Re: [Talk-GB] UK Chapter Directors' Powers
Rob, While I understand the thrust you're trying to make towards a more "members have the power" system, setting the bar as low as five members and having a simple "online poll" in lieu of a meeting of the members would have two problems: 1. Entryism would be almost comically easy. It would be a small matter for myself and four friends to paralyse the chapter by constantly calling votes on anything and everything - for example, calling an online poll on the existence of the chapter. This would prevent them doing anything and everything which isn't a contractual or statutory obligation. It doesn't matter if I don't win, I can just call another one immediately afterwards, and the directors would be unable to stop me. If they wanted to try, I could just call a motion on whether or not they should stop me, which would prevent them from doing so for seven days. 2. I'm concerned that any poll would be profoundly undemocratic unless carried out with the same rigour as a proper vote, in which case it would be a vote. If a member is on holiday for a week, or if they live overseas, they'll simply miss out - even the quick ones ("Blueys") can take six days to arrive. The 14 days notice period is really important, as is the formality of a vote which is binding on the directors. If the directors are going to be bound by something, that something needs to be properly planned and executed to the highest standards. Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 25 April 2016 at 13:12, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) < robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 23 April 2016 at 16:10, Rob Nickerson <rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > To breed a culture of Member-led organisation (with Directors as figure > > heads) I suggest: > > > > Directors have all the power > > Members can direct the Directors to take/refrain from taking action via a > > ORDINARY Resolution > > Voting on Ordinary resolutions can be opened immediately (not 14 days), > be > > online, and after a period of X days the vote is passed if 50% of those > who > > voted (not 75% of ALL members in the case of the Written Special > Resolution) > > accept the resolution. > > > > This sends a strong message that this is a member led organisation. > > I agree that having a faster/easier mechanism for the members to reign > in the directors would be a good thing, and would force the directors > to consult the members and only proceed with their consent. However, > I'm not convinced that it would be a good idea (from a company law > point of view) to re-define "Ordinary Resolutions" to achieve this. As > an alternative solution, perhaps we should introduce the concept of a > more informal vote, say an "Online Pole", which members can use to > direct the directors. I would envisage something like this: > > * Any five members may request that the directors run an Online Pole > on any matter concerning the way the Company is being run by the > directors. > * On receipt of such a request, a pole will be opened as soon as > practicable, and notice sent to all members. > * Once such a request has been received, the directors must refrain > from taking any action contrary to the pole motion until after the > pole has closed, unless this would result in them being unable to meet > a statutory or prior contractual obligation. > * An online pole closes at midnight UK time at the end of the 7th day > following the day that notice is sent to all members. > * The directors are bound by any motion in an online pole passed by a > simple majority of those voting, unless this would result in them > being unable to meet a statutory or prior contractual obligation, > until such time as the motion is set aside or superseded by a > subsequent pole or resolution. > > Alternatively, we could redefine the section on written resolutions > along the lines of the above. > > (With the current draft of the AoA, as far as I can see, there's > actually no way for the members to demand a written resolution in > order to exercise their S9 power to direct the directors. So currently > they'd have to call a General Meeting and propose the resolution
Re: [Talk-GB] OSM with Wikidata: now covers UK and Ireland
> > "To fix in wikidata/wikipedia is there one place to edit it so that it > propagates to wikidata and all the different language wikipedias? " The best way is to update wikidata, and in good time it will propagate across to the various Wikipedias once they're linked with Wikidata (not all are fully linked yet, but they will be in time) Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 10 March 2016 at 20:35, Ian Caldwell <ian1caldwell+...@googlemail.com> wrote: > This analysis shows some errors in both wikidata/wikipedia and OSM, we > should try and fix some of them. > > On error in particular is difference in location, in Worcestershire they > are 36 cases were the distance is 1 km or more. It quite a lot of cases > this is an error in wikidata/wikipedia. To fix in wikidata/wikipedia is > there one place to edit it so that it propagates to wikidata and all the > different language wikipedias? > > > Ian > > On 10 March 2016 at 17:57, Edward Betts <edw...@4angle.com> wrote: > >> I've extended my search for matches between OSM and Wikidata again. It now >> covers all of the UK and Ireland. >> >> I used map data from >> http://download.geofabrik.de/europe/british-isles.html >> >> The results are grouped by region or county as well as by category. >> >> http://edwardbetts.com/osm-wikidata/gb-ie/ >> >> I'm going to figure out how to upload these matches to OSM. I've >> registered an >> account with the username Wikidata to use for the uploads. >> >> There will be one changeset per county + category for any category with >> 10 or >> more matches in that county. Categories with less than 10 matches in the >> county will be combined into a single changeset. >> >> OSM objects with an existing wikidata tag won't be changed. >> -- >> Edward. >> >> ___ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> > > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Case study: Big Pathwatch
