(Added talk-ht@osm as that might well reach some ppl involved that the other 
lists don't.)

Having bn part of the below-mentioned #OSM IRC discussion (finally using irc 
after 15 years of avoiding, ayii!) Here's my 2 cents:

The OSM Haiti data's v1 odbl complient edit rates for nodes and ways are 68% 
and 54%, respectively. v1+last edit comopliency rates are 89 and 95%, 
respectively.

These figures r for data of the whole island and the losses in DR are 
_significantly_ higher. That will have a partial impact on e.g. Local 
OpenGeo-related economic activity, which has a direct link with local 
sustainable hunanitarian activities and all data activity on the Haitian side.

In any case the direct impact is -- in my guesstimate -- to at least a quarter 
of Haiti data. And the viability of OSM will take a clear hit because of this. 
And that impacts humanitarian use without a doubt. Unless there's a renewed 
interest to help remap Haiti from the community -- or(/and) the data damage is 
limited in some ways.

The thing is that we (in and currently actively involved with Haiti mapping) 
are limited in capacity to do more advanced data loss mitigation and I think 
also the capacity to remap is limited in a number of ways.

So, having heard that some gave and got a special right to allow retaining his 
data in OSM for a given bbox _in the U.S._ I don't see why we wouldn't try that 
in Haiti as well as other humanitarian operations areas.

With best regards from Haiti,
-Jaakko
http://osm.org/user/jaakkoh

Sent from my BlackBerry® device from Digicel
--
Mobile: +509-37-26 91 54, Skype/GoogleTalk: jhelleranta

-----Original Message-----
From: "Larry O'Neill" <larryone...@gmail.com>
Sender: crisismapp...@googlegroups.com
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:23:10 
To: hot<h...@openstreetmap.org>; <crisismapp...@googlegroups.com>; OSM 
Talk<t...@openstreetmap.org>
Reply-To: crisismapp...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [CrisisMappers] odbl non-agreement and humanitarian exceptions.

Hi All,

Apologies for any overlap in recipients for this - I very rarely post to
mailing lists, so I am not sure how wide a net for this issue would be
appropriate.

There was a discussion on the #osm irc channel recently about the
possibility of approaching non-agreers to the new CT about any data they
may have contributed to areas where the removal of such data could have a
negative effect on our humanitarian efforts.
Looking for example at how much data we stand to lose in Haiti, this is
something that may limit the difficulty of those that are on the ground in
these places and struggling to remap.

The possibility of haing a bounding box around areas such as these was
mentioned - and there is aparantly a precedent for a users data within a BB
being retained.

Any thoughts, comments, or points?

Thanks,
Larry O'Neill

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CrisisMappers" group.
To post to this group, send email to crisismapp...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
crisismappers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/crisismappers?hl=en.


_______________________________________________
Talk-ht mailing list
Talk-ht@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ht

Reply via email to