Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-08 Thread Andy Robinson
John,

 

You might clarify what HA means by Plans. Typically major road projects
will be designed by one of the big UK or international Engineering firms
(AECOM, Atkins, Jacobs etc etc) who produce drawings of the project that are
used at various stages from planning through to construction. The HA almost
certainly have these drawings (Plans), especially those that are used at
planning and consultation stages. They may well also have them as electronic
CAD files which may or may not be loaded into some HA GIS system, I don't
know. Once a project is built the Contractor hands over as-built
data/drawings which then go into the record files of the HA, local authority
etc. The Ordnance Survey reference these for their mapping but at some point
will also re-survey (air or manual).

 

Anyway, regardless of the format the base for all these drawings and
electronic files is a mix of Ordnance Survey Mastermap data with additional
data gathered during a topographical survey by the Engineering Firm during
the planning and design process. Copyrights for data gathered by the
Engineering firm normally get transferred to the client who pays for the
work, so in theory the copyright will be a  mix of OS and HA or whoever the
ultimate client is.

 

At the end of the day, as mappers knowing when a new road is being built is
useful enough for our needs. The HA only builds a proportion of our new
infrastructure and feeds from Local Authorities are just as useful for
spotting new development (In Birmingham we follow planning application
notices to get a heads up). Knowing exactly the alignment of a new road is
less important because we can map it to the same degree of accuracy as every
other road OSM has from GPS, and eventually aerial imagery.

 

I don't see the earlier responses to this thread as a sign of negativity.
Obviously a dialogue with the HA would be very beneficial and could lead to
useful data being made available to us under terms that are acceptable.
However it is wrong to think that all the data big organisations hold is
useful to OSM, in my experience its often not, either because of licence
issues, or because of reliability and verifiability of the data itself.
Unfortunately our institutions and government bodies hold an awful lot of
poor quality data, its one of the reasons they are interested in working
with OSM. The DfT NapTAN dataset being a very good example.

 

Best of luck with the further discussions.

 

Cheers

Andy

 

From: John Baker [mailto:rovas...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: 06 July 2014 00:57
To: Rob Nickerson; Talk-GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

 

Rob,

To be fair when I did post that there had been a lack of interest. I asked
could we use the OS maps we currently use and nothing. 
I asked what people do currently and nothing.
You are the first to say that this could/should be ok. 

I am glad to see that someone is using this approach currently.

This is about getting a process in place so they use the correct data. They
have many types of data and we just need them to use the correct one (i.e
Opendata) so we can map with confidence. 
There was a desire to get the correct data so we can use it. He didn't
really understand and thought everything was ok (it is PD..., etc) I said I
need to check as we cannot use all different types of copyright material
some OS stuff could/should be ok. They have hundreds of different plans
hopefully it shouldn't be too much of an issue to use/create another one.

I will speak to them next week to see what I can sort out.

John

  _  

Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 21:19:55 +0100
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM
From: rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com
To: rovas...@hotmail.com; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org

On 5 July 2014 19:20, John Baker rovas...@hotmail.com wrote:

snip


I'll let them them know about the copyright situation (which I was fully
aware from day one was a concern) and there is no real interest from the OSM
community for establishing this.

 

John,

Please don't tell the Highways Agency that as it is *not* the case. The
blame lies with the Ordnance Survey and their reluctance to make it easy for
public sector bodies to release map data based on their products. I would
rather you highlight that to Highways Agency so that they know where the
real blame lies.

And yes, if they have maps that are based on OS OpenData (for example the OS
StreetView maps) then I would love to see them. This is how we are working
with Birmingham City Council to get maps of their proposed 20mph zones.

Perhaps step one is to find out what they have.

 

Rob

 

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-06 Thread Lester Caine
On 05/07/14 22:09, Philip Barnes wrote:
 Proposed highways should certainly not render,  for example I drove
 through Uttoxeter with osmand running and the proposed highways make the
 map pretty confusing. 

But we should be able to adjust the way osmand renders the data? As long
as it is tagged properly. But I've yet to get my own copy to even route
properly yet via B and 'C' roads. It takes me on a 9 mile detour going
north from here :(

-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-06 Thread Shaun McDonald
Another option to the GPS data, would be to use Mapillary to provide the latest 
images of the roads, and automatically a GPS trace is included too. This would 
mean that the images could be used for us to map alongside a feed of the 
changes that are known. This also has the advantage in that other surrounding 
things can be mapped too, and gets around any derived copyright issues in the 
maps that are created based on OS data.

Shaun

On 5 Jul 2014, at 17:47, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi John,
 
 The negativity, or least lack of enthusiasm, is partly due to the complexity 
 of the issue. We'd love to have Highways Agency data as open data but if the 
 data is based upon Ordnance Survey data this becomes a quite tricky. Normally 
 you would have the data holder apply for a Exemption under the Public Sector 
 Mapping Agreement (PSMA). Even then there's not much consensus in the GB 
 community as to whether we can actually use the data.
 
 As suggested, a better idea would be to have the Highways Agency provide us a 
 list of upcoming projects and dates that they are expected to complete. If 
 they have any GPS data we would be able to use that too :-)
 
 Rob
 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-05 Thread Rob Nickerson
Hi John,

The negativity, or least lack of enthusiasm, is partly due to the
complexity of the issue. We'd love to have Highways Agency data as open
data but if the data is based upon Ordnance Survey data this becomes a
quite tricky. Normally you would have the data holder apply for a Exemption
under the Public Sector Mapping Agreement (PSMA). Even then there's not
much consensus in the GB community as to whether we can actually use the
data.

As suggested, a better idea would be to have the Highways Agency provide us
a list of upcoming projects and dates that they are expected to complete.
If they have any GPS data we would be able to use that too :-)

Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-05 Thread Rob Nickerson
Thanks Phil, I agree that proposed highways should only be added (and
tagged as proposed) when they are certain to get built, however, we're not
talking about proposed highways here. We are talking about working with the
HA to get dates of road completions.

Rob

p.s. OSMand rendering is a matter for OSMAnd to decide. I suggest raising
it with them :-)


On 5 July 2014 18:11, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:

 I am not convinced proposed highways are especially useful in OSM, until
 construction starts they are just ideas and break the map what we see rule.

 Proposed highways should certainly not render,  for example I drove
 through Uttoxeter with osmand running and the proposed highways make the
 map pretty confusing.

 Phik (trigpoint )

 On Sat Jul 05 2014 17:47:39 GMT+0100 (BST), Rob Nickerson wrote:
  Hi John,
 
  The negativity, or least lack of enthusiasm, is partly due to the
  complexity of the issue. We'd love to have Highways Agency data as open
  data but if the data is based upon Ordnance Survey data this becomes a
  quite tricky. Normally you would have the data holder apply for a
 Exemption
  under the Public Sector Mapping Agreement (PSMA). Even then there's not
  much consensus in the GB community as to whether we can actually use the
  data.
 
  As suggested, a better idea would be to have the Highways Agency provide
 us
  a list of upcoming projects and dates that they are expected to complete.
  If they have any GPS data we would be able to use that too :-)
 
  Rob
 

 --
 Sent from my Jolla
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-05 Thread John Baker
My simple non-legal logic was we could use the same OS map we are allowed to 
use for tracing/information. If they based them on that and released maybe that 
would be ok. They did say they had hundreds of maps of the ongoing works and I 
hoped it was the case of just selecting the right one.

Well it seem no-one knows or cares if that is possible. It would have been nice 
to know what we can/cannot do with other data. Maybe if successful it could 
have been used for a blueprint for future opening up of data.

I'll let them them know about the copyright situation (which I was fully aware 
from day one was a concern) and there is no real interest from the OSM 
community for establishing this.

The highway agency already provides ongoing and upcoming projects on their 
website and have done for years. I see no value in them just sending me another 
list of these that I can share again.