Hurrah! Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 29 February 2016 at 15:39, Rob Nickerson <rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > All, > > Last year the Ramblers launched an app to encourage people to report > problems with rights of way. > > The concept was easy: You pick a 1km square, survey the paths it in, and > report back. > > I've just received the following email which gives an indication of public > interest in this sort of thing: > > The Big Pathwatch has now closed! *Thank you so much* for joining us and > being part of the first ever nationwide footpath survey. Together, we have > surveyed an incredible *75,836 square km *across England and Wales, > reporting more than *70,000 footpath problems *and *58,000 positive > features*. > > *Rob* > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Redraft of objectives for OSMUK
WMUK uses the following definition: https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/Open_knowledge "The definition of Open Content given in the Articles of Association says: "Content" means textual or numerical information, still or moving images, sound or music or other data disseminated on printed, electronic and other appropriate media and services. Content is subject to editorial policies and safeguards designed to ensure its overall accuracy and quality. Content is "Open" when it is available for no charge and without discrimination to the general public, with legal rights to view, copy, share, adapt, improve and otherwise use and reuse that content and when technical measures are in place to support such usage." Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 17 February 2016 at 22:05, Rob Nickerson <rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > >Hi everyone > > > >3rd draft following this week's concall > > > > > >@Rob - this really needs to go in the wiki but I'm not really proficient at > >wiki editing > > > >Regards > >Brian > > Hi Brian, > > Sorry for the delay. This is done now [1]. By the way the wiki is now a > lot easier to edit as it has a new "WYSIWYG" type editor :-) > > My comments on the draft are: > >- To avoid confusion with OS OpenData we should change "OpenData" to >either "open data" or, my preference, the more general "information". >- As we cover UK and Islands then we shouldn't use just UK in the >objectives. Suggest replacing "the UK" with "the Region" and defining this >somewhere in our articles of association. > > We should push to adopt this at the next meeting. Do we have a date for > that yet? > > Cheers, > *Rob* > [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_Group > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] UK war office maps of Africa digitised
yep, seems to be working now! I'll get cracking. Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 12 February 2016 at 11:25, Tim Waters <chippy2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Are you still having issues? That map appears to be okay now, last > rectified 3 days ago and was able to rectify it just now. I've a > screenshot here: > http://imgur.com/bOjMnWq http://warper.wmflabs.org/maps/261#Preview_tab > > Find me on IRC as chippy sometime if you are still encountering problems. > > regards, > > Tim > > On 9 February 2016 at 18:44, Richard Symonds > <richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote: > > Tim, > > > > A lot of these maps won't rectify, even though I've completed all the > > control points. The one I've just come up with is > > http://warper.wmflabs.org/maps/261 - can someone try and preview it, or > tell > > me what I'm doing wrong? > > > > Richard Symonds > > Wikimedia UK > > 0207 065 0992 > > > > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and > > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered > > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A > 4LT. > > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia > > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who > > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). > > > > Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control > over > > Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents. > > > > > > On 9 February 2016 at 17:30, Jez Nicholson <jez.nichol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I tinkered with the "Kilimanjaro to Tsavo Stn. U.R.. WOOS-8-3-1" map a > >> fair bit. Started by using recognisable locations (features on lakes, > etc.) > >> but eventually settled on tagging the grid lines and using online > conversion > >> tools to give me the WGS-84. The ones with hills in look great in Google > >> Earth, e.g. http://warper.wmflabs.org/maps/629.kml Difficult to get > the map > >> spot on. > >> > >> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 at 16:28 Tim Waters <chippy2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi folks, > >>> > >>> so after a fix was applied to the Wikimaps Warper the collection of > >>> 581 maps from Wikimedia Commons was re-imported and added to a mosaic > >>> (layer) > >>> > >>> > >>> > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:War%20Office%20Archive%20%E2%80%93%20British%20East%20Africa > >>> > >>> The mosaic: > >>> http://warper.wmflabs.org/layers/4 > >>> > >>> The Tiles link is > http://warper.wmflabs.org/layers/tile/4/{z}/{x}/{y}.png > >>> and the WMS details can be found at > >>> http://warper.wmflabs.org/layers/4#Export_tab > >>> > >>> and of course individual maps have their own WMS and Tiles endpoints > too > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>> Tim > >>> > >>> p.s. Note that loading up a map for the first might take a once only > >>> period of a couple of minutes as the map gets requested from commons > >>> and is loaded up in the warper ... you should see a progress bar in > >>> that case! > >>> > >>> p.p.s. There's an issue with the warper not getting the correct > >>> thumbnail for some of the maps, but it shouldn't affect how it works > >>> in the warper. > >>> > >>> On 2 February 2016 at 13:58, Jez Nicholson <jez.nichol...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > The export tab http://warper.wmflabs.org/maps/629#Export_tab > includes a > >>> > WMS > >>> > link "for JOSM OpenStreetMap Editor" > >>> > > >>> > I haven't tried it yet as my company have firewalled the office with > an > >>> > https whitelist. > >>> > > >>> > On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 at 17:34
Re: [Talk-GB] UK war office maps of Africa digitised
Tim, A lot of these maps won't rectify, even though I've completed all the control points. The one I've just come up with is http://warper.wmflabs.org/maps/261 - can someone try and preview it, or tell me what I'm doing wrong? Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 9 February 2016 at 17:30, Jez Nicholson <jez.nichol...@gmail.com> wrote: > I tinkered with the "Kilimanjaro to Tsavo Stn. U.R.. WOOS-8-3-1" map a > fair bit. Started by using recognisable locations (features on lakes, etc.) > but eventually settled on tagging the grid lines and using online > conversion tools to give me the WGS-84. The ones with hills in look great > in Google Earth, e.g. http://warper.wmflabs.org/maps/629.kml Difficult to > get the map spot on. > > On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 at 16:28 Tim Waters <chippy2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> so after a fix was applied to the Wikimaps Warper the collection of >> 581 maps from Wikimedia Commons was re-imported and added to a mosaic >> (layer) >> >> >> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:War%20Office%20Archive%20%E2%80%93%20British%20East%20Africa >> >> The mosaic: >> http://warper.wmflabs.org/layers/4 >> >> The Tiles link is http://warper.wmflabs.org/layers/tile/4/{z}/{x}/{y}.png >> and the WMS details can be found at >> http://warper.wmflabs.org/layers/4#Export_tab >> >> and of course individual maps have their own WMS and Tiles endpoints too >> >> Cheers, >> >> Tim >> >> p.s. Note that loading up a map for the first might take a once only >> period of a couple of minutes as the map gets requested from commons >> and is loaded up in the warper ... you should see a progress bar in >> that case! >> >> p.p.s. There's an issue with the warper not getting the correct >> thumbnail for some of the maps, but it shouldn't affect how it works >> in the warper. >> >> On 2 February 2016 at 13:58, Jez Nicholson <jez.nichol...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > The export tab http://warper.wmflabs.org/maps/629#Export_tab includes >> a WMS >> > link "for JOSM OpenStreetMap Editor" >> > >> > I haven't tried it yet as my company have firewalled the office with an >> > https whitelist. >> > >> > On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 at 17:34 Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 1 February 2016 at 13:02, Tim Waters <chippy2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Great stuff. I think a few hundred maps (if not all) from this >> >> > collection >> >> > are already in the wikimaps warper. >> >> > However there was an issue with making a mosaic (stitched layer) for >> the >> >> > category, so this will be fixed soon. >> >> >> >> Once that's done, how can people see the layer in JOSM? >> >> >> >> > I think the British Library also has control points for the maps >> which >> >> > could >> >> > be added to the warper when ready (I'd have to double check on this >> >> > point >> >> > though). >> >> >> >> My contact tells me they (BL & Indigo Trust) want to see the maps >> >> reused; if there's a speciific request, I can forward it to them. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Andy Mabbett >> >> @pigsonthewing >> >> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk >> > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] UK war office maps of Africa digitised
Jez, These are all OGL licenced and on Wikimedia Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:War_Office_Archive_%E2%80%93_British_East_Africa They were uploaded by Nora McGregor, Digital Curator, British Library ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ndalyrose) so are fine to use, I believe. Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 30 January 2016 at 13:36, Jez Nicholson <jez.nichol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Your knowledge of copyright is probably better than mine, but unless the > British Library renounce their ownership of the scans or UK law changes > (which is possible) I would say none. :( > On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 at 23:50, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> > wrote: > >> What's the potential to get these crown-copyright-expired maps as an OSM >> layer, for tracing? >> >> http://www.bl.uk/collection-guides/war-office-archive >> >> -- >> Andy Mabbett >> @pigsonthewing >> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk >> ___ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] Fwd: [Wikimediauk-l] UK IPO updates advice on copyright in digitised public domain works
