[talk-au] Trolls

2011-04-30 Thread Nick Hocking
 David Murn stated 

If anyone is interested, I can provide the simple C code I used to
generate these numbers and/or a list of usernames/uids that are
involved.

Well. you'd be a right piece of work then.

Right, get Nearmap to sue every OSMer in sight,   that'd be real clever of
them.

Hang on.. maybe you were just tyring to outdo the other two aus-trolls in
dispiciality inh wich case, congratulations... I believe that you have just
taken a narrow lead.

Nick

PS - tomorrow I will find out all the ways in Canberra  that I had to fix
 using nearmap, and replace them using compliant Bing imagery
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Trolls

2011-04-30 Thread John Smith
On 30 April 2011 20:09, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
 PS - tomorrow I will find out all the ways in Canberra  that I had to fix
  using nearmap, and replace them using compliant Bing imagery

So you wiped out perfectly good map data for sub-standard data?

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Trolls

2011-04-30 Thread Andrew Harvey
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
 PS - tomorrow I will find out all the ways in Canberra  that I had to fix
  using nearmap, and replace them using compliant Bing imagery

Last time I checked the licences, NearMap says that information
derived from their images may (and may only) be released under
CC-BY-SA; Bing on the other hand only say that we can view their
imagery in an OSM editor. They do not explicitly disclaim any
copyright on derived works (like tracing). Sure they say  Any updates
you make to the OpenStreetMap map via the Application (even if not
published to third parties) must be contributed back to
openstreetmaps.org.* but this says nothing about deriving information
from the actual imagery, merely a user making regular submissions to
OSM. Now Microsoft may think that tracing isn't a derived work and as
such you can trace copyrighted imagery without a license, but unless
they actually state this, and have the rights to the imagery, I don't
think we should allow any Bing tracing in OSM.

*btw, this isn't in their
http://www.microsoft.com/maps/product/terms.html only in this special
unverified http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Bing_license.pdf

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Trolls

2011-04-30 Thread David Murn
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 20:09 +1000, Nick Hocking wrote:
  David Murn stated 
  
 If anyone is interested, I can provide the simple C code I used to
 generate these numbers and/or a list of usernames/uids that are
 involved.
  
 Well. you'd be a right piece of work then.
  
 Right, get Nearmap to sue every OSMer in sight,   that'd be real
 clever of them.
  
 Hang on.. maybe you were just tyring to outdo the other two aus-trolls
 in  dispiciality inh wich case, congratulations... I believe that you
 have just taken a narrow lead.

Im not sure what youre suggesting.  NearMap has no interest in suing
anyone, least of all OSM users since OSM is still under a compatible
licence.  What I was 'trying to do' was to point out that there needs to
be a lot more care taken when asking users to relicence the data, and
that the users whos names I could list should be taken off the list of
those accepting the ODbL and CTs.
 
 PS - tomorrow I will find out all the ways in Canberra  that I had to
 fix  using nearmap, and replace them using compliant Bing imagery

Make sure you also survey those roads then so you can replace the tags
you delete while replacing the ways.  If you delete a road which is
tagged as maxspeed=60 and re-trace it from bing, youd better go survey
it in person and re-add all the data youre removing, otherwise YOU are
the one causing problems to the project.  At the very least, can I ask
that if youre going to trace from bing, that you keep an eye on the
imagery alignment as in some parts of Canberra I have found the imagery
to be upto 100m offset.

One might almost consider your efforts vandalism, and a complete waste
of time and effort when you could be tracing areas that arent mapped,
and if you really want to replace all the work others have done, then at
least wait until it has been removed (if it is removed) in future.

David



___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au