Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project - postboxes
On Mon Apr 13 23:59:14 2015 GMT+0100, Pierre Riteau wrote: I have followed this proposal too. Example for a Franked mail only post box: mail:meter = yes mail:stamped = no I do not understand where the word meter comes from in this concept. Surely mail:franked=yes mail:stamped=no Boxes are labeled franked mail only, can you put print postage at home stuff in a franked only box? Phil (trigpoint ) On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, at 03:19 PM, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: On 13 April 2015 at 12:22, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote: Came across 2 postboxes today, side-by-side, one with 1st Class and one with 2nd class. Two wall-mounted box refs so not 2 apertures on the same pillar. I couldn't see anything in the wiki on how to treat these so I tagged them postbox:restriction= 1st class mail only and 2nd class mail only. Is there something somewhere already established or do we need a consensus on how to tag these? I don't recall any recent specific discussion about this, and hence don't think there's a definite consensus. But if you look at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/osm-tag-keys.html it would seem that the most popular method would be to add mail:meter=yes/no, mail:first_class=yes/no, etc. This would be consistent with the suggestions in the abandoned proposal at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_post_box . But there are also a few instances of mailtypes=* as well, and even fewer of class=* in use. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- Sent from my Jolla ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project - postboxes
On 14 April 2015 at 09:54, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote: On Mon Apr 13 23:59:14 2015 GMT+0100, Pierre Riteau wrote: I have followed this proposal too. Example for a Franked mail only post box: mail:meter = yes mail:stamped = no I do not understand where the word meter comes from in this concept. Surely mail:franked=yes mail:stamped=no Boxes are labeled franked mail only, can you put print postage at home stuff in a franked only box? Only if it's franked. -- Mike. @millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property pets* TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project - postboxes
I have followed this proposal too. Example for a Franked mail only post box: mail:meter = yes mail:stamped = no On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, at 03:19 PM, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: On 13 April 2015 at 12:22, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote: Came across 2 postboxes today, side-by-side, one with 1st Class and one with 2nd class. Two wall-mounted box refs so not 2 apertures on the same pillar. I couldn't see anything in the wiki on how to treat these so I tagged them postbox:restriction= 1st class mail only and 2nd class mail only. Is there something somewhere already established or do we need a consensus on how to tag these? I don't recall any recent specific discussion about this, and hence don't think there's a definite consensus. But if you look at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/osm-tag-keys.html it would seem that the most popular method would be to add mail:meter=yes/no, mail:first_class=yes/no, etc. This would be consistent with the suggestions in the abandoned proposal at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_post_box . But there are also a few instances of mailtypes=* as well, and even fewer of class=* in use. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] Quarterly Project - postboxes
Came across 2 postboxes today, side-by-side, one with 1st Class and one with 2nd class. Two wall-mounted box refs so not 2 apertures on the same pillar. I couldn't see anything in the wiki on how to treat these so I tagged them postbox:restriction= 1st class mail only and 2nd class mail only. Is there something somewhere already established or do we need a consensus on how to tag these? Rgds Brian ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project - postboxes
On 13 April 2015 at 12:22, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote: Came across 2 postboxes today, side-by-side, one with 1st Class and one with 2nd class. Two wall-mounted box refs so not 2 apertures on the same pillar. I couldn't see anything in the wiki on how to treat these so I tagged them postbox:restriction= 1st class mail only and 2nd class mail only. Is there something somewhere already established or do we need a consensus on how to tag these? I don't recall any recent specific discussion about this, and hence don't think there's a definite consensus. But if you look at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/osm-tag-keys.html it would seem that the most popular method would be to add mail:meter=yes/no, mail:first_class=yes/no, etc. This would be consistent with the suggestions in the abandoned proposal at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_post_box . But there are also a few instances of mailtypes=* as well, and even fewer of class=* in use. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project - postboxes
On 13 April 2015 at 12:22, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote: Came across 2 postboxes today, side-by-side, one with 1st Class and one with 2nd class. Two wall-mounted box refs so not 2 apertures on the same pillar. I couldn't see anything in the wiki on how to treat these so I tagged them postbox:restriction= 1st class mail only and 2nd class mail only. Is there something somewhere already established or do we need a consensus on how to tag these? Rgds Brian Tag them however you think is appropriate. The 'correct way' will be revealed in due course (10 years?) -- Mike. @millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property pets* TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