Forwarding from another list. This may have an impact when using digitized copies of public domain maps. -- Forwarded message -- From: "Michael Maggs"Date: 15 Dec 2015 13:20 Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] UK IPO updates advice on copyright in digitised public domain works To: "Wikimedia Mailing List" , " wikimediau...@lists.wikimedia.org" , < common...@lists.wikimedia.org> Cc: There are at long last indications that UK copyright law is moving in the direction of the WMF and Commons policy [1] that "faithful copies of public domain works are themselves in the public domain" - in other words that faithful photographic reproductions of old, out of copyright artworks such as paintings do not create an enforceable new copyright for the photographer. The UK Intellectual Property Office has recently updated its copyright advice notice [2] to include the following: Are digitised copies of older images protected by copyright? ''Simply creating a copy of an image won’t result in a new copyright in the new item. However, there is a degree of uncertainty regarding whether copyright can exist in digitised copies of older images for which copyright has expired. Some people argue that a new copyright may arise in such copies if specialist skills have been used to optimise detail, and/or the original image has been touched up to remove blemishes, stains or creases.'' ''However, according to the Court of Justice of the European Union which has effect in UK law, copyright can only subsist in subject matter that is original in the sense that it is the author’s own ‘intellectual creation’. Given this criteria, it seems unlikely that what is merely a retouched, digitised image of an older work can be considered as ‘original’. This is because there will generally be minimal scope for a creator to exercise free and creative choices if their aim is simply to make a faithful reproduction of an existing work.'' This official advice from a UK Government agency is useful as it recommends a strikingly different approach from the one that has been taken over many years by the UK courts, namely that a new copyright can very easily be created merely by the 'skill and labour' involved in taking any sort of photograph (the copyright practitioner's text, Copinger & Skone James, says that "in terms of what is original for the purpose of determining whether copyright subsists in a photograph, the requirement of originality is low and may be satisfied by little more than the opportunistic pointing of the camera and the pressing of the shutter button.") Although the IPO advice is not binding on the UK courts, it will be of useful persuasive value. It's interesting that the official view being taken is that the European Court of Justice has effectively replaced the very low bar of "Was sufficient skill and labour applied?" with the higher one of "Is it the author’s own intellectual creation?''. The 2009 CJEU decision in Infopaq [3] is gaining traction. Communia have published a blog post [4] that is worth reading. Michael Maggs Chair, Wikimedia UK [1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag [2] https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/481194/c-notice-201401.pdf [3] http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:62008CJ0005 [4] http://www.communia-association.org/2015/12/04/1761/ ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] 'Romantic London' - reusing Horwood's 1790's map
This is excellent - but didn't the NLS do something similar not long ago? Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 27 October 2015 at 14:35, Dan S <danstowell+...@gmail.com> wrote: > Very nice! The map sync really makes it interesting to explore. My > house is off the side of the map, unfortunately, but where my > university now stands was "Bencroft's Alms Houses" :) > > Thanks > Dan > > > 2015-10-27 13:30 GMT+00:00 Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk>: > > I witnessed a fascinating presentation, this morning, on a project > > which has digitised the first map of London at building level, and > > overlays it with data from other sources: > > > >http://www.romanticlondon.org/ > > > > The data sets are freely available, but the British Library claims > > copyright over the map images - I'm sure some of you will have your > > own views about this. > > > > I shall notify the project's creator, Dr Matthew Sangster, about this > > post, and invite him to join this list. He would be a good speaker for > > a future OSM conference. > > > > -- > > Andy Mabbett > > @pigsonthewing > > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk > > > > ___ > > Talk-GB mailing list > > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Village, Hamlet and populations ...
I see your problem... could you tell me how exactly you define the hierarchy at the moment? Is it ad-hoc, with various rules in different areas etc? Perhaps it would be better to, instead of having a hierarchy based on definitions, instead having a hierarchy based on pure population size. If this gives odd results, then perhaps you could have a "booster value" if the town is used as a post town or a seat of local government (for example). I worry that trying to define terms like "village" or "town" is doomed to failure, because very few will agree on what it means, no matter how much we try ;-) Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 14 September 2015 at 15:08, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: > On 14/09/15 14:23, Richard Symonds wrote: > > Is there any reason that a place can't be both? > > eg. > > "defines self as=town" > > "defines self as=village" > > "defined by X as village" > > > > Or the like? > > The obvious answer is that unless one adds some sort of filter it will > get counted twice? Once as a town and once as a village. There should > only be one place entry in OSM or so the > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place?uselang=en-GB says. I'm not > sure but adding a second place tag should not work I think. Place is > part of the hierarchy of a location on OSM, so having it appear as both > a town and village would be confusing on searches. > > -- > Lester Caine - G8HFL > - > Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact > L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk > EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ > Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk > Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Village, Hamlet and populations ...
Is there any reason that a place can't be both? eg. "defines self as=town" "defines self as=village" "defined by X as village" Or the like? Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 14 September 2015 at 14:20, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: > On 14/09/15 13:02, SK53 wrote: > > On the other hand finding a way to access population figures to places > > for data consumers is useful. Directly adding population values may work > > in Britain where population change is relatively slow, so slowly > > outdated data is still useful, but is risky in other parts of the world. > > At the very lease also add a link to wikipedia/wikidata as well, which > > ultimately should obviate having to maintain population values > > That is precisely where I started ;) > Or rather adding the wikipedia link ... > > The problem is that even coverage in wikipedia is far from complete so > one finds erratic quality of information. Additionally wikidata is still > at an early stage and does not have the bulk of the information already > in wikipedia, so someone has to go through and change all the > information blocks around or add missing ones where needed :( > > -- > Lester Caine - G8HFL > - > Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact > L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk > EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ > Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk > Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Village, Hamlet and populations ...
Well, the beauty is that you could use just those definitions instead: "defined by PC as village" "defined by census as town" "defined by Local Government Act as parish" etc etc. Wikidata is very good at keeping track of these, and then the reader can simply select whose definition they want to use! Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 14 September 2015 at 14:52, Colin Smale <colin.sm...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > > > No reason whatsoever but how do you determine what a place calls > itself? What the Parish Council puts on the "village" sign -> according to > the PC. What the population maps to according to some algorithm -> > according to the author of the algorithm. > > On 2015-09-14 15:23, Richard Symonds wrote: > > Is there any reason that a place can't be both? > eg. > "defines self as=town" > "defines self as=village" > "defined by X as village" > > Or the like? > > Richard Symonds > Wikimedia UK > 0207 065 0992 > > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). > > *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control > over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* > > On 14 September 2015 at 14:20, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: > >> On 14/09/15 13:02, SK53 wrote: >> > On the other hand finding a way to access population figures to places >> > for data consumers is useful. Directly adding population values may work >> > in Britain where population change is relatively slow, so slowly >> > outdated data is still useful, but is risky in other parts of the world. >> > At the very lease also add a link to wikipedia/wikidata as well, which >> > ultimately should obviate having to maintain population values >> >> That is precisely where I started ;) >> Or rather adding the wikipedia link ... >> >> The problem is that even coverage in wikipedia is far from complete so >> one finds erratic quality of information. Additionally wikidata is still >> at an early stage and does not have the bulk of the information already >> in wikipedia, so someone has to go through and change all the >> information blocks around or add missing ones where needed :( >> >> -- >> Lester Caine - G8HFL >> - >> Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact >> L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk >> EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ >> Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk >> Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk >> >> ___ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Openstreetmap Foundation Charity Number
I have already offered privately ;-) Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 18 August 2015 at 16:00, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: On 18 August 2015 at 14:16, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote: If anyone has experience setting up and running a UK charity, the OSMF board would be interested in having a chat. WikimediaUK have experience, I can put you in touch with some folk who were trustees at the time, off-list, if you would like. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Cities: Skylines - Openstreetmap data
I haven't, but I may well do tonight! Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 23 May 2015 at 08:55, Bob Kerr openstreetmapcraigmil...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Has anyone played with this, It seems to be getting good press https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=416064574 Cheers Bob ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] Fwd: [cultural-partners] High Quality map released
FYI: A high-resolution map of Newport from 1845 has been uploaded by the National Library of Wales. It's a bit out of date (170 years or so) but may be of use to some mappers. Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK -- Forwarded message -- From: Jason J. Evans jason.ev...@llgc.org.uk Date: 12 May 2015 at 13:38 Subject: [cultural-partners] High Quality map released To: cultural-partn...@wikimedia.ch Hi every one, Just to let you all know, the National Library of Wales have taken another big step towards open access by uploaded a very high res copy of a historic tithe map. The map shows the city of Newport in Wales - which was surveyed around the time of the Chartist uprisings (Newport uprising) We have uploaded the map as a whole at a reasonable resolution here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Newport_Tithe_Map.png and also in High Quality sections here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/St_Woolos,_Newport_Tithe_Map I also plan add geo-referencing data (which already exists) to the map when I have time. Please let me know what you think! -- Jason Evans Wicipediwr Preswyl / Wikipedian in Residence Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru / National Library of Wales jason.ev...@llgc.org.uk Ffon/Tel: +44 (0)1970 632405 ___ Cultural-Partners mailing list cultural-partn...@wikimedia.ch https://intern.wikimedia.ch/lists/listinfo/cultural-partners Please treat emails sent to this list as confidential.Ask senders for permission before forwarding emails off-list. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Railway edits in the UK that could perhaps benefit from a bit of checking.
