Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Schools with fhrs:id
On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 20:33 +0100, Lester Caine wrote: > On 20/10/17 18:51, Gregrs wrote: > > I think it makes sense for both fhrs:id and addr:postcode to be on > > the same entity, whether that's the boundary or a building. In some > > cases schools might have more than one building with an fhrs:id, > > but it's possible that these would have a different postcode e.g. > > the different houses at Rugby School (http://www.openstreetmap.org/ > > way/363617437). > > The majority of UK schools will only have the one catering facility > and > it's unlikely that this will not be the same place as school premises > and involve a single postcode although with the unstable ownership of > schools these days, we may well see private food outlets inside > 'academies'? Although central catering facilities feeding several > schools also messes up the picture. > It probably not that unusual for schools to have separate catering facilities for the sixth form. The school I attended in the 1970s did just that and a small amount of research suggests my local school now has the same. Phil (trigpoint) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Schools with fhrs:id
On 20/10/17 18:51, Gregrs wrote: > I think it makes sense for both fhrs:id and addr:postcode to be on the same > entity, whether that's the boundary or a building. In some cases schools > might have more than one building with an fhrs:id, but it's possible that > these would have a different postcode e.g. the different houses at Rugby > School (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363617437). The majority of UK schools will only have the one catering facility and it's unlikely that this will not be the same place as school premises and involve a single postcode although with the unstable ownership of schools these days, we may well see private food outlets inside 'academies'? Although central catering facilities feeding several schools also messes up the picture. Bigger collage complexes may well have additional catering outlets across multiple campuses which need separate objects for each campus, building and potentially each identifiable outlet. It should not be a problem identifying each outlet and since the FHRS data is open licence http://ratings.food.gov.uk/enhanced-search/en-GB/Rugby%20School/Rugby/Relevance/0/%5E/%5E/1/1/20 provides every inspection point and the raw data can be download from http://ratings.food.gov.uk/OpenDataFiles/FHRS319en-GB.xml and a couple of the 8 entries for Rugby School are at the same postcode. So one needs separate objects to hold these fhrs:id records rather than the campus boundary. Bottom line ... there should be separate objects where that is necessary and it would be nice if the larger operations such as Rugby School helped with detailed campus maps as many of the collage and university sites have been doing? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Schools with fhrs:id
On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 18:43 +0100, Dave F wrote: > I've been putting it on the boundary as it covers the whole school > which > can include domestic science (or whatever it's called now) & the > school > fĂȘte barbecue as well as the canteen. > Interestingly I have since been looking at FHRS stuff locally and within the area for the local comprehensive school there are three objects listed with different postcodes and FHRS IDs. I am guessing first to fifth form, 6th form and the the boarding section, its quite an unusual state comprehensive with a very long history. Phil (trigpoint) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] weeklyOSM #378 2017-10-10-2017-10-16
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 378, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/9548/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages where?: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3 ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Schools with fhrs:id
Hi Dave, On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 06:43:25PM +0100, Dave F wrote: In my LA they have pre/post school 'clubs' listed separately. I've been adding them as nodes within the school as amenity=club. I'm open to suggestion if there's something better for them. You could add all the FHRS IDs to the school boundary separated by semicolons but I'm afraid this isn't yet supported by the comparison tool: https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/11. One advantage of what you're currently doing is that the clubs get mapped as an amenity too. Thanks, Greg -- Twitter: @gregrs_uk http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org PGP key ID: 64907C8A Fingerprint: EBD1 077F CCDD 841E A505 3FAA D2E8 592E 6490 7C8A signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Schools with fhrs:id
Hi Colin, On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 03:17:49PM +0100, Colin Spiller wrote: Most of the school information is tagged to the school boundary. However, I would expect the fhrs:id tag to be on the relevant building within the boundary, but the comparison tool - thank you gregrs - expects both the postcode and the fhrs:id on the same object. So is that the standard - both on the boundary, and is it documented in the wiki anywhere? I thought I had better check before I did too many updates! Thanks for raising this, Colin. This GitHub issue is partly relevant: https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/42#issuecomment-272649433. As of January, it was more common to add the addr:postcode tag to the school boundary rather than a relevant building. I think it makes sense for both fhrs:id and addr:postcode to be on the same entity, whether that's the boundary or a building. In some cases schools might have more than one building with an fhrs:id, but it's possible that these would have a different postcode e.g. the different houses at Rugby School (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363617437). The comparison tool should cope with the fhrs:id tag being on either the boundary or building, as long as both fhrs:id and addr:postcode tags are on the same entity. It will suggest matches based on the centroid of the school boundary but will pick up existing matches on either. Thanks, Greg -- Twitter: @gregrs_uk http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org PGP key ID: 64907C8A Fingerprint: EBD1 077F CCDD 841E A505 3FAA D2E8 592E 6490 7C8A signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Schools with fhrs:id
I've been putting it on the boundary as it covers the whole school which can include domestic science (or whatever it's called now) & the school fĂȘte barbecue as well as the canteen. In my LA they have pre/post school 'clubs' listed separately. I've been adding them as nodes within the school as amenity=club. I'm open to suggestion if there's something better for them. DaveF. On 20/10/2017 15:17, Colin Spiller wrote: I've recently been catching up with some fhrs:id tags. I've found several (most?) of the local schools have entries in the Food Standards agency lists. I must have missed something, because I'm now confused. Most of the school information is tagged to the school boundary. However, I would expect the fhrs:id tag to be on the relevant building within the boundary, but the comparison tool - thank you gregrs - expects both the postcode and the fhrs:id on the same object. So is that the standard - both on the boundary, and is it documented in the wiki anywhere? I thought I had better check before I did too many updates! Thanks in advance Colin --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging Schools with fhrs:id
On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 15:17 +0100, Colin Spiller wrote: > I've recently been catching up with some fhrs:id tags. I've found > several (most?) of the local schools have entries in the Food > Standards > agency lists. I must have missed something, because I'm now confused. > > Most of the school information is tagged to the school boundary. > However, I would expect the fhrs:id tag to be on the relevant > building > within the boundary, but the comparison tool - thank you gregrs - > expects both the postcode and the fhrs:id on the same object. So is > that > the standard - both on the boundary, and is it documented in the > wiki > anywhere? I thought I had better check before I did too many updates! > In most cases I would just stick with putting the fhrs:id on the boundary as we do not have the necessary information to identify individual buildings. There may be a few where there is more than one fhrs:id for different facilities but that will be a very small number and is not something we can survey. Phil (trigpoint) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] Tagging Schools with fhrs:id
I've recently been catching up with some fhrs:id tags. I've found several (most?) of the local schools have entries in the Food Standards agency lists. I must have missed something, because I'm now confused. Most of the school information is tagged to the school boundary. However, I would expect the fhrs:id tag to be on the relevant building within the boundary, but the comparison tool - thank you gregrs - expects both the postcode and the fhrs:id on the same object. So is that the standard - both on the boundary, and is it documented in the wiki anywhere? I thought I had better check before I did too many updates! Thanks in advance Colin -- Colin Spiller co...@thespillers.org.uk ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Activity Updates
Hi Rob No need for thewalkthrough everyhting was very intuitive and easy to find. The only downer is the inability to select multiple objects and perform one tagging Problems for bus routing software (Mentz Diva) were caused by: incorrect complex junction configuration not permitting the desired route through; turn restriction rather than an access restriction; ambiguous access restriction; bus stop with incorrect route_ref regards Brian On 19 October 2017 at 22:47, Rob Nickersonwrote: > Great news. > > Can I enquire about two things: First did you use the iD walkthrough and > if yes, how was it? Did it provide a full introduction or did you need to > help with extra support too? > > And second, what sort of oddities did you get on the TfWM bus route > plotting software? And how were they typically solved? > > Thanks, > > *Rob* > > On 19 October 2017 at 16:43, Brian Prangle wrote: > >> Hi everyone >> >> 1. I'm back training Probation Pay Back Attendees with Anawim. I've >> currently assigned our first new trainee the SE corner of Nuneaton to add >> buildings and improve road alignments. Latest version of id is much >> improved! >> 2. I now have a direct link into TfWM's maintainer of NaPTAN bus stops >> and we're working on a process for regular updates. I'll keep you uppdated >> as to progress >> 3. TfWM now plot their bus routes using a piece of software that uses OSM >> data.It sometimes produces weird results that need some unentangling f the >> OSM data, so we had good fun this week solving some of them >> >> Regards >> >> Brian >> >> ___ >> Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list >> Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands >> >> > > ___ > Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list > Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands > > ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project: Addresses and Postcodes
On 20/10/17 06:05, Marc Gemis wrote: > The full information that Nominatim knows for "WR12 7EP, United > Kingdom" is shown on : > http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=180306705 > It does list a collection of streets. What you see on osm.org is just > a small set, which does not include the list of streets. The number of > streets in a postal code really depends on the country, it might be a > small number in the UK, but is large in e.g. Germany. Actually http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=65620674 is of more interest in this discussion. Should I have added a postcode to the highway object? Also should each house have a name tag in addition to the house number? The information on houses is complete in my book, but do we need to create additional tags so that Nominatim lists the equivalent of the PAF file addresses? If I add the names then the rendering becomes messy which is why I only added the house number. And I must update the postbox collection times ... that change some time back :( ... but if those details were pulled from a secondary source ... -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb