Re: [talk-au] Fwd: Re: data.sa.gov.au

2013-07-25 Thread Ben Kelley
Well done. Thanks for following it up.

  - Ben Kelley
On 25 Jul 2013 16:19, Alex Sims a...@softgrow.com wrote:

  I've now obtained permission and recorded it at
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#South_Australian_Government_data

 This is really very helpful as it allows:
 * at least a first pass for filling in nonames roads
 * geo-referencing  Bing photos against property boundaries at least near
 the CBD
 * accurate Local Government and Suburb boundaries as opposed to ABS
 approximations
 * more bike lanes, playgrounds, fire stations, ambulance stations etc. to
 be included

 I followed a similar path to what was used for data.gov.au, and would
 comment that the day to write seeking permission/clarification is today as
 it takes a while, but the outcome is worth it.

 Anyway I'm excited and quite pleased, just wish I had more time for
 mapping.

 Alex
  Original Message   Subject: Re: [talk-au] data.sa.gov.au  
 Date:
 Sat, 25 May 2013 21:35:55 +0930  From: Alex Sims 
 a...@softgrow.coma...@softgrow.com  To:
 talk-au@openstreetmap.org

 I'm just writing an email now to seek a similar agreement for
 sa.data.gov.au as for data.gov.au

 Alex

 On 25/05/2013 5:23 PM, Paul Norman wrote:

  The only issue with CC BY is that some data owners believe that
 attribution “reasonable to the medium” is more than the ODbL guarantees
 which allows “notices in a location … where users would be likely to look
 for it” such as a wiki page linked from /copyright or in the case of
 produced works, a “notice … reasonably calculated to make [anyone] aware
 that Content was obtained from the Database” (The “Database” in that quote
 would be what was provided under CC BY).

 ** **

 Some cities releasing data as CC BY insisted that only mention on any page
 where the map was viewed was reasonable, which is clearly unreasonable when
 there can be dozens of sources on one page, or even hundreds.

 ** **

 *From:* Ian Sergeant [mailto:inas66+...@gmail.com inas66+...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Saturday, May 25, 2013 12:09 AM
 *To:* Daniel O'Connor
 *Cc:* talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 *Subject:* Re: [talk-au] data.sa.gov.au

 ** **

 Hi Daniel,

 The first step should be to find out if they are willing to have their
 data relicenced under our licence?

 CC-BY data is nice, and means that the data owner is likely only seeking
 attribution (which we do provide) but my understanding is that it is still
 insufficient for us to use without further permission from the data owner.
 Pointers to our attribution page have worked in the past in gaining such
 permission.

 Ian.

 On 24 May 2013 18:58, Daniel O'Connor daniel.ocon...@gmail.com wrote:***
 *

 The SA govt has joined many of the other state/local governments in
 publishing open data. 

 ** **

 The current implementation is powered by CKAN, and though I haven't seen
 it yet, appears to be leveraging openstreetmap / cloudmade in some fashion.
 

 ** **

 Anyway, the majority of the data sets are CC-A licensed, and in either CSV
 or Shapefile format:

 ** **

 Some initial things that might be worth importing/using as a
 reference/looking into:

 http://www.data.sa.gov.au/dataset/major-and-minor-roads

 http://www.data.sa.gov.au/dataset/library-locations

 http://www.data.sa.gov.au/dataset/parks-and-reserves

 http://www.data.sa.gov.au/dataset/sa-playgrounds

 http://www.data.sa.gov.au/dataset/stormwater-nodes

 http://www.data.sa.gov.au/dataset/surface-water-catchments

 http://www.data.sa.gov.au/dataset/suburb-boundaries

 and of course:

 http://www.data.sa.gov.au/dataset/centrelink-office-locations

 ** **

 Not sure how much overlap with data.gov.au data sets (assume some).

 ** **

 Anyone want to have a look around and

 1) Call out the things you think are missing

 2) Call out the things you'd want to have imported or manually transcribed
 into open street map




 ___
 Talk-au mailing list
 Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Fwd: Re: data.sa.gov.au

2013-07-25 Thread Brett Russell
Top job.  Looks like the walls are tumbling down and access been gradually 
granted to government data.

Cheers Brett

Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:40:02 +1000
From: ben.kel...@gmail.com
To: a...@softgrow.com
CC: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Fwd: Re: data.sa.gov.au

Well done. Thanks for following it up.
  - Ben Kelley
On 25 Jul 2013 16:19, Alex Sims a...@softgrow.com wrote:


  


  
  
I've now obtained permission and recorded it at 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#South_Australian_Government_data



This is really very helpful as it allows:

* at least a first pass for filling in nonames roads 

* geo-referencing  Bing photos against property boundaries at least
near the CBD

* accurate Local Government and Suburb boundaries as opposed to ABS
approximations

* more bike lanes, playgrounds, fire stations, ambulance stations
etc. to be included



I followed a similar path to what was used for data.gov.au, and
would comment that the day to write seeking permission/clarification
is today as it takes a while, but the outcome is worth it.



Anyway I'm excited and quite pleased, just wish I had more time for
mapping.



Alex

 Original Message
  
  

  
Subject:

Re: [talk-au] data.sa.gov.au
  
  
Date: 
Sat, 25 May 2013 21:35:55 +0930
  
  
From: 
Alex Sims a...@softgrow.com
  
  
To: 
talk-au@openstreetmap.org
  

  
  

  

  
  I'm just writing an email now to seek
a similar agreement for sa.data.gov.au as for data.gov.au



Alex



On 25/05/2013 5:23 PM, Paul Norman wrote:

  
  




  The

  only issue with CC BY is that some data owners believe
  that attribution “reasonable to the medium” is more than
  the ODbL guarantees which allows “notices in a location …
  where users would be likely to look for it” such as a wiki
  page linked from /copyright or in the case of produced
  works, a “notice … reasonably calculated to make [anyone]
  aware that Content was obtained from the Database” (The
  “Database” in that quote would be what was provided under
  CC BY).
   
  Some

  cities releasing data as CC BY insisted that only mention
  on any page where the map was viewed was reasonable, which
  is clearly unreasonable when there can be dozens of
  sources on one page, or even hundreds.
   
  

  
From:
Ian Sergeant [mailto:inas66+...@gmail.com]


Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 12:09 AM

To: Daniel O'Connor

Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org

Subject: Re: [talk-au] data.sa.gov.au
  

 
Hi Daniel,

  

  The first step should be to find out if they are willing
  to have their data relicenced under our licence? 

  

  CC-BY data is nice, and means that the data owner is
  likely only seeking attribution (which we do provide) but
  my understanding is that it is still insufficient for us
  to use without further permission from the data owner. 
  Pointers to our attribution page have worked in the past
  in gaining such permission.

  

  Ian.

  On 24 May 2013 18:58, Daniel O'Connor
daniel.ocon...@gmail.com

wrote:
  
The SA govt has joined many of the
  other state/local governments in publishing open
  data. 
  
  
 
  
  
The current implementation is
  powered by CKAN, and though I haven't seen it yet,
  appears to be leveraging openstreetmap / cloudmade in
  some fashion.
  
  
 
  
  
Anyway, the majority of the data
  sets are CC-A licensed, and in either CSV or Shapefile
  format:
  
  
 
  
  
Some initial things that might be
  worth importing/using as a reference/looking into:
  
  

  http://www.data.sa.gov.au/dataset/major-and-minor-roads