Interestingly, the source given is the German phrase for surveyed in the field... Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 12 November 2014 10:52, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I looked at the first user in the list and the first page of changesets loaded with one close to me which is a railway platform apparently in the middle of a housing estate. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24439915 As it’s a U_Bahn entry I'm assuming its meant to be a platform on an underground line that’s just totally in the wrong geographical location. However the name of station 1 might suggest its someone practicing too. Reverting and will look for others in the west mids area. Cheers Andy -Original Message- From: SomeoneElse [mailto:li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk] Sent: 12 November 2014 10:23 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Railway edits in the UK that could perhaps benefit from a bit of checking. More info on this - it seems to be a bunch of people working for this company: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/%C3%96V_Firma_Mentz_Datenverarbeitung_GmbH I've had no reply from the mapper that I tried to contact (although they have fixed at least one of the problems that they created) so I've tried again via direct message, comment on the firm's OSM wiki page and an OSM message to the company's main OSM account. What concerns me is that they're still editing (with various accounts). It's relatively easy to trace straight lines from Bing, but it needs experience and interpretation (and a local survey!) to see how everything on the ground relates to everything else. Based on their error rate so far I'd definitely still suggest that local mappers check their edits. Cheers, Andy On 08/11/2014 22:51, SomeoneElse wrote: An anonymous note adder (http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/267719) and someone on IRC noticed some problematical railway edits near Sutton-in-Ashfield: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311380489#map=15/53.1247/-1.2346laye rs=N It looks like an attempt to dual the Robin Hood line went a bit wrong and ended up slicing through an industrial estate and some areas of housing (though I'm sure it was cock-up rather than conspiracy as Sir Bernard Ingham would have said). Looking at some other edits in the same changeset, there are some other, less obvious, issues too, which I've added to the changeset discussion: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26590071 The most obvious problem seems to be tracing the railway in but not joining properly to other features (such as crossings). Some information (e.g. cutting=yes) has also been lost. Another local changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26587435 has some similar issues. There have been a number of other edits, some with rather a lot of deletions in them, including: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26613977 All of these changesets could probably also benefit from a review from local mappers to identify potential issues. Cheers, Andy ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] A431 toll road
More info at http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/services/streets-and-highway-maintenance/roadworks/major-transport-schemes/a431-kelston-road-council - The Council has no details to confirm the toll road design meets safety standards and no evidence that insurances are in place for any member of the public who use the private toll road. Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 4 August 2014 12:21, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: On 4 August 2014 12:11, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote: Have the Bath Bristol folks picked up on this one? http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Toll-road-field-gets-drivers-A431-closure/story -22064579-detail/story.html tag: legality=none insurance_validity=dubious -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] A431 toll road
Temporary roads need planning permission - and although I'm not sure about this, I imagine it would need public liability insurance etc too. Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 4 August 2014 12:29, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote: why should it be illegal? On 2014-08-04 13:21, Andy Mabbett wrote: On 4 August 2014 12:11, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote: Have the Bath Bristol folks picked up on this one? http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Toll-road-field-gets-drivers-A431-closure/story -22064579-detail/story.html tag: legality=none insurance_validity=dubious ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] New mapper has imported all Nottingham street lights
I know this may be a silly question, but why revert if it adds to the map? It runs the risk of alienating a new contributor... I'm not au fait with community rules and would appreciate someone teaching me why we do this :-) Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 29 July 2014 21:51, SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote: Don't need to say much more, other than it's an undiscussed import and if we'd thought it would be useful could have done it anytime in the past 18 months. Changeset is : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24412110 Will plan to revert in 1 days time if no further action by the mapper. Jerry ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Newbie hello
Marvellous Stuart! Glad to have you aboard. Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 3 July 2014 16:02, Stuart Reynolds stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk wrote: Hi all, Just joined the mailing list. I’ve been editing small bits of data here and there for a while, although I’m still a newbie at this. I work for traveline south east anglia and, along with colleagues in some other traveline regions, we have just adopted OSM as our base mapping layer. I will undoubtedly be more active now as we look to add a number of bus lanes / bus gates where these aren’t already in the data, and I will no doubt be trespassing on your time asking a number of dumb newbie-type questions (in the newbie mailing list, naturally!) Cheers Stuart --- Stuart Reynolds traveline south east anglia ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Life Ring - British English
An office poll of four people here gives the answer life belt, with a fifth person saying life ring. Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 16 June 2014 10:38, Barnett, Phillip phillip.barn...@itn.co.uk wrote: And http://www.scarborough.gov.uk/Default.aspx?page=7573 for a modern usage example. Lifebelts | Scarborough Borough Council A local authority is required to provide and maintain lifebelts next to rivers and waterways in the area. Read more... http://www.scarborough.gov.uk/Default.aspx?page=7573 PHILLIP BARNETT SERVER MANAGER 200 GRAY'S INN ROAD LONDON WC1X 8XZ UNITED KINGDOM T +44 207 430 4474 E phillip.barn...@itn.co.uk WWW.ITN.CO.UK P Please consider the environment. Do you really need to print this email? -- *From:* Barnett, Phillip *Sent:* 16 June 2014 10:37 *To:* Richard Mann; Andreas Goss *Cc:* talk-gb OSM List (E-mail) *Subject:* RE: [Talk-GB] Life Ring - British English Historically it's always been lifebelt in England. See eg http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/e-brown-survivors-photo.html http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/e-brown-survivors-photo.html Crewman E. Brown and two other Titanic survivors Survivors from the Titanic disaster arrive in Southampton. The centre figure in the photograph is Mr E. Brown who was unable to swim but kept afloat f... Read more... http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/e-brown-survivors-photo.html -- *From:* Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com *Sent:* 16 June 2014 10:30 *To:* Andreas Goss *Cc:* talk-gb OSM List (E-mail) *Subject:* Re: [Talk-GB] Life Ring - British English en-gb is probably lifebuoy I've never heard it called a life ring - that's too vague a name. Most people would probably refer to it by starting to describe it - one of those red ring things that you can use to help someone who is drowning. On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote: I'm trying to clean up the emergency tags in the Wiki and found emergency=life_ring as well as some less used other tag combinations with amenity and buoy. Is life ring how it is commonly referred to in British English. Just wanted to make sure it's not literal translation from German and isn't used in the UK at all. Wikipedia lists a lot of different names. I guess lifebuoy is more American? And is it written life ring or lifering? Both correct? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dlife_ring https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifebuoy __ openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88 wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88 ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb Please Note: Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Independent Television News Limited unless specifically stated. This email and any files attached are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify postmas...@itn.co.uk Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of our clients and business, we may monitor and read messages sent to and from our systems. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Fwd: In mainland Britain, you are never more than 34 miles from a pub.
I think it depends on your definition of 'sea' - and probably the definition of lighthouse too! There's a lighthouse in Tower Hamlets - as well as some in the Scottish lochs. Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 12 June 2014 11:12, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote: One thing that surprised me was 61 miles from a lighthouse as (and I don't know this) I'd have guessed that some of the central parts of England would be getting on for 100 miles from the sea. But my geography of that part of the world isn't great so I'm probably wrong... Nick -Craig Wallace craig...@fastmail.fm wrote: - To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org From: Craig Wallace craig...@fastmail.fm Date: 11/06/2014 09:53PM Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Fwd: In mainland Britain, you are never more than 34 miles from a pub. On 2014-06-08 16:28, Dan S wrote: Hi all, In mainland Britain, you are never more than 34 miles from a pub. http://mcld.co.uk/feet-from-a-rat/pub.html And luckily, in mainland Britain, you are never more than 30 miles from a public toilet. http://mcld.co.uk/feet-from-a-rat/public-toilet.html Several of the calculations seem to be including the Mull as part of mainland Britain, ie churches and golf courses. It is definitely an island. As for public toilets, must be a few missing from the map. I think there's toilets in Thurso and Bettyhill, though it has been a few years since I visited these. Craig ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Duff data on facebook
Hi Lester, Facebook updates the places it has using crowdsourced information from here: https://www.facebook.com/places/editor?ref=br_tf. I'm afraid that's all I know... Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 9 June 2014 08:48, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote: Having lived in Broadway - Worcestershire for many years now, it is getting somewhat irritating that Facebook will not allow me to tag this fact. They for some reason seem to think that Broadway is in Gloucestershire. Various attempts have been made to get things corrected, and pages have been created for 'Worcestershire', but even these are now being redirected to the 'correct' master according to Facebook. Can anybody throw ANY light on to why they insistthat their data is the correct view? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL - Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] OSM session at Wikimania 2014
Fantastic Andy. I'll be attending :-) Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 2 June 2014 12:18, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: On 2 June 2014 12:11, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: I've had a session pitch accepted, to speak about OSM at Wikimania 2014 (the annual Wikipedia/ Wikimedia conference; their equivalent of State of the map), held this year in London, in August. P.S. The talk will be on Saturday afternoon, 9 August, at 2.30pm -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Wikimania London
All, Just to spam you some more about (sorry!): Wikimania, Wikimedia's open knowledge conference, is moving on quickly, and will be held at the Barbican with about 4,000 people attending. *I am really keen to get some representation from the OSM community.* If anyone is interested in presenting about OpenStreetMap, Wikimedia UK can probably cover your costs - drop me an email! In theory presentation submissions can go in until the 31st March, but the quicker they go in the more people are likely to sign that they intend to attend them. So if you are planning to make a submission I would suggest putting at least an outline in now so that you give people the opportunity to signup to ones they might attend. You would still have the whole of March to finalise your submission. Submissions for Wikimania can be created from a link at the bottom of this page https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions. For those of you who haven't been to Wikimania, think State of the Map, but a little bigger and with more attendees from outside organisations. There'll also be a good chance to get an OSM/Wikidata crossover going - something I'm really keen on. All the best, Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 13 February 2014 13:23, Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: All, Wikipedia's global conference is in London this year, in August - see http://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page. I wondered if anyone was considering going, or submitting a talk on behalf of OSM? It may seem like a Wikipedia-centric event, but this year there'll be a lot of people (c. 4,000) attending and it'd be great to get some input from the OSM community (of whom I consider myself a part!) All the best, Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Possible vandalism? New Forth Road Bridge being changed to motorway from construction
Perhaps a 'preview' button, like Wikipedia has, which generates a rendering when clicked? Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 10 February 2014 12:19, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.comwrote: These users probably want a rendering. It's too easy to change the data, wait for it to render then grab the result. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Please don't edit Dawlish
You're sure we can't just change the track to bridge=suspended, suspensiontype=precariously? ;-) Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 6 February 2014 09:57, Jonathan Bennett jonobenn...@gmail.com wrote: Based on the Somerset Levels thread, I've realised someone will probably try to edit the railway line, station and other bits of Dawlish based on the storm damage. Please don't. Apart from the temporary nature of the damage (Network Rail are predicting a few weeks to fix the line) there's no practical advantage to be gained from taking the damaged section of rail off the map. It's not like rail travellers will try to get a train along the line unless they see a gap in OSM. If the damage turns out to be longer term than we're expecting then we can have another conversation about how to map it, but until then it would seem premature to start removing features from the map. J. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Warwickshire County Council releases aerial imagery
Hi Brian! This looks fantastic and will be really useful for Wikipedia too (Aerial views of significant buildings etc). However, the link you've provided obviously only works for mapping. Is there a regular HTML-based 'homepage' the describes the aerial imagery collection etc, that you know of? All the best, Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 14 January 2014 10:43, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone Warwickshire County Council have released 3 sets of aerial imagery under OGL. You can find them here *http://wppgeog3/gs/Aerial_Photography/wms http://wppgeog3/gs/Aerial_Photography/wms* . JOSM users just add to your imagery layers under preferences. I don't know how to add it to Potlatch, not being a heavy user. The best set is from 2012/13 at 12.5cm resolution which is both more up to date and more accurate than Bing. Naturally the imagery does not stop at the boundary so some of you in neighbouring counties might find this useful - not sure how far the imagery stretches - I'm too busy remapping inside Warwickshire using the imagery! We should acknowledge the source when tagging - I suggest Warwicks CC aerial imagery OGL2 Regards Brain ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Vanguard Way - Anyone from the Kent / Sussex border?
Although, granted, it's probably recorded incorrectly... Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 29 October 2013 23:27, Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.ukwrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanguard_Way: The *Vanguard Way* is a long distance walk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-distance_trail of around 66 miles from East Croydonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Croydon in outer London http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London to Newhavenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newhaven,_East_Sussex on the south coast of England http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 29 October 2013 23:02, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote: Just spotted this relation: http://www.openstreetmap.org/**browse/relation/86545http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/86545 There do seem to be an awful lot of roads and footpaths called Vanguard Way or blah / Vanguard Way in that relation. I'm guessing that perhaps on the ground they're not really called that... Cheers, andy __**_ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-gbhttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Hand-drawn OS maps on Wikimedia Commons
I believe, as well, that these are the original drafter's drawings: not later copies or prints. Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* On 26 September 2013 11:42, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: Over 100, hand-drawn OS maps have just been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Ordnance_Survey_Drawings These date from the 1810s and cover a variety of places in England and Wales. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb