Re: [Talk-de] Broken Turn Relations in Schweiz, Österreich, Bayern und Baden-Württemberg
Am 04.05.2013 12:45, schrieb Rainer Dorsch: Hallo Franz, vielen Dank. Sind die Bounding Boxen identisch mit den Karten, hier Baden-Württemberg, Bayern, Schweiz und Österreich. z.B. eine Turn restriction, die in Bayern das from element und in Baden-Württemberg das To element hat? Wenn ja, dann ist das schwierig zu vermeiden, da ich maptool aus navit dann nur die Daten innerhalb der Bounding Box füttere. Ich könnte höchstens versuchen größere Datensätz zu rechnen. Wenn nein, kannst Du ein Beispiel posten? Danke und Gruß Rainer Hallo Rainer, die Bounding-Boxen, die Du verwendest kenne ich nicht - nur aus der Logik, dass der Umriss einer Bounding-Box so liegen kann, dass von einer Turn-Restriction z.B. nur der to-Weg zum Teil innerhalb des Ausschnitts liegt. Im Beispiel [1] sieht man auch die Grenze auf dem Inn. Diese Abbiegebeschränkung war auch immer in den Auswertungen von Gary68 vor einigen Jahren enthalten, aber dort hatte ich keinen Fehler gefunden - nun weiß ich, dass diese Relation in der Fehlerliste landet, weil der to-Weg zum Teil innerhalb der Bounding-Box liegt - deshalb die Relation mit der Abbiegebeschränkung geladen wird, aber der via-Knoten und der From-Weg im ausgeschnittenen Bereich nicht gefunden werden können, gibt es den Fehlertext ... member not found. Da der from-Weg im oben genannten Beispiel komplett in Österreich liegt, nehme ich an, dass sich die Bounding-Boxen der Regionen vermutlich etwas überlappen (in diesem Beispiel schätze ich: 1 km) und somit ein via-Knoten mit angeschlossenen from- und to-Wegen immer in einem der Ausschnitte liegt. Es würde also reichen, die Zeilen mit dem Fehlertext ... member not found wegzulassen, da sie systembedingt entstanden sind und keine Fehler an Abbiegebeschränkungen sind. [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/178773 Erklärende Grüße, Franz ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] Broken Turn Relations in Schweiz, Österreich, Bayern und Baden-Württemberg
Hallo Rainer, die Liste ist jetzt abgearbeitet. Die jeweils letzten Zeilen jeder Gruppe, die auf ... member not found enden, sind Abbiegebeschränkungen, bei denen nur ein Weg zum Teil innerhalb der Bounding-Box zum Ausschneiden der Gruppe aus einer größeren Karte liegt, während der via-Knoten und der zweite Weg außerhalb liegen und somit in dem Extrakt fehlen, obwohl diese Abbiegebeschränkungen in Ordnung sind, wurden sie hier aufgeführt. Reparierende Grüße, Franz ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] Broken Turn Relations in Schweiz, Österreich, Bayern und Baden-Württemberg
Hallo, ich habe mit dem maptool von Navit ein paar Karten prozessiert und ein paar kaputte Turn Relations gefunden: http://bokomoko.de/~rd/navit/broken_turn_relations_130501.log Erfreulicherweise sind es viel weniger als vor 2 Monaten. Viele Grüße Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Broken Turn Relations
Hallo Rainer, gestern habe ich noch einen Grund gefunden, warum auch korrekte Abbiegebeschränkungen in dieser Fehlerliste auftauchen: Die Bounding-Box bzw. die Umrisslinie, die zum Ausschneiden eines Bundeslandes verwendet wird ist etwas größer als dieses Bundesland und sollte es auch sein. Dadurch kommt es vor (unabhängig von der Breite des Streifens, der in benachbarte (Bundes-)Länder ragt), dass beim Ausschneiden z.B. der from-Weg noch zum Teil innerhalb liegt, der to-Weg aber komplett außerhalb (oder umgekehrt - einer fehlt jedenfalls) und dieser deshalb in dem ausgeschnitteten Bereich fehlt und das Programm diese Relation als fehlerhaft in die Log-Datei schreibt. Aufgefallen ist mir das, weil ich Kontakt mit einem User hatte, der mir schrieb, dass eine schon länger korrekte Abbiegebeschränkung aus der BaWü-Liste in Hessen liegt. Durch Einbau des folgenden Tests können diese abgeschnittenen Relationen erkannt werden und sie landen nicht in dieser Liste: Wenn ein Weg in der Relation vorhanden ist, aber in dem Ausschnitt nicht, könnte er außerhalb liegen - dann steht als Fehlertext ... not found und nicht ... missing. Man kann auch prüfen, ob der via-Knoten außerhalb der Bounding-Box liegt. Möglicherweise reicht dieses ... not found schon als Kriterium, diese Relation nicht in die Liste zu schreiben - sie würde bei einem anderen Bundesland-Extrakt vollständig geladen werden.. Da erklärt auch, warum ich schon vor einigen Jahren bei den monatlichen Listen von fehlerhaften Relationen von Gary68 die Relation [1] immer wieder als fehlerhaft eingetragen fand, obwol sie ok ist - die liegt kurz hinter der Grenze zu Österreich (wohl auf der Linie der Bounding-Box). Diese korrekten Relationen habe ich auf der Wiki-Seite [2] mit Bounding Box markiert. Diese Hinweise können auch in ähnlichen Fällen für andere Leser interessant sein, die mittels Bounding-Box etwas ausschneiden und an den Rändern Probleme haben. Gestern sind mir auch einige wenige Abbiegebeschränkungen aufgefallen, die alle drei Elemente hatten, aber deren From- und To-Wege entgegen der Einbahn-Richtung verliefen - das sind auch Fehler. Das könnte auch noch geprüft werden (weiteres Ticket). [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/178773 [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:restriction/Fehlerhafte_Turn_Restrictions Grüße, Franz ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] Broken Turn Relations
Hallo, hier ist ein Update von Broken Turn Relations, wie sie von Navits maptool berichtet werden: http://bokomoko.de/~rd/broken_turn_relations_121125.log Es ist leider noch ein bug in maptool, der ein paar falsche Warnungen generiert: http://trac.navit-project.org/ticket/1076 Gruß Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Broken Turn Relations
