Re: [talk-au] Residential road tagging
Bit of a hard one? I've seen one of those streets in this area that each side of the "service road" part is signed "Local traffic only - no through road" In OSM terms, that then could stay as =residential, but with access=destination (or =no?). Without local knowledge of the actual street, & how it may be signed, I'd be inclined to leave these as a mix of =residential & =service Thanks Graeme On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 14:35, David Wales wrote: > Hello! > > I came across an interesting tagging situation while working on this > MapRoulette Challenge: > https://maproulette.org/mr3/browse/challenges/3257 > > At this location, > https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=19/-34.06296/150.76212 > Linum road is tagged as both a residential road, and a service road. > > From the LPI NSW Base Map, I'm pretty sure that both segments are meant > to be Linum Road. However, from the LPI NSW Imagery, I'm not sure if > both should be tagged as residential, or if the current tagging with > part residential and part service road is correct. > > Thoughts? > > Regards, > David Wales > > ___ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
[talk-au] Residential road tagging
Hello! I came across an interesting tagging situation while working on this MapRoulette Challenge: https://maproulette.org/mr3/browse/challenges/3257 At this location, https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=19/-34.06296/150.76212 Linum road is tagged as both a residential road, and a service road. From the LPI NSW Base Map, I'm pretty sure that both segments are meant to be Linum Road. However, from the LPI NSW Imagery, I'm not sure if both should be tagged as residential, or if the current tagging with part residential and part service road is correct. Thoughts? Regards, David Wales signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Question on how to fix this intersection
Yep, bring the split back to where the central island starts alongside the first westbound "turn right" arrow. I'd also suggest aligning the actual road marking with the centre of the road before it splits, then the centre of each side after the split, as that can apparently also help with smoothing routing directions (somehow!). Speed limits & lane counts also need to be corrected! Thanks Graeme On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 09:02, Ian Sergeant wrote: > I agree there should be a better way, but I would solve this problem > by bring the road split to the east of the the intersection in this > case. The road divides on the eastern side of the intersection > anyway. > > Then there will be no option but to continue straight. > > Ian. > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 09:55, Dion Moult wrote: > > > > G'day all! > > > > In the intersection of Liverpool road and Burwood road in Burwood, > Sydney (see attached), if I am travelling in the direction shown by the red > arrow, then my GPS device should tell me to continue and drive straight at > the intersection. However, because at that junction, the map splits up > Liverpool Road into two roads, OSMAnd tells me to turn left there, which is > quite confusing. > > > > What is the appropriate way to fix this mapping? Or is it a problem with > OSMAnd? > > > > > > Dion Moult > > > > > > ___ > > Talk-au mailing list > > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > > ___ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
