Re: [Talk-GB] New Data in PRoW Comparison Tool
Could we follow the signage for the prow_ref format where the authority puts it on signs? -- Andrew From: Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) Sent: 05 July 2018 09:17:10 To: talk-gb Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] New Data in PRoW Comparison Tool On 3 July 2018 at 15:10, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > I've just added another county -- East Sussex -- to my PRoW Comparison > Tool: http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/progress/east-sussex/ Devon now added as well: http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/progress/devon/ There were a number of different prow_ref formats in use in Devon. The most popular was of the form "Chivelstone Bridleway 6" (with the parish name and the RoW type spelt out). This also what the county council uses on their online interactive map. So for now I've set my tool to use this style for Devon. Other formats with significant use in Devon include "Chivelstone BR 6" (with the RoW type abbreviated), "Chivelstone 6" (without the type at all), "211BR11" (presumably the 211 is a parish code), and "DN|Bampton|2" (which is the artificial format used by rowmaps.com). I don't think we can have a single standard for prow_ref formats across the whole county, but I do think we should adopt a single format within each authority area. Given the usage (in OSM and by the Council), I'd suggest going with the "Chivelstone Bridleway 6" style for Devon. I'm going to invite some of the mappers who've been working on Devon PRoWs to comment here with their thoughts. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] Footpaths QP
Hi everyone Can someone with more skills than me come up with a measurement tool that updates daily or weekly along the lines of total length for the UK in Km for footways,bridleways, BOATS etc and total length for tags designation=public_footpath etc and finally total length for prow_ref tags? Regards Brian ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] New Data in PRoW Comparison Tool
On 3 July 2018 at 15:10, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: > I've just added another county -- East Sussex -- to my PRoW Comparison > Tool: http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/progress/east-sussex/ Devon now added as well: http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/progress/devon/ There were a number of different prow_ref formats in use in Devon. The most popular was of the form "Chivelstone Bridleway 6" (with the parish name and the RoW type spelt out). This also what the county council uses on their online interactive map. So for now I've set my tool to use this style for Devon. Other formats with significant use in Devon include "Chivelstone BR 6" (with the RoW type abbreviated), "Chivelstone 6" (without the type at all), "211BR11" (presumably the 211 is a parish code), and "DN|Bampton|2" (which is the artificial format used by rowmaps.com). I don't think we can have a single standard for prow_ref formats across the whole county, but I do think we should adopt a single format within each authority area. Given the usage (in OSM and by the Council), I'd suggest going with the "Chivelstone Bridleway 6" style for Devon. I'm going to invite some of the mappers who've been working on Devon PRoWs to comment here with their thoughts. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
