Re: [Talk-at] Way: 357911189

2019-08-10 Diskussionsfäden forster

Friedrich
Thanks for your comments
I changed waterway=riverbank to natural=scree
The map already had 2 river channels indicating a braided stream
I referenced our conversation in the changeset comments.
Tony


On 06.08.19 04:40, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Way: 357911189 renders as a lake, in reality it is a scree   
slope/gravel bed with a braided stream running through it.


It is tagged waterway riverbank. Do you have any suggestions  
for better tagging?


This should be micro-mapped from aerial images. You need to compare
images from different years to see which parts of the area are
frequently changing, and which are not.
natural=scree seems fine for most oft that area. The green parts are
certainly natural=fell. waterway=riverbank is ok on the area around  E
11.6636714 / N 47.0004158, which is covered most of the time by the
varying branches of the stream.

I have never been to that region, but in general the alpine waterways
carry a lot more water in spring and early summer due to snowmelt. You
don't see these water levels in aerial images because they are taken
when the snow is gone. So it's possible that waterway=riverbank is
correct on a bigger area, but then it should be accompanied by
intermittent=yes. See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ephemeral for
ideas how to specify the season.

The waterway=stream itself should be adapted to the latest aerial
image. This may by outdated anyway, but it's still better than what is
mapped by now.

--
Friedrich K. Volkmann   http://www.volki.at/
Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria

___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

_
This mail has been virus scanned by Australia On Line
see http://www.australiaonline.net.au/mailscanning






___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at


Re: [Talk-at] Way: 357911189

2019-08-05 Diskussionsfäden Friedrich Volkmann

On 06.08.19 04:40, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Way: 357911189 renders as a lake, in reality it is a scree slope/gravel bed 
with a braided stream running through it.


It is tagged waterway riverbank. Do you have any suggestions for better 
tagging?


This should be micro-mapped from aerial images. You need to compare images 
from different years to see which parts of the area are frequently changing, 
and which are not.
natural=scree seems fine for most oft that area. The green parts are 
certainly natural=fell. waterway=riverbank is ok on the area around  E 
11.6636714 / N 47.0004158, which is covered most of the time by the varying 
branches of the stream.


I have never been to that region, but in general the alpine waterways carry 
a lot more water in spring and early summer due to snowmelt. You don't see 
these water levels in aerial images because they are taken when the snow is 
gone. So it's possible that waterway=riverbank is correct on a bigger area, 
but then it should be accompanied by intermittent=yes. See 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ephemeral for ideas 
how to specify the season.


The waterway=stream itself should be adapted to the latest aerial image. 
This may by outdated anyway, but it's still better than what is mapped by now.


--
Friedrich K. Volkmann   http://www.volki.at/
Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria

___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at


[Talk-at] Way: 357911189

2019-08-05 Diskussionsfäden forster

Hi
Excuse me for posting in English

Way: 357911189 renders as a lake, in reality it is a scree  
slope/gravel bed with a braided stream running through it.


It is tagged waterway 	riverbank. Do you have any suggestions for  
better tagging?


Tony
(Australia)



___
Talk-at mailing list
Talk-at@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at