Hallo Rainer, Am Sonntag, 25. November 2012, 18:25:58 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: hier ist ein Update von Broken Turn Relations, wie sie von Navits maptool berichtet werden: http://bokomoko.de/~rd/broken_turn_relations_121125.log OSM Warning: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2545313 turn restriction: to member not found Was ist die Bedeutung der Fehlermeldung hier genau? Die Relation sieht einwandfrei aus (und das schon seit dem 1. November). Eckhart ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Broken Turn Relations
Hallo, Deine Liste habe ich in unserem Wiki ergänzt [1], damit jeder seine korrigierten Restrictions dort abhaken kann. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:restriction/Fehlerhafte_Abbiegebeschr%C3%A4nkungen Grüße, Franz ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Broken Turn Relations
Danke, Franz. Rainer Am Sunday 25 November 2012 schrieb Franz vonGordon: Hallo, Deine Liste habe ich in unserem Wiki ergänzt [1], damit jeder seine korrigierten Restrictions dort abhaken kann. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:restriction/Fehlerhafte_Abbi egebeschr%C3%A4nkungen Grüße, Franz ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Broken Turn Relations
Hallo Eckhart, guter Punkt, da muss ich selbst nachfragen. Gruß Rainer Am Sunday 25 November 2012 schrieb Eckhart Wörner: Hallo Rainer, Am Sonntag, 25. November 2012, 18:25:58 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: hier ist ein Update von Broken Turn Relations, wie sie von Navits maptool berichtet werden: http://bokomoko.de/~rd/broken_turn_relations_121125.log OSM Warning: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2545313 turn restriction: to member not found Was ist die Bedeutung der Fehlermeldung hier genau? Die Relation sieht einwandfrei aus (und das schon seit dem 1. November). Eckhart ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: rdor...@web.de jabber: rdor...@jabber.org GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Broken turn relations
Am 22.06.2012 12:52, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: 2012/6/21 Peter Wendorffwendo...@uni-paderborn.de: For me nodes, ways and areas sound reasonable for slipways. A slipway is similar to a street = in osm a way. It may be a very small feature and somebody may only know the estimated location = in osm a node It may be of very different width up to a wide area like = in osm a polygon/closed way. +1. Probably we should suggest to add area=yes on polygons. That shouldn't be necessary, as it's not ambiguous: A closed highway=slipway IMHO always should be interpreted as an area, so it's not necessary to add area=yes; It's no benefit to add a second tag data users have to take into account instead of requiring to take the closed-ness of the way into account. The latter variant is less error prone as mappers don't have to deal with that extra tag, and it's not less work for data consumers. regards Peter ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Broken turn relations
Hello, now I am ready with repairing most of the items of all four lists of both countries. Franz ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Broken turn relations
2012/6/21 Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de: For me nodes, ways and areas sound reasonable for slipways. A slipway is similar to a street = in osm a way. It may be a very small feature and somebody may only know the estimated location = in osm a node It may be of very different width up to a wide area like = in osm a polygon/closed way. +1. Probably we should suggest to add area=yes on polygons. cheers, Martin ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Broken turn relations
Hallo, started with the turn restrictions of Switzerland I am now ready with the rest of the broken polygons of the same country (except slipways, tourist=attraction and sport=ski). I am now starting (and tomorrow continuing) with the turn restrictions of austria. I like such lists in this length about once a month as gary68 did until about a year ago (who has left OSM). We also have a wiki page [1], where we got some lists of broken turn restrictions of germany and austria, from which I repaired about half of the items. It was planned to uptate the list every month, but this never happened. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:restriction/Fehlerhafte_Turn_Restrictions Franz ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Broken turn relations
Am 21.06.2012 07:14, schrieb Rainer Dorsch: Am Thursday 21 June 2012 schrieb Michael Bemmerl: Rainer Dorsch schrieb: I did some navit map conversions and maptool gives a number of warnings, not sure if they are useful. Thanks, I've fixed the obvious ones (like missing via's, double 'to' roles, etc.). Some additional ones for Switzerland:30147027 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/30147027 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/30147029 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined fixed. OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/35574899 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined According to the wiki slipways are correct as a non-closed way, so this is an error of the Navit converter. OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37056687 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37104618 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/38696067 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/44178424 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined again slipways: no error. OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/45892924 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined Here an address-interpolation seems to be mixed up with a single adress; cannot fix it without local knowledge. OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/50759439 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/50760438 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined Skiing tracks, no problem again (except for the navit exporter). OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/76565202 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined no error: it's a bridge (tagged as line) with a leisure-tag because it's an attraction. Again a navit error, I would say. OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/104414041 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined fixed. OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/117933873 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined path over a river without bridge tagged (that's a problem itself), with tourism=attraction, which may be correct (then it's a problem with navit again) or not, cannot fix it. So far... more probably later. regards Peter OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/122849577 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/129112162 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/140679701 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/151285613 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/159742530 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/163072084 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/106309 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/106310 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/106311 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/106901 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/107216 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/107217 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/147022 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/147025 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/409265 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/409266 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/450871 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/576191 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1103711 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1308609 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1320122 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1704053 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1704054 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1704131 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1761853 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM
Re: [Talk-de] Broken turn relations
2012/6/21 Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de: According to the wiki slipways are correct as a non-closed way, so this is an error of the Navit converter. this is not completely clear. The wiki page for the feature used to define it for nodes only, then someone changed this to linear ways only: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aleisure%3Dslipwayaction=historysubmitdiff=595262oldid=510283 someone else changed it back months later: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aleisure%3Dslipwayaction=historysubmitdiff=711100oldid=689606 and then ways were added again: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aleisure%3Dslipwayaction=historysubmitdiff=727279oldid=711100 The map-features still list only nodes as valid elements for slipways: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leisure?uselang=en-US Taginfo lists 7857 nodes and 1607 ways. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/leisure=slipway Shall we add ways for this feature in the map features compilation? cheers, Martin ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Broken turn relations
For me nodes, ways and areas sound reasonable for slipways. A slipway is similar to a street = in osm a way. It may be a very small feature and somebody may only know the estimated location = in osm a node It may be of very different width up to a wide area like = in osm a polygon/closed way. Small slipways often are some kind of street extending to the water, so a way should fit perfectly. regards Peter Am 21.06.2012 10:38, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: 2012/6/21 Peter Wendorffwendo...@uni-paderborn.de: According to the wiki slipways are correct as a non-closed way, so this is an error of the Navit converter. this is not completely clear. The wiki page for the feature used to define it for nodes only, then someone changed this to linear ways only: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aleisure%3Dslipwayaction=historysubmitdiff=595262oldid=510283 someone else changed it back months later: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aleisure%3Dslipwayaction=historysubmitdiff=711100oldid=689606 and then ways were added again: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aleisure%3Dslipwayaction=historysubmitdiff=727279oldid=711100 The map-features still list only nodes as valid elements for slipways: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leisure?uselang=en-US Taginfo lists 7857 nodes and 1607 ways. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/leisure=slipway Shall we add ways for this feature in the map features compilation? cheers, Martin ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
[Talk-de] Broken turn relations
Hello, I did some navit map conversions and maptool gives a number of warnings, not sure if they are useful. OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/146483 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/288251 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/309657 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/386107 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/932415 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/932477 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/932483 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/933070 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/933073 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1103711 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1131894 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1312788 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1344608 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1362027 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1362936 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1363289 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1398251 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1421392 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1454808 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1662117 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1662136 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1662138 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1737428 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1823545 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1905684 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1905691 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1964135 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1965333 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2088552 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2156390 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2170703 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2170704 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2170737 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2225346 turn restriction: via member missing -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Broken turn relations
Rainer Dorsch schrieb: I did some navit map conversions and maptool gives a number of warnings, not sure if they are useful. Thanks, I've fixed the obvious ones (like missing via's, double 'to' roles, etc.). Regards, Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Broken turn relations
Am Thursday 21 June 2012 schrieb Michael Bemmerl: Rainer Dorsch schrieb: I did some navit map conversions and maptool gives a number of warnings, not sure if they are useful. Thanks, I've fixed the obvious ones (like missing via's, double 'to' roles, etc.). Some additional ones for Switzerland: OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/30147027 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/30147029 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/35574899 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37056687 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37104618 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/38696067 Broken polygon, area is 0 OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/44178424 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/45892924 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/50759439 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/50760438 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/76565202 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/104414041 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/117933873 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/122849577 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/129112162 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/140679701 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/151285613 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/159742530 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/163072084 Broken polygon, less than 3 points defined OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/106309 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/106310 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/106311 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/106901 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/107216 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/107217 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/147022 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/147025 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/409265 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/409266 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/450871 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/576191 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1103711 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1308609 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1320122 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1704053 turn restriction: from member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1704054 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1704131 turn restriction: multiple via member OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1761853 turn restriction: multiple to members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1857487 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1866218 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1963230 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2147921 turn restriction: to member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2153575 turn restriction: via member missing OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2167096 turn restriction: multiple from members OSM Warning:http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2169505 turn restriction: from member missing OSM