Oh well the do-ocracy system of OSM once again descends into no-ocracy.
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 17:47:39 +0100
From: rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

Hi John,

The negativity, or least lack of enthusiasm, is partly due to the complexity of 
the issue. We'd love to have Highways Agency data as open data but if the data 
is based upon Ordnance Survey data this becomes a quite tricky. Normally you 
would have the data holder apply for a Exemption under the Public Sector 
Mapping Agreement (PSMA). Even then there's not much consensus in the GB 
community as to whether we can actually use the data.


As suggested, a better idea would be to have the Highways Agency provide us a 
list of upcoming projects and dates that they are expected to complete. If they 
have any GPS data we would be able to use that too :-)


Rob


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
  ___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-05 Thread Rob Nickerson
On 5 July 2014 19:20, John Baker rovas...@hotmail.com wrote:

 snip

 I'll let them them know about the copyright situation (which I was fully
 aware from day one was a concern) and there is no real interest from the
 OSM community for establishing this.


John,

Please don't tell the Highways Agency that as it is *not* the case. The
blame lies with the Ordnance Survey and their reluctance to make it easy
for public sector bodies to release map data based on their products. I
would rather you highlight that to Highways Agency so that they know where
the real blame lies.

And yes, if they have maps that are based on OS OpenData (for example the
OS StreetView maps) then I would love to see them. This is how we are
working with Birmingham City Council to get maps of their proposed 20mph
zones.

Perhaps step one is to find out what they have.

Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-05 Thread Philip Barnes
I am not convinced proposed highways are especially useful in OSM, until
construction starts they are just ideas and break the map what we see
rule. 

Proposed highways should certainly not render,  for example I drove
through Uttoxeter with osmand running and the proposed highways make the
map pretty confusing. 

Phil (trigpoint ) 

On Sat, 2014-07-05 at 17:47 +0100, Rob Nickerson wrote:
 Hi John,
 
 
 The negativity, or least lack of enthusiasm, is partly due to the
 complexity of the issue. We'd love to have Highways Agency data as
 open data but if the data is based upon Ordnance Survey data this
 becomes a quite tricky. Normally you would have the data holder apply
 for a Exemption under the Public Sector Mapping Agreement (PSMA). Even
 then there's not much consensus in the GB community as to whether we
 can actually use the data.
 
 As suggested, a better idea would be to have the Highways Agency
 provide us a list of upcoming projects and dates that they are
 expected to complete. If they have any GPS data we would be able to
 use that too :-)
 
 Rob
 
 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb



___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-05 Thread jonathan
I totally agree with Rob, we are tied by the law.  The OS need to 
realise that the data they hold was paid for by us and to restrict its 
use by Govt is plain wrong. The HA should understand this so they can 
pressure their Ministers to open things up.


http://bigfatfrog67.me

On 05/07/2014 21:19, Rob Nickerson wrote:
On 5 July 2014 19:20, John Baker rovas...@hotmail.com 
mailto:rovas...@hotmail.com wrote:


snip

I'll let them them know about the copyright situation (which I was
fully aware from day one was a concern) and there is no real
interest from the OSM community for establishing this.


John,

Please don't tell the Highways Agency that as it is *not* the case. 
The blame lies with the Ordnance Survey and their reluctance to make 
it easy for public sector bodies to release map data based on their 
products. I would rather you highlight that to Highways Agency so that 
they know where the real blame lies.


And yes, if they have maps that are based on OS OpenData (for example 
the OS StreetView maps) then I would love to see them. This is how we 
are working with Birmingham City Council to get maps of their proposed 
20mph zones.


Perhaps step one is to find out what they have.

Rob




___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-05 Thread John Baker
Rob,

To be fair when I did post that there had been a lack of interest. I asked 
could we use the OS maps we currently use and nothing. 
I asked what people do currently and nothing.
You are the first to say that this could/should be ok. 

I am glad to see that someone is using this approach currently.

This is about getting a process in place so they use the correct data. They 
have many types of data and we just need them to use the correct one (i.e 
Opendata) so we can map with confidence. 
There was a desire to get the correct data so we can use it. He didn't really 
understand and thought everything was ok (it is PD..., etc) I said I need to 
check as we cannot use all different types of copyright material some OS stuff 
could/should be ok. They have hundreds of different plans hopefully it 
shouldn't be too much of an issue to use/create another one.

