; or a major intercity highway. This includes many U.S. Highways (that do not parallel an Interstate) and some state highways.". To me that meets the requirement for AK-2. [0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk --Eric "Sparks" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: ProtonMail wsFcBAEBCAAGBQJd+CzBAAoJEIB2q94CS7PRypkP/RAFBNJ6CdK+ANv9HfQR 5K3wbuqfzB1xkXWEiZf0aVAEvLz7p3z5ZlGUUsTHxbSfUv0IY9IWtSWLerty tabpC1lsu0HM+JQCKcG5qvgtg38TLWMGUGEduODIgu9+9GmgD9Dd1KV1IS8s ujZteX5OMM35M3h3vmCLaEjvjO2fQzXzfPZxOX1gfWoPLTg36UFu+90Ppxlk vGhGvjehnqs8gbNaKtr+K4fNT1NeLsrna0/Hs3mxeeGXZGK+9c4FG/1S0fOJ PCyKFw0+R6DHIcVTgw/EjCWlF19wJvxJm4yr4/pNrQdG3gDdduX/gb8Gi5le P5h4KzSerMNonPdSLIvEcXC3AS2jvovyXbYvKMKC4rUF2emh/BMxr8Bu7kc+ FuNPZxDgg7jbS0yYrajpKQ086uyFYhKy1MyRAJ/RSrQm5l+r4QeopBCcnJSQ UsBZ6fz0E9fG8ZigOdUDQJBAgTUh0mXoQ1YMQsTWevS47J9Lfg8+Fb4WuwPm d4zJtTuzHm9IqRb+C0GfII3ghadKVW8ZGmucg6/uXGVp75Zd4z6Qr5ipcHcM nVXRxhofUDge4bc4UK/OBHsENK9b82y0jQQGY77B3+PBL6Nvcbwy5yXzTKlk AW/JzarZ5sPIGZiHq4xbZLNOmgXNmr4O+GOR9ersK7f2Do/aLIaqImdVdIK4 NHnB =6urk -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] Alaska Highway AK-2 tagging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I've noticed that there is some mixed tagging of the Alaska Highway AK-2 from the Canadian border through Delta Junction to where it becomes a divided highway just south and east of Fairbanks at Eielson Air Force Base. Some of the non-divided portions are tagged as trunk while the other (majority) is tagged as primary. The definitions of these two tags are similar enough in the U.S. to almost be interchangeable. Being that this highway links many villages with Canada and the City of Fairbanks and the speed limit is 65 MPH, I would lean towards this highway being tagged as trunk. By the same definition, I'd probably argue the same for the Richardson Highway AK-4. Thoughts? R, Eric "Sparks" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: ProtonMail wsFcBAEBCAAGBQJd+BStAAoJEIB2q94CS7PR7d4QAMWWtHe8EB3ALRrczWY/ f3kpdRyYqP8QYVvc1vdvu+j/hAP8NdFGb+aDLx2YLMerDEu4Lt7B0BMN78vT LD5629ujwkViIpv8AQt97iWLlruEZOczn44Yhr7KIV6itzmmd9VXfXMs8Kzj gOVFdmABwgJd3S/7/tDavgsM49Bh1nvYHkzdUdBwoZ9MuCQbFpoIdj2EPc/W Z/XDDssBUcxDIzWaa8kDWB/FlizE+5v6QkgULiB4c7grEbg/7fNziisdYAWp lwAqkirEFLsYInrtc80bfkHX0pgb8AtFFZnyDyrY3ijU23Y2Qz5o1qn+4jbS PwFCgO6z771vGw3J+RCmKuhOG3fjyW//X0OmtUkAPdiSWKNsPabLlG4/FWib phl+2IDx0wlHqYITBEGRGw6pq96chIinlHzdWNmC82/fGI0IXo1Ic9/r3S2v Uzr8bwATdLl6mRhYZjAvcLg8yHKblG0PvINjwN4exAthSi+qGsoM5bYDBi8V sccUBA0pypUPWCnOVtck4EmMdIJ63b++EoKQ0DUNMGDkpaac6ErKOXDdVt97 ySbzNzfkkAyproGrwmDLeVQ8gt8aoc0vjlQUZpOoKDcuXgZ7mIhWmwn+4kLL WTYYuZn02MVoAsdfbfPB3IyNy9eqmadymFlyNL8AfJC69/0S1TAGLtQFoJjv wQlY =oEIv -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Proper way to "close" a ferry route
