[osm-ve] Convocatoria de Humanitarian Openstreetmap Team -pool para el Hub Alpha LATAM

2021-12-25 Per discussione Celine Jacquin
Estimad@s colegas,

Comparto aquí un mensaje que también envío a los canales de telegram.

Vari@s de ustedes han escuchado y participado durante el semestre pasado a
las consultas a la comunidad que organizó HOT respecto al proyecto de Hub
regional en Latam.

Aquí
https://www.hotosm.org/updates/hub-de-mapeo-abierto-en-latam-actualizacion-diciembre-2021/
se explica cómo ha sido el proceso de construcción de este Hub hasta ahora,
y que el primer semestre de 2022 será un periodo de experimento con una
fase llamada "Hub Alpha" donde se desarrollaran algunos proyectos en temas
cruciales de la región, que permitirán además desarrollar vínculos con la
comunidad y organizaciones locales.

Para iniciar el trabajo alrededor de estos proyectos, y mientras se sepa
qué roles son necesarios en el futuro hub, se pretende formar un grupo o
pool inicial con personas que tengan un poco de disponibilidad y que deseen
ser parte de ello. Se dirige en particular a contribuidores de OSM Latam y
de comunidades cercanas (si pueden compartir), para tener perfiles de
personas con las cuales trabajar en distintos aspectos, cómo se vayan
diseñando las oportunidades (junto con las perosnas participantes y las
comunidades).

Como la colaboración es temporal y de tiempo parcial de momento, se
adaptará a lo que las personas estén dispuesta y deseen hacer.  Pueden
registrar allí sus intereses y disponibilidades:
https://hotosm.bamboohr.com/jobs/view.php?id=79.

Para saber más de este proceso pueden seguir las redes sociales de HOT.

Saludos! Felices fiestas!
@mapeadora
Ciudad de México  *Mexico City*|CST / UTC -06:00 (Winter)   -05:00
(Summer)
___
Talk-ve mailing list
Talk-ve@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ve


[Talk-pe] Convocatoria de Humanitarian Openstreetmap Team -pool para el Hub Alpha LATAM

2021-12-24 Per discussione Celine Jacquin
Estimad@s colegas,

Comparto aquí un mensaje que también envío a los canales de telegram.

Vari@s de ustedes han escuchado y participado durante el semestre pasado a
las consultas a la comunidad que organizó HOT respecto al proyecto de Hub
regional en Latam.

Aquí
https://www.hotosm.org/updates/hub-de-mapeo-abierto-en-latam-actualizacion-diciembre-2021/
se explica cómo ha sido el proceso de construcción de este Hub hasta ahora,
y que el primer semestre de 2022 será un periodo de experimento con una
fase llamada "Hub Alpha" donde se desarrollaran algunos proyectos en temas
cruciales de la región, que permitirán además desarrollar vínculos con la
comunidad y organizaciones locales.

Para iniciar el trabajo alrededor de estos proyectos, y mientras se sepa
qué roles son necesarios en el futuro hub, se pretende formar un grupo o
pool inicial con personas que tengan un poco de disponibilidad y que deseen
ser parte de ello. Se dirige en particular a contribuidores de OSM Latam y
de comunidades cercanas (si pueden compartir), para tener perfiles de
personas con las cuales trabajar en distintos aspectos, cómo se vayan
diseñando las oportunidades (junto con las perosnas participantes y las
comunidades).

Como la colaboración es temporal y de tiempo parcial de momento, se
adaptará a lo que las personas estén dispuesta y deseen hacer.  Pueden
registrar allí sus intereses y disponibilidades:
https://hotosm.bamboohr.com/jobs/view.php?id=79.

Para saber más de este proceso pueden seguir las redes sociales de HOT.

Saludos! Felices fiestas!
@mapeadora
Ciudad de México  *Mexico City*|CST / UTC -06:00 (Winter)   -05:00
(Summer)
___
Talk-pe mailing list
Talk-pe@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe


[OSM-talk] Fwd: Call to Take Action and Confront Systemic Offensive Behavior in the OSM Community

2020-12-10 Per discussione Celine Jacquin
 and trying, more and better
all the time, in good faith*.

- We generally, all life, "assume good faith" from people, which is a way
to normalize violence. But there are limits, and the accumulation sometimes
luckily leads us to try to improve things. I personally wonder why it is so
difficult to accept to try to improve things and improve our relationship
skills in a community project. Improving is only a positive notion. So why
do we read so much resistance? I hope this will serve to lead people to
self-questioning.
This can lead us to a wider debate: should violence be a context that we
must embrace, and develop our skills to tolerate and endure it, and to live
the traumas that it produces to us, and to reproduce the same on more
people? Or should we try to eradicate or at least reduce violence in our
behavior?


Thanks for your patience in reading this large message.
Best


Céline Jacquin


El jue, 10 de dic. de 2020 a la(s) 07:42, arnalie faye vicario (
afsvica...@gmail.com) escribió:

> Hello/kumusta,
>
> What an overwhelming response!
>
> This is my first time to email thru the global osm talk; it really takes
> true grit to join the conversations, huge thanks to the people who inspired
> me and sparked the flame.
>
> I will keep it short and redirect you to a (short) OSM Diary I wrote on
> Why WOMEN are pushing for a safe and inclusive space in OSM:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/arnalielsewhere/diary/395064
>
> A slide from @mapmakerdavid states "it takes good relationships to
> navigate an ocean.”
>
> =Arnalie
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 10, 2020, at 8:01 PM, James  wrote:
>
> 
> > The lack of discussion by non-men is an undeniable fact.
>
> >Right, this is true. Sadly true. Something I also know from Linux
> Communities and other Open Source/Open Data Communities.
>
> Same in programming and IT fields, firefighters, mechanics, carpenters,
> construction workers, taxi drivers, etc etc...
>
> Now is it a simple lack of interest in the field? Gate keeping?
> Discrimination/Sexism? Is it because of tradition that is still lingering?
>
> We should work with other humans and see why as well as question ourselves
> what can we do/change?
>
> We should treat other fellow humans, despite sex, race or country of
> origin, as we would want to be treated.
>
> Would you like to be put down based on your employer, despite your
> knowledge? Probably not, then don't do it
>
> Would you like to be put down based on your genitalia, despite being quite
> knowledgeable? No? Then don't do it.
>
> On Thu., Dec. 10, 2020, 6:38 a.m. tilmanreinecke--- via talk, <
> talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>> > The lack of discussion by non-men is an undeniable fact.
>>
>> Right, this is true. Sadly true. Something I also know from Linux
>> