[Talk-gb-westmidlands] Longbridge

2013-07-29 Thread Arthur Geeson

Hi,

I had a ride around Longbridge in the rain this afternoon with the GPS 
running so I would like to work on the new Park View housing estate on 
the corner between Lickey Road and Lowhill Lane.  See you at Northfield 
at around 8pm.


Arthur

___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands


Re: [Talk-GB] Finding Unmapped public rights of way

2013-07-29 Thread Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
On 27 July 2013 13:11, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote:
 I'm trying to make use of the row files on rowmaps for derbyshire and
 staffordshire and and merging these with and osm map file to then produce
 maps that can highlight which paths are and aren't mapped.  I can put the
 derbyshire file into JOSM and download parts of the area and merge them to
 create an osm file that I can then save locally and import into Maperative.

I assume that these digitised PRoW Maps from local councils are
released under the OS OpenData License. That being the case, please
note that Ordnance Survey have recently stated that their OS OpenData
licence is not forward compatible with the ODC-By and ODbL [1]. Hence
these datasets cannot currently be used as direct sources for
contributing to OSM.

Of course this doesn't prevent individuals generating data comparisons
and then using them to focus mapping efforts that make use of other
sources. And hopefully OS will be persuaded to amend their license, so
we can start making full use of these PRoW GIS datasets.

Robert.

[1] http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/os-open-data.html

-- 
Robert Whittaker

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


[Talk-GB] UK Postcodes

2013-07-29 Thread Nick Allen

Hi,

I was wondering if there were any updates / progress on UK Postcodes. I 
have seen that the Land Registry Price Paid data is partially available 
on the 'Postcode finder website', but don't seem to be able to contact 
'Milliams' to see if any updates will be released (I'm probably looking 
in the wrong places!).


The http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors page has an entry;


 /Land Registry - Price paid data /

//

/OpenStreetMap contributors use the //Land Registry Price Paid Data 
http://www.landregistry.gov.uk/public/information/public-data/price-paid-data//as 
a source for address data. This data is published under the OGL and the 
following attribution is required. /


/This data covers the transactions received at land Registry in the 
period 01/02/2012 to the last day of the current month. © Crown 
copyright 2012. /


/If you have found an error with the data please contact //Her Majesty's 
Land Registry (HMLR) 
http://www.landregistry.gov.uk/professional/price-paid-error/


which looks promising.

I've been busily working away on the BR8 *** postcodes  am hoping the 
'http://milliams.dev.openstreetmap.org/postcodefinder/landregistry/' 
site will have regular updates (monthly?) which would be very helpful.


Regards

Nick (Tallguy)


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Finding Unmapped public rights of way

2013-07-29 Thread Steven Horner
Personally I just produced the Durham map to show how much work is still to
be done.

Then use this as a basis to go out and survey.

A lot of the PRoW are incorrect anyway when actually on the ground. Even
when they have been amended officially, either the council doesn't update
their data or ordnance survey have not used the data sent.

This is one of the biggest advantages to OSM, it is updated. If the OSM and
walking community could come together to fill in the missing data. For
instance I know the Ramblers in Durham walked every path in the county a
couple of years ago. I wonder if they have the GPX tracks, I will make
enquiries.

 On 29 Jul 2013 12:53, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) 
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 27 July 2013 13:11, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote:
  I'm trying to make use of the row files on rowmaps for derbyshire and
  staffordshire and and merging these with and osm map file to then produce
  maps that can highlight which paths are and aren't mapped.  I can put the
  derbyshire file into JOSM and download parts of the area and merge them
 to
  create an osm file that I can then save locally and import into
 Maperative.

 I assume that these digitised PRoW Maps from local councils are
 released under the OS OpenData License. That being the case, please
 note that Ordnance Survey have recently stated that their OS OpenData
 licence is not forward compatible with the ODC-By and ODbL [1]. Hence
 these datasets cannot currently be used as direct sources for
 contributing to OSM.

 Of course this doesn't prevent individuals generating data comparisons
 and then using them to focus mapping efforts that make use of other
 sources. And hopefully OS will be persuaded to amend their license, so
 we can start making full use of these PRoW GIS datasets.

 Robert.

 [1] http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/os-open-data.html

 --
 Robert Whittaker

 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] UK Postcodes

2013-07-29 Thread Matt Williams
On 29 July 2013 13:15, Nick Allen nick.allen...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I was wondering if there were any updates / progress on UK Postcodes. I have
 seen that the Land Registry Price Paid data is partially available on the
 'Postcode finder website', but don't seem to be able to contact 'Milliams'
 to see if any updates will be released (I'm probably looking in the wrong
 places!).

 The http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors page has an entry;

 Land Registry - Price paid data

 OpenStreetMap contributors use the Land Registry Price Paid Data as a source
 for address data. This data is published under the OGL and the following
 attribution is required.

 This data covers the transactions received at land Registry in the period
 01/02/2012 to the last day of the current month. © Crown copyright 2012.

 If you have found an error with the data please contact Her Majesty's Land
 Registry (HMLR)

 which looks promising.

 I've been busily working away on the BR8 *** postcodes  am hoping the
 'http://milliams.dev.openstreetmap.org/postcodefinder/landregistry/' site
 will have regular updates (monthly?) which would be very helpful.

Sorry, this is my fault for being unresponsive. I'm very busy at the
moment finishing my PhD thesis so I've found it difficult to find time
to keep this up to date.

I'm currently running an update to renew the data from the OSM
database and then I'll start adding in the last few months of Land
Registry data. They seem to be releasing it fairly promptly these days
so I should be able to it more regularly. However, the files are still
not named in any regular format so updating them has to be done
manually.

I also see that they've now also released a bunch of semi-historic
data from 2009-2011 (before we only have 2012 onwards) so I'll work on
incorporating that soon which should greatly increase the coverage of
the tool.

I am also giving a talk at State of the Map about the tool so I'll be
around there to talk to people about extra features etc. that they
might want from it.

Cheers,
Matt

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] UK Postcodes

2013-07-29 Thread Nick Allen
Matt,

Thanks for the very good news.

Regards

Nick (Tallguy)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


[Talk-GB] OS OpenData Licence update (WAS: Finding Unmapped public rights of way)

2013-07-29 Thread Rob Nickerson
Robert W said:
That being the case, please note that Ordnance Survey have recently stated
that their OS OpenData licence is not forward compatible with the ODC-By
and ODbL.

Yes, they did, and that quote has gotten them in a lot of trouble. The Open
Government License (of which Ordnance Survey's OpenData licence is based)
was intended to allow fair and open re-use of public sector data. As you
are well aware Ordnance Survey added some text above the standard OGL that
played havoc with this. I have been working to raise this at the Open Data
User Group- a government funded group that reports into the governments
Data Strategy Board - and OS's quote was the trigger for action:


== Updated Open Government Licence ==
Version 2 of the OGL now makes it perfectly clear that OGL is compatible
with our licence:

This means that when the Information is adapted and licensed under either
of those licences, you automatically satisfy the conditions of the OGL when
you comply with the other licence. The OGLv2.0 is Open Definition
compliant.

http://nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/2/


== ODUG's report on OS licensing ==
A quote from the report makes it pretty clear what they want:

Ordnance Survey receives £20m of annual funding from government to release
OS OpenData under the Open Government Licence. Government intends this
funding to foster business use of OS data to fuel economic growth. However,
Ordnance Survey licensing restrictions limit the downstream use of OS
OpenData which contradicts the government’s intention.

http://data.gov.uk/sites/default/files/20130717%20OS%20Open%20Data%20Licensing.pdf

And on PROW data:
http://data.gov.uk/sites/default/files/20130717%20Public%20Rights%20of%20Way.pdf


== ODUG's latest Minutes ==
A couple more quotes:

Ordnance Survey applies additional licensing restrictions to the OS Open
Data licence. This restricts the competitive landscape in which they
operate with partners and prohibits open re-use of the data. ODUG members
believe that OS should have an obligation to release their open data, which
is publicly funded, to be consistent with the terms of the Open Government
Licence. Following publication of the OS Benefits case it was agreed that
the ODUG should make a case to BIS and the Cabinet Office Transparency
Board for OS to accept the recommendations in the case.

OS are also claiming that any data regarded as an interpretation of raw
data is exempt from FOI requests. The effect would be to block access to
public information data sets which have a geographical component of OS
derived data. ODUG does not accept this position, and agreed to work on
test cases to demonstrate the impact of this.

http://data.gov.uk/sites/default/files/minutes%2019th%20july%20final%20version.pdf



Bottom line = Feel free to use OS OpenData for OSM mapping :-D

Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb