Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nice visualization of how old buildings are
Hi Glenn, I thought it could be an easy way to give a demo to Belgians of why open data and mapping is awesome. If it's too much work I would indeed not bother with it, yet Waag society said they can do it fairly quickly, as long as they have the data. Kind regards, Pieter On 2014-01-09 08:44, Glenn Plas wrote: On 08-01-14 19:19, Pieter Colpaert wrote: Hi OSM-BE! I've been in touch with the people who made this: http://citysdk.waag.org/buildings/#52.6395,6.2106,14 They said we can do the same thing, as long as we have the shape file of the buildings (probably kadaster) as open data and the year the houses were built. The latter is available in the dataset of CRAB, as we know when the number in the street was registered. Is this feasible for BE? We can load our data in their system :) Kind regards, Pieter Asside from being pretty cool, what added value does this represent for OSM, directly on indirectly? There is still tons of the most basic work to do (maxspeeds, housenumbers, blanks to fill in). It would still be a massive undertaking as CRAB buildings do not map 1 on 1 on OSM data. It is cool, I aggree... but what is the real reason to want this I wonder? Glenn ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be -- +32 486 74 71 22 Open Knowledge Foundation Belgium http://okfn.be Open Transport Working Group OKFN http://transport.okfn.org ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nice visualization of how old buildings are
On 09-01-14 10:05, Pieter Colpaert wrote: Hi Glenn, I thought it could be an easy way to give a demo to Belgians of why open data and mapping is awesome. If it's too much work I would indeed not bother with it, yet Waag society said they can do it fairly quickly, as long as they have the data. I like it, don't misunderstand, but I've been checking some buildings in Amsterdam, I used to live there. And almost all red buildings are constructed in 1005 according to that information. Now, I'm pretty sure that the number of houses in amsterdam reaching the age of 1009 years is quite low... I really do like the map, in fact I'm stealing some idea's from it as we speak, but it should be accurate, like this we don't know the right ones from the wrong. I'm going to check in depth later after earning my bread money for today ;-) Greetings, Glenn Kind regards, Pieter On 2014-01-09 08:44, Glenn Plas wrote: On 08-01-14 19:19, Pieter Colpaert wrote: Hi OSM-BE! I've been in touch with the people who made this: http://citysdk.waag.org/buildings/#52.6395,6.2106,14 They said we can do the same thing, as long as we have the shape file of the buildings (probably kadaster) as open data and the year the houses were built. The latter is available in the dataset of CRAB, as we know when the number in the street was registered. Is this feasible for BE? We can load our data in their system :) Kind regards, Pieter Asside from being pretty cool, what added value does this represent for OSM, directly on indirectly? There is still tons of the most basic work to do (maxspeeds, housenumbers, blanks to fill in). It would still be a massive undertaking as CRAB buildings do not map 1 on 1 on OSM data. It is cool, I aggree... but what is the real reason to want this I wonder? Glenn ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be -- The program isn't debugged until the last user is dead. ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
[OSM-talk-be] Nice visualization of how old buildings are
Hi OSM-BE! I've been in touch with the people who made this: http://citysdk.waag.org/buildings/#52.6395,6.2106,14 They said we can do the same thing, as long as we have the shape file of the buildings (probably kadaster) as open data and the year the houses were built. The latter is available in the dataset of CRAB, as we know when the number in the street was registered. Is this feasible for BE? We can load our data in their system :) Kind regards, Pieter ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nice visualization of how old buildings are
On 08-01-14 19:19, Pieter Colpaert wrote: Hi OSM-BE! I've been in touch with the people who made this: http://citysdk.waag.org/buildings/#52.6395,6.2106,14 They said we can do the same thing, as long as we have the shape file of the buildings (probably kadaster) as open data and the year the houses were built. The latter is available in the dataset of CRAB, as we know when the number in the street was registered. Is this feasible for BE? We can load our data in their system :) Kind regards, Pieter Asside from being pretty cool, what added value does this represent for OSM, directly on indirectly? There is still tons of the most basic work to do (maxspeeds, housenumbers, blanks to fill in). It would still be a massive undertaking as CRAB buildings do not map 1 on 1 on OSM data. It is cool, I aggree... but what is the real reason to want this I wonder? Glenn ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