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, September 9, 2019 11:20 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > I would also remove route=ferry tag. > > I assume here that "temporary" means > "closed for at least week or two", > with closer closure I have doubts about > mapping it in OSM. No, I suspect this might be a while longer. NC-12 for several miles along the east portion of Ocracoke island was buckled by the ocean and a bridge on the island is missing. Repairs from last year's hurricane hadn't even been completed although the roadway had been opened. I suspect this will be a closure of at least a month if not more. I'll go ahead and remove the route=ferry as well. I've also marked the roadway as being "under construction" to prevent any routing that far east although if you've made it onto the island you probably know already. Thanks, Eric -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: ProtonMail wsFcBAEBCAAGBQJddnyBAAoJEIB2q94CS7PR62YQALCF17g+XZmCI6I2vhDS 9jw6LKAgbX7M/ZwbDEDoGMPYsWk9e6LiTgA9i59iTWrCFtZ3vAb4NI3zkMhf nRCcmHdjvK1tFjPt+xEEkTCMWqjiObRxCIjBY0MzfjhrSA81w/FZedDYc0Mm gp3RoRHXzeL5vFniP8F9pMkrMsKnGb3Y6ZvLD4xBFDo4ZstSwEl6t6JIZQny y86JmstpiFZi7n26pr8kGIJAduv/MbtgD4f3PrjEe142SBnjL1/iamDH58Jn 3YYNDyvF8AXSZRAEC04WyiXSk2/NgEdUi8fonTZG3046/wd/kf6hA5Sr7mxW rRpyh5gRFr1SigS017pdnBEulF+CyP2/Ko1qwL5alU24vatbyA/TdXcPKROt EqskOfG8N2hfbmmDBdJROQOMswYgem0AoEJLh/p7/ehMy5d8g4t3y4WciZdD X/0xBtUHv5nJ92IHn87HStG21dfak0G+eyLel+YHIHY7UvvUzBYVLsrIastk QGXwpoahquXTMuVNhQ1HMXKdN6NvD1WCXYqW+HeecPIwp2NrPlWdX4zf43ho iLWu5ijel/MKeX3gWu1dQfaPjOSnNMk/TJa9C8Zt1yRnqKvLyeJ2F03gdvUh VtNAGaJ/uTdhvHgU4qOBsnS0NVUd96BA29HmhmmB8+V9WVna88dIFIXu9FSf HuK0 =k6M1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Website showing the best time to survey with GPS.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, June 27, 2019 7:58 AM, Simon Poole wrote: > The answer the OP was looking for is likely https://www.gnssplanning.com/ Thank you!!! My Google-fu has been failing me lately. Eric -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: ProtonMail Comment: https://protonmail.com wsFcBAEBCAAGBQJdFLHDAAoJEIB2q94CS7PRrtsP/3moRTHbGoIqMyQGrLQ7 3Qw4XVt7hrTmxzjaKTGK6p5hHYRR6tyhLrhA/IBL/LOORgkIp2AkcCb7eIYZ sn9vJhbhvluV8l2GyT1Tle3hVMGXfE4nj9OQOfLkkJ7jltSHy5+tFt6spQc5 nht9bANCTG76tFlBQR1gB+tUC8/0pm1KUwQQwwr0tmR4aEW90hEvkZ/Ld/8O oT8/466Ec7rj/AFI1UZ19RuTtxYhd8uPAMb3prSg4K6tFBcys8KMIFzyzbhB OTS/yldk09wRu81S6+fXwH142UHO8m0dIQXBZSNqrBqAfijPNgNrFL0Ao4nJ PI5QwQXoUOJzlLvqHKiQihLohM1RyL/f1CCpg1nWKMR1fIc1dZbx87h0tf9/ NG6VNN+iIvkVwEhY/mP/7BPUP1aXKXRiujGJ4G+lbU3xVjaQHouYRMMsoXaq 3StZJCxfQdx6dOw7Zx+dzQtBZlxic6A8PncYvVgqW45FSa2nh35vMm2a4deJ khVlt9PhXAvtADBnO77ub3XsiQpGAsAaPN/lshY9Yjv0kvp8vfGvmoNlwHgC BjXdcXsZ20puf53kzq0x3ssL47bzuyykWtcpbl79gFEEYPToB/Dil5euwNsq VZ/1GeSSqKQVrJx+KUR0yEgUuUto55rTUd6D0J32D7mC6q/4VHokVBqX5G5c ZgiS =IJeN -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Website showing the best time to survey with GPS.
I use GPSr devices other than what's in my smartphone. The point is that if all the satellites are clustered directly overhead the diversity isn't great enough to give a truly accurate position on the ground. For best surveying with a GPSr, you want satellites to not only be overhead but toward the horizon (and everywhere in between) as well. Eric ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, June 27, 2019 2:15 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > Note that for a typical GPS, especially GPS in smartphone I would expect that > this effects will be not really noticeable in affecting accuracy. > > Maybe except massive solar storms like > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm_of_1859 > > I tried to check sources, but quick search found nothing really good, except > some things > like > https://www.utdallas.edu/news/2013/5/16-23761_Solar-Flares-May-Interrupt-GPS-Navigation-Research_article-wide.html > "If a flare is particularly large, the resulting turbulence in our upper > atmosphere > could disrupt radio signals and GPS navigation, for example." > > what seems to confirm that you need really unusual activity to have results. > > 27 Jun 2019, 00:18 by talk-us@openstreetmap.org: > >> I was told there was a website that forecasted the best times to do survey >> work with GNSS based upon diversity of satellites in the sky, solar >> activity, etc. Does anyone know what site this is? >> >> Thanks, >> Eric___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] Website showing the best time to survey with GPS.
I was told there was a website that forecasted the best times to do survey work with GNSS based upon diversity of satellites in the sky, solar activity, etc. Does anyone know what site this is? Thanks, Eric___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Gated communities
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, March 20, 2019 6:38 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Should all roads inside the gated community be access=private? I wouldn't necessarily mark all the roads as private as I think that would hinder the routing engines. > What tags should be applied to (a) the main gate where visitors and > delivery services are expected to report, and (b) resident-only gates? I've mapped a neighborhood like this before and I think I got the routing to work properly by using gates at non-manned areas with access=private and something else at the guard houses with access=designated or something to that affect. I think that fits the model... Eric "Sparks" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: ProtonMail Comment: https://protonmail.com wsFcBAEBCAAGBQJcksYxAAoJEIB2q94CS7PREZoQALxqnyFgf57KuZ8btd9G Rh/ttSnL2ut/P3JBddk++vM3qvxD0N6dAEQDF5X1mMYvYtwkjJ3JUm5WeFSL MTt3teOV1KIJWb7fk8VsysJUatz3Q3Ksty9fevG1t5W2l+9tkXn6eNzMIL5c Ztdabtgrlx/6I04IpQnPcqAjJUh48g5aQYCitfMQf3A/67/CRt0YnsYEa/79 0WmOUmtxLSDdofwOwi3g6CCma6oWiAttnrCfHLQhqbALSlM9e0+VLGICT2ma c3eV0tzE7qvv6Xw3ngos6uVwsnJ5ppnslBax+ZDyRlc5De0ka+XAep/VWJQc oU5Yd6gYj+7xiP+loFRLQoOR2gPSf1C/nPIVBKiD0tWgiEkPK/zHA8jA6C83 a+ZR+BNZ5LXQsSbHGn/4R5jyXBmRSRlsQ3UajVfcaDOteRKsvW2zNQUxQJn/ uzCPE6H1ZkuMjNzr2qT4/IT8TXc8Qyx+rZB/q0OiJfFa1QofNOmy9rsXkxzm bDdcH+swBAe6eXz1snM/hYW8HDn0aba/TPYCK5+q5B3D9ynrIH9HktPVcIs9 wbt4/+qhBe4bxihA5A2vntZyrQJeHqObiMHvN8a4Zs1AiMvzEw70JAth6uYo 0oNrFCnHC3GZrEHZzyyGK/pjKlcevupEn4NIUZvWO1T6ph3rMLiAr241eSSy xykO =y2bt -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Anyone interested in fixing Pine Mountain Trail, FDR state park, GA?
I can do it. Sounds right up my alley...
Eric "Sparks"
Original Message
On Feb 6, 2019, 02:56, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> DWG has received a message from someone at the "Pine Mountain Trail
> Association Board", pointing out several mis-named trails and offering
> to explain further in a telephone call ("CALL ME, not email me, not text
> me"). He's also offering to send a trail map which may be used to take
> correct names from.
>
> He's mixing up OSM and AllTrails and it is not clear whether he refers
> to particular AllTrails issues or genuine OSM issues, though with
> AllTrails using OSM data it is likely that at least some of the issues
> are OSM. He also complains about incorrect mileage shown but that is
> most likely an AllTrails issue.
>
> Would someone be interested in taking up the matter, making the phone
> call, potentially receiving a trail map and fixing what needs to be
> fixed in OSM, if anything? Then I'd forward the message. I'm not posting
> it because it contains telephone numbers and names.
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
> --
> Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
