Re: [talk-au] Data challenges in Maproulette for AU territories
Can the existing MalformedRoundaboutChecks be disabled/hidden until they are corrected? They're currently still visible and show the incorrect identifications. Thanks, Adam On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 at 05:25, Oisin Herriott (Insight Global Inc) via Talk-au wrote: > Hi all, > > As called out my original post, we have now published the Atlas check > Maproulette challenges for territories of NSW, WA, SA, and NT. These are > posted through our github here, > https://github.com/microsoft/Open-Maps/issues/69. > > Andrew Davidson pointed out the incorrect direction being identified in > relation to MalformedRoundaboutCheck. Having passed on this feedback, it > appears that the check takes into consideration the different sides of the > road travelled in countries. This is based off of a list of ISO country > codes and a tag for iso_country_code, but as these challenges were created > on a territory by territory basis, this was an oversight and will be > updated. Thanks again for the feedback on that. > > Thanks Andrew Harvey for the update on the VIC address import project, it > will be interesting to re-run the atlas check after this is complete and > see what the results are. > > Thanks all, > Oisin > > -Original Message- > From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org > > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 11:59 PM > To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Talk-au Digest, Vol 169, Issue 34 > > Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to > talk-au@openstreetmap.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.openstreetmap.org%2Flistinfo%2Ftalk-audata=04%7C01%7Cv-oiher%40microsoft.com%7C5a14f9d64ab04e3ee30908d950cc7ddd%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637629661641261495%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000sdata=zXw6YN6PBwo6w%2B4RNPX5R8wPBVKMSOa5gh405YU3o%2BU%3Dreserved=0 > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > talk-au-ow...@openstreetmap.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than > "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > >1. Re: Data challenges in Maproulette for AU territories > (Oisin Herriott (Insight Global Inc)) >2. Re: Celebrating 17 years of OSM (Edoardo Neerhut) >3. Re: Roads in Industrial Estates: Residential, Unclassified or > Service? (Graeme Fitzpatrick) >4. Re: Roads in Industrial Estates: Residential, Unclassified or > Service? (Adam Horan) > > > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:23:21 + > From: "Oisin Herriott (Insight Global Inc)" > To: "talk-au@openstreetmap.org" > Subject: Re: [talk-au] Data challenges in Maproulette for AU > territories > Message-ID: > < > mw2pr2101mb185187fd5ecfcc3b1cd07a40e3...@mw2pr2101mb1851.namprd21.prod.outlook.com > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi Andrew, > > As per your message below - > " I think there may be a problem with your MalformedRoundaboutCheck > challenges. It appears that every roundabout in the ACT and VIC has been > flagged. I've checked about 15 so far and none of them have any issues. > > Could you have forgotten that roundabouts are clockwise in AU?" > > Thank you for pointing this out. I took a look and agree, so have fed this > information back to some of the folks who worked on these tasks. The > country's direction o f travel should be considered when looking into the > details of the check on github here, > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fosmlab%2Fatlas-checks%2Fblob%2Fdev%2Fdocs%2Fchecks%2FmalformedRoundaboutCheck.mddata=04%7C01%7Cv-oiher%40microsoft.com%7C5a14f9d64ab04e3ee30908d950cc7ddd%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637629661641271485%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000sdata=BjxwawMPwjJctwBEulm%2FAhDCUD6qWob%2F%2F3SZ27wK8X4%3Dreserved=0. > I can update when I find out more and will also check in other territories > before sending any out on Maproulette until we find out whats happening on > this check. > > Best, > Oisin > > -Original Message- > From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org > > Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2021 4:00 AM > To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Talk-au Digest, Vol 169, Issue 32 > > Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to > talk-au@openstreetmap.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > >
[talk-au] Data challenges in Maproulette for AU territories
Hi all, As called out my original post, we have now published the Atlas check Maproulette challenges for territories of NSW, WA, SA, and NT. These are posted through our github here, https://github.com/microsoft/Open-Maps/issues/69. Andrew Davidson pointed out the incorrect direction being identified in relation to MalformedRoundaboutCheck. Having passed on this feedback, it appears that the check takes into consideration the different sides of the road travelled in countries. This is based off of a list of ISO country codes and a tag for iso_country_code, but as these challenges were created on a territory by territory basis, this was an oversight and will be updated. Thanks again for the feedback on that. Thanks Andrew Harvey for the update on the VIC address import project, it will be interesting to re-run the atlas check after this is complete and see what the results are. Thanks all, Oisin -Original Message- From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 11:59 PM To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Talk-au Digest, Vol 169, Issue 34 Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to talk-au@openstreetmap.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.openstreetmap.org%2Flistinfo%2Ftalk-audata=04%7C01%7Cv-oiher%40microsoft.com%7C5a14f9d64ab04e3ee30908d950cc7ddd%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637629661641261495%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000sdata=zXw6YN6PBwo6w%2B4RNPX5R8wPBVKMSOa5gh405YU3o%2BU%3Dreserved=0 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org You can reach the person managing the list at talk-au-ow...@openstreetmap.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Data challenges in Maproulette for AU territories (Oisin Herriott (Insight Global Inc)) 2. Re: Celebrating 17 years of OSM (Edoardo Neerhut) 3. Re: Roads in Industrial Estates: Residential, Unclassified or Service? (Graeme Fitzpatrick) 4. Re: Roads in Industrial Estates: Residential, Unclassified or Service? (Adam Horan) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:23:21 + From: "Oisin Herriott (Insight Global Inc)" To: "talk-au@openstreetmap.org" Subject: Re: [talk-au] Data challenges in Maproulette for AU territories Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi Andrew, As per your message below - " I think there may be a problem with your MalformedRoundaboutCheck challenges. It appears that every roundabout in the ACT and VIC has been flagged. I've checked about 15 so far and none of them have any issues. Could you have forgotten that roundabouts are clockwise in AU?" Thank you for pointing this out. I took a look and agree, so have fed this information back to some of the folks who worked on these tasks. The country's direction o f travel should be considered when looking into the details of the check on github here, https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fosmlab%2Fatlas-checks%2Fblob%2Fdev%2Fdocs%2Fchecks%2FmalformedRoundaboutCheck.mddata=04%7C01%7Cv-oiher%40microsoft.com%7C5a14f9d64ab04e3ee30908d950cc7ddd%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637629661641271485%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000sdata=BjxwawMPwjJctwBEulm%2FAhDCUD6qWob%2F%2F3SZ27wK8X4%3Dreserved=0. I can update when I find out more and will also check in other territories before sending any out on Maproulette until we find out whats happening on this check. Best, Oisin -Original Message- From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2021 4:00 AM To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Talk-au Digest, Vol 169, Issue 32 Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to talk-au@openstreetmap.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.openstreetmap.org%2Flistinfo%2Ftalk-audata=04%7C01%7Cv-oiher%40microsoft.com%7C5a14f9d64ab04e3ee30908d950cc7ddd%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637629661641271485%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000sdata=RL97XeZ10ZXU19mvOhCyAO9%2FBePR0hviS7dAx3w53jk%3Dreserved=0 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org You can reach the person managing the list at talk-au-ow...@openstreetmap.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..." Today's Topics:
Re: [talk-au] Audible fences
On 1/8/21 7:25 pm, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au wrote: Aug 1, 2021, 09:48 by fors...@ozonline.com.au: What physically is this 'screeching fence'? Is it in the middle of the road like a cattle grid, or along the edge of the road? A single pole with the device on it? Or is it 2 poles on opposite sides of the road with devices mounted one them? Or is it a series of poles along both sides of the road with devices on them? Hi Warin There is more than one way to implement virtual fencing The one near me https://www.wildlifesafetysolutions.com.au/ Is a series of poles along both sides of the road with devices on them, though it could be one side Tony Then barrier=fence is really unsuitable - as it is not a barrier at all for human and is unlike other barrier=fence despite using similar name I'd not place the qualifier on a fence being a human barrier, what if the fence is 0.6 meters high? I would advise against using barrier=fence for them Even barrier=audible_fence would be better. Maybe something completely different barrier=audible or barrier=sensoric (???) (AFAIK also light is sometimes used) I'd not use fence even as an extension. barrier=audio ? And for one using light alone barrier=light? For one using both light and audio barrier-audio_and_light ? ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