I will speak to them next week to see what I can sort out.

John

Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 21:19:55 +0100
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM
From: rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com
To: rovas...@hotmail.com; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org

On 5 July 2014 19:20, John Baker rovas...@hotmail.com wrote:




snip

I'll let them them know about the copyright situation (which I was fully aware 
from day one was a concern) and there is no real interest from the OSM 
community for establishing this.



John,

Please don't tell the Highways Agency that as it is *not* the case. The blame 
lies with the Ordnance Survey and their reluctance to make it easy for public 
sector bodies to release map data based on their products. I would rather you 
highlight that to Highways Agency so that they know where the real blame lies.


And yes, if they have maps that are based on OS OpenData (for example the OS 
StreetView maps) then I would love to see them. This is how we are working with 
Birmingham City Council to get maps of their proposed 20mph zones.


Perhaps step one is to find out what they have.

Rob


  ___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-04 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 3 July 2014 17:51, John Baker rovas...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Once the legal hurdle has been overcome the idea is to setup a process
 stream so they can let me/us know what is happening (a simple spreadsheet or
 something) and get it added to OSM quickly.

A better approach would be to get them to publish details of the new
works as open data, so that anyone may reuse it, including but not
only OSM. The Open Data User Group can advise:

   https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/open-data-user-group

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


[Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-03 Thread John Baker
Hi,

I have been talking to the Highways Agency who are keen to get more recent 
changes on OSM. They want to get all the new roads added and therefore added to 
the routers.
(the initial contact was http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=25553 
if you want a little background)

Things like:
http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/road-projects/A23-Handcross-to-Warninglid

As contact has been made I have been discussing how best to get the plans of 
the works and the proper dialogue for the relevant changes (e.g. more 
interested in new roads rather than minor works/roadworks and road widening) 
and a timeline (project  under construction now, project 2 completed, etc)

I was hoping to upload these plans somewhere so they could be traced by people.

The first thing I am worried about is the copyright of the various plans. 
Some/many seem to be derived from OS maps.

Now I am no expert on the copyright situation here and dialogue is difficult 
they know little about OSM really. He just said we release the plans and they 
are public domain.

Now they apparently have hundreds of plans. And only choose to release 1 on the 
website (if at all) these can be 

http://www.highways.gov.uk/publications/a23-handcross-to-warninglid-plan-of-approved-scheme/
http://www.highways.gov.uk/publications/a45a46-tollbar-end-improvement-proposed-scheme-plan/

We could in theory get access to other plans of the works.

Does anyone know what legally I can use (really so I/we can republish/upload it 
so we can use them as imagery)?
Would plan derived from the current OS map we can use be ok? Are those more 
detailed ones ok?

I know legal stuff is a minefield but I am hoping someone can point me in the 
correct direction.

Once the legal hurdle has been overcome the idea is to setup a process stream 
so they can let me/us know what is happening (a simple spreadsheet or 
something) and get it added to OSM quickly.

I have never dealt with any organisation before for getting things into OSM so 
I am a little lost on the best way to proceed so any advice/help will be useful.

Cheers,

John







  ___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-03 Thread Andy Allan
On 3 July 2014 17:51, John Baker rovas...@hotmail.com wrote:
 He just said we release the plans and
 they are public domain.

Public Domain (British English, especially Government and in the
Courts): Information known by the public, could be under any kind of
copyright
Public Domain (US English): Information available for unrestricted reuse.

So you could say The contents of all the Harry Potter books are in
the Public Domain and in the UK that just means the general public
knows what's in the books, rather than anyone having permission to
upload them to Project Gutenberg :-)

Cheers,
Andy

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-03 Thread Chris Hill

On 03/07/14 17:51, John Baker wrote:
The first thing I am worried about is the copyright of the various 
plans. Some/many seem to be derived from OS maps.


A legitimate concern.


Now I am no expert on the copyright situation here and dialogue is 
difficult they know little about OSM really. He just said we release 
the plans and they are public domain.


There is no mechanism in the UK for a body like the Highways Agency to 
release data as PD. That is a mechanism used in countries like the US. 
In the UK the info would have to be licensed using a specific licence, 
such as the Open Government Licence. If the plans are based on OS maps 
then OS would have to agree to release this, according to OS's 
interpretation of copyright law. OS probably will not agree to this, but 
it is worth asking :-).


Without a suitably agreed licence we cannot trace such plans into OSM. 
You could visit the site and get GPS traces  photos to add such works 
to OSM, which is usually what happens as soon as a new road gets opened.


I'd be interested if the Highway's Agency have opened new roads and they 
are not included in OSM very soon after. That seems to me to be 
something we are pretty good at.


--
Cheers, Chris
user: chillly


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-03 Thread John Baker
Yeah I know he probably didn't understand the implications/view points on it. I 
should have explained that better, rather than just ...
Anyway he was talking about open source, etc and he meant it in the (modern) 
open source style of public domain.
But the point was I didn't believe him that we could just republish it. So I am 
wanting to know what we can use.

(actually the guy I spoke to didn't sound like he was even from the UK... - 
Australian maybe but that is whole different story)

 Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 18:05:55 +0100
 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM
 From: gravityst...@gmail.com
 To: rovas...@hotmail.com
 CC: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
 
 On 3 July 2014 17:51, John Baker rovas...@hotmail.com wrote:
  He just said we release the plans and
  they are public domain.
 
 Public Domain (British English, especially Government and in the
 Courts): Information known by the public, could be under any kind of
 copyright
 Public Domain (US English): Information available for unrestricted reuse.
 
 So you could say The contents of all the Harry Potter books are in
 the Public Domain and in the UK that just means the general public
 knows what's in the books, rather than anyone having permission to
 upload them to Project Gutenberg :-)
 
 Cheers,
 Andy
  ___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-03 Thread John Baker

Yeah I know we are pretty good at adding them. But this discussion started with 
the HA because there were roads that were not on OSM.

It was this project that he was working on.
http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/road-projects/a23-handcross-to-warninglid/

So I personally added this in a rough way based on the descriptions from him 
who was on site at the time and the plans that were there (I didn't trace them 
just looked at them).

I don't (for a change) want to get into conversation about tracing imagery vs. 
doing it by hand. The point is what can we use.

My thought were that if there plans were based on the OS streetview (rather 
than the more detailed ones) then we could use them. 


 Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 18:23:34 +0100
 From: o...@raggedred.net
 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM
 
 On 03/07/14 17:51, John Baker wrote:
  The first thing I am worried about is the copyright of the various 
  plans. Some/many seem to be derived from OS maps.
 
 A legitimate concern.
 
  Now I am no expert on the copyright situation here and dialogue is 
  difficult they know little about OSM really. He just said we release 
  the plans and they are public domain.
 
 There is no mechanism in the UK for a body like the Highways Agency to 
 release data as PD. That is a mechanism used in countries like the US. 
 In the UK the info would have to be licensed using a specific licence, 
 such as the Open Government Licence. If the plans are based on OS maps 
 then OS would have to agree to release this, according to OS's 
 interpretation of copyright law. OS probably will not agree to this, but 
 it is worth asking :-).
 
 Without a suitably agreed licence we cannot trace such plans into OSM. 
 You could visit the site and get GPS traces  photos to add such works 
 to OSM, which is usually what happens as soon as a new road gets opened.
 
 I'd be interested if the Highway's Agency have opened new roads and they 
 are not included in OSM very soon after. That seems to me to be 
 something we are pretty good at.
 
 -- 
 Cheers, Chris
 user: chillly
 
 
 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
  ___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-03 Thread Dan S
You know, rather than thinking about automatically importing any of
their data into OSM, my intuition is that given the concerns about OS
copyright, plus how much OSMers enjoy mapping new features, I'd
suggest using their data to create a web feed of Hot new roads for
mappers to go and survey! - I bet they'd all be mapped within a week
;)

Dan

2014-07-03 18:41 GMT+01:00 John Baker rovas...@hotmail.com:

 Yeah I know we are pretty good at adding them. But this discussion started
 with the HA because there were roads that were not on OSM.

 It was this project that he was working on.
 http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/road-projects/a23-handcross-to-warninglid/

 So I personally added this in a rough way based on the descriptions from him
 who was on site at the time and the plans that were there (I didn't trace
 them just looked at them).

 I don't (for a change) want to get into conversation about tracing imagery
 vs. doing it by hand. The point is what can we use.

 My thought were that if there plans were based on the OS streetview (rather
 than the more detailed ones) then we could use them.


 Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 18:23:34 +0100
 From: o...@raggedred.net
 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org

 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

 On 03/07/14 17:51, John Baker wrote:
  The first thing I am worried about is the copyright of the various
  plans. Some/many seem to be derived from OS maps.

 A legitimate concern.
 
  Now I am no expert on the copyright situation here and dialogue is
  difficult they know little about OSM really. He just said we release
  the plans and they are public domain.

 There is no mechanism in the UK for a body like the Highways Agency to
 release data as PD. That is a mechanism used in countries like the US.
 In the UK the info would have to be licensed using a specific licence,
 such as the Open Government Licence. If the plans are based on OS maps
 then OS would have to agree to release this, according to OS's
 interpretation of copyright law. OS probably will not agree to this, but
 it is worth asking :-).

 Without a suitably agreed licence we cannot trace such plans into OSM.
 You could visit the site and get GPS traces  photos to add such works
 to OSM, which is usually what happens as soon as a new road gets opened.

 I'd be interested if the Highway's Agency have opened new roads and they
 are not included in OSM very soon after. That seems to me to be
 something we are pretty good at.

 --
 Cheers, Chris
 user: chillly


 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-03 Thread Shaun McDonald
Maybe a simple method is to use the OSM notes system, which is what the feature 
was designed for?

Shaun

On 3 Jul 2014, at 19:10, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com wrote:

 You know, rather than thinking about automatically importing any of
 their data into OSM, my intuition is that given the concerns about OS
 copyright, plus how much OSMers enjoy mapping new features, I'd
 suggest using their data to create a web feed of Hot new roads for
 mappers to go and survey! - I bet they'd all be mapped within a week
 ;)
 
 Dan
 
 2014-07-03 18:41 GMT+01:00 John Baker rovas...@hotmail.com:
 
 Yeah I know we are pretty good at adding them. But this discussion started
 with the HA because there were roads that were not on OSM.
 
 It was this project that he was working on.
 http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/road-projects/a23-handcross-to-warninglid/
 
 So I personally added this in a rough way based on the descriptions from him
 who was on site at the time and the plans that were there (I didn't trace
 them just looked at them).
 
 I don't (for a change) want to get into conversation about tracing imagery
 vs. doing it by hand. The point is what can we use.
 
 My thought were that if there plans were based on the OS streetview (rather
 than the more detailed ones) then we could use them.
 
 
 Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 18:23:34 +0100
 From: o...@raggedred.net
 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
 
 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM
 
 On 03/07/14 17:51, John Baker wrote:
 The first thing I am worried about is the copyright of the various
 plans. Some/many seem to be derived from OS maps.
 
 A legitimate concern.
 
 Now I am no expert on the copyright situation here and dialogue is
 difficult they know little about OSM really. He just said we release
 the plans and they are public domain.
 
 There is no mechanism in the UK for a body like the Highways Agency to
 release data as PD. That is a mechanism used in countries like the US.
 In the UK the info would have to be licensed using a specific licence,
 such as the Open Government Licence. If the plans are based on OS maps
 then OS would have to agree to release this, according to OS's
 interpretation of copyright law. OS probably will not agree to this, but
 it is worth asking :-).
 
 Without a suitably agreed licence we cannot trace such plans into OSM.
 You could visit the site and get GPS traces  photos to add such works
 to OSM, which is usually what happens as soon as a new road gets opened.
 
 I'd be interested if the Highway's Agency have opened new roads and they
 are not included in OSM very soon after. That seems to me to be
 something we are pretty good at.
 
 --
 Cheers, Chris
 user: chillly
 
 
 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
 
 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
 
 
 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-03 Thread John Baker






I am a little surprised at the negativity. I would have thought it would be 
welcomed that the highway agency want to engage with OSM to help get the most 
up-to-date map available. I thought we prided ourselves of having the most 
up-to-date map.

We currently have roads under construction (and proposed but I have avoided 
adding these with my chats with the HA as things can change) in OSM.

I am confused as how you think people get these into OSM in the first place. 
Often they already use sources (I see it in the source tags often and I have 
been looking over the last few weeks at many of these proposed and constructed 
roads to get a feel about what the data is like) like the highway agency for 
England for the major roads.

What I want to do is streamline and improve this process as mappers in the UK 
(it might not be you) do use these resources already. And often they guess from 
the information available if proper detailed aligned detailed plans existed 
that would be much better and easier too. Maybe these mappers are not on this 
list. *shrug*

If there was a system/process in place that had accurate plans (allowed 
copyright) and timelines from an authorised source when construction began, 
when the road is opened, etc. We could use this. How we use it is a different 
matter - maybe someone wants to survey it, maybe someone wants to trace it.

I have visions of mappers jumping fences and running under the cover of 
darkness down half built roads with their expensive GPS devices just to get the 
info in OSM. 

Personally I think already showing on the map a road under construction is way 
more informative that simply adding a note. Once it opens then someone can make 
it 'live'.

I am not automatically importing anything here. It is not about that.

Maybe it is just down to how much OSMers enjoy mapping new features in their 
area.


 From: sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk
 Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 20:30:15 +0100
 To: danstowell+...@gmail.com
 CC: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM
 
 Maybe a simple method is to use the OSM notes system, which is what the 
 feature was designed for?
 
 Shaun
 
 On 3 Jul 2014, at 19:10, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  You know, rather than thinking about automatically importing any of
  their data into OSM, my intuition is that given the concerns about OS
  copyright, plus how much OSMers enjoy mapping new features, I'd
  suggest using their data to create a web feed of Hot new roads for
  mappers to go and survey! - I bet they'd all be mapped within a week
  ;)
  
  Dan
  
  2014-07-03 18:41 GMT+01:00 John Baker rovas...@hotmail.com:
  
  Yeah I know we are pretty good at adding them. But this discussion started
  with the HA because there were roads that were not on OSM.
  
  It was this project that he was working on.
  http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/road-projects/a23-handcross-to-warninglid/
  
  So I personally added this in a rough way based on the descriptions from 
  him
  who was on site at the time and the plans that were there (I didn't trace
  them just looked at them).
  
  I don't (for a change) want to get into conversation about tracing imagery
  vs. doing it by hand. The point is what can we use.
  
  My thought were that if there plans were based on the OS streetview (rather
  than the more detailed ones) then we could use them.
  
  
  Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 18:23:34 +0100
  From: o...@raggedred.net
  To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
  
  Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM
  
  On 03/07/14 17:51, John Baker wrote:
  The first thing I am worried about is the copyright of the various
  plans. Some/many seem to be derived from OS maps.
  
  A legitimate concern.
  
  Now I am no expert on the copyright situation here and dialogue is
  difficult they know little about OSM really. He just said we release
  the plans and they are public domain.
  
  There is no mechanism in the UK for a body like the Highways Agency to
  release data as PD. That is a mechanism used in countries like the US.
  In the UK the info would have to be licensed using a specific licence,
  such as the Open Government Licence. If the plans are based on OS maps
  then OS would have to agree to release this, according to OS's
  interpretation of copyright law. OS probably will not agree to this, but
  it is worth asking :-).
  
  Without a suitably agreed licence we cannot trace such plans into OSM.
  You could visit the site and get GPS traces  photos to add such works
  to OSM, which is usually what happens as soon as a new road gets opened.
  
  I'd be interested if the Highway's Agency have opened new roads and they
  are not included in OSM very soon after. That seems to me to be
  something we are pretty good at.
  
  --
  Cheers, Chris
  user: chillly
  
  
  ___
  Talk-GB mailing list
  Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
  https

Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

2014-07-03 Thread Dan S
OK sorry, I shouldn't have said automatically importing, that was a
misrepresentation. But I didn't intend negativity, I thought I was
offering a positive suggestion of how to work with their data! Yes of
course the news in your email was great to see, it would definitely be
lovely to have their plans as an imagery layer. And good point about
the under-construction roads.

Dan

2014-07-03 21:36 GMT+01:00 John Baker rovas...@hotmail.com:
 I am a little surprised at the negativity. I would have thought it would be
 welcomed that the highway agency want to engage with OSM to help get the
 most up-to-date map available. I thought we prided ourselves of having the
 most up-to-date map.

 We currently have roads under construction (and proposed but I have avoided
 adding these with my chats with the HA as things can change) in OSM.

 I am confused as how you think people get these into OSM in the first place.
 Often they already use sources (I see it in the source tags often and I have
 been looking over the last few weeks at many of these proposed and
 constructed roads to get a feel about what the data is like) like the
 highway agency for England for the major roads.

 What I want to do is streamline and improve this process as mappers in the
 UK (it might not be you) do use these resources already. And often they
 guess from the information available if proper detailed aligned detailed
 plans existed that would be much better and easier too. Maybe these mappers
 are not on this list. *shrug*

 If there was a system/process in place that had accurate plans (allowed
 copyright) and timelines from an authorised source when construction began,
 when the road is opened, etc. We could use this. How we use it is a
 different matter - maybe someone wants to survey it, maybe someone wants to
 trace it.

 I have visions of mappers jumping fences and running under the cover of
 darkness down half built roads with their expensive GPS devices just to get
 the info in OSM.

 Personally I think already showing on the map a road under construction is
 way more informative that simply adding a note. Once it opens then someone
 can make it 'live'.

 I am not automatically importing anything here. It is not about that.

 Maybe it is just down to how much OSMers enjoy mapping new features in
 their area.


 From: sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk
 Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 20:30:15 +0100
 To: danstowell+...@gmail.com
 CC: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org

 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM

 Maybe a simple method is to use the OSM notes system, which is what the
 feature was designed for?

 Shaun

 On 3 Jul 2014, at 19:10, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com wrote:

  You know, rather than thinking about automatically importing any of
  their data into OSM, my intuition is that given the concerns about OS
  copyright, plus how much OSMers enjoy mapping new features, I'd
  suggest using their data to create a web feed of Hot new roads for
  mappers to go and survey! - I bet they'd all be mapped within a week
  ;)
 
  Dan
 
  2014-07-03 18:41 GMT+01:00 John Baker rovas...@hotmail.com:
 
  Yeah I know we are pretty good at adding them. But this discussion
  started
  with the HA because there were roads that were not on OSM.
 
  It was this project that he was working on.
 
  http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/road-projects/a23-handcross-to-warninglid/
 
  So I personally added this in a rough way based on the descriptions
  from him
  who was on site at the time and the plans that were there (I didn't
  trace
  them just looked at them).
 
  I don't (for a change) want to get into conversation about tracing
  imagery
  vs. doing it by hand. The point is what can we use.
 
  My thought were that if there plans were based on the OS streetview
  (rather
  than the more detailed ones) then we could use them.
 
 
  Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 18:23:34 +0100
  From: o...@raggedred.net
  To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
 
  Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Getting Highway Agency information into OSM
 
  On 03/07/14 17:51, John Baker wrote:
  The first thing I am worried about is the copyright of the various
  plans. Some/many seem to be derived from OS maps.
 
  A legitimate concern.
 
  Now I am no expert on the copyright situation here and dialogue is
  difficult they know little about OSM really. He just said we release
  the plans and they are public domain.
 
  There is no mechanism in the UK for a body like the Highways Agency to
  release data as PD. That is a mechanism used in countries like the US.
  In the UK the info would have to be licensed using a specific licence,
  such as the Open Government Licence. If the plans are based on OS maps
  then OS would have to agree to release this, according to OS's
  interpretation of copyright law. OS probably will not agree to this,
  but
  it is worth asking :-).
 
  Without a suitably agreed licence we cannot trace such plans into OSM.
  You could visit the site and get GPS traces  photos