Re: [talk-au] Wild guess surveying

2008-12-16 Thread Sam Couter
80n <80n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A straight line between two places is better than no line.

A straight line is at least topograhically correct, which for road
navigation is incredibly useful.
-- 
Sam Couter |  mailto:s...@couter.id.au
OpenPGP fingerprint:  A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05  5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Wild guess surveying

2008-12-16 Thread 80n
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Darrin Smith  wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:35:01 +0900
> "Andrew Laughton"  wrote:
>
> > Yes, very easy to fix, and I have fixed other roads that were also
> > wrong, the worry is, how many others need fixing and where are they.
> > Maybe a polite message could solve the problem, or maybe a rough
> > position is better than no position, and there is no problem.
>
> I think there's actually 2 issues you've hit on in this. One you
> outline here and the other is the issue of what the original author
> used as a source for the estimation.
>
> On the issue you have listed here I'd suggest at some level it would
> be a good thing to have rough estimations drawn in, at least for major
> features (which landsat can provide if nothing else), an empty block of
> map just doesn't help anyone at all really. Data can always get more
> accurate as time goes by as someone with more specific information
> refines the paths, much like you are doing in this case. When new data
> obviously over-rides older data in the map people should not have
> hesitation correcting things.
>

Incremental improvement is the wiki-way.  And even what we consider to be
good mapping at the moment will get improved over time as better technology
and better sources come along.

A straight line between two places is better than no line.

80n



>
> The other issue is a potentially nastier one, especially given that
> landsat supports something approximating the traces you made in this
> case, I worry that your suspicions may be correct, or perhaps that the
> person who drew it in based it upon personal experience from a long
> time ago (dodgy source at best ;). I think a polite message suggesting
> that you are concerned about the source of his data might not go astray
> in this case.
>
> --
> Darrin Smith
> s...@salseast.org
>
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


[talk-au] Some Photos

2008-12-16 Thread Darrin Smith
Here's a pic of one of those near-mini's I spotted in Gascoyne Avenue,
Hillcrest, I think they to fulfill every criteria of Liz's defintion
except for the different signage (in the first pic you can see the
bottom of the standard sign there).

http://osm.beldin.org/misc/IMG_0121.jpg
http://osm.beldin.org/misc/IMG_0122.jpg

-- 

=b

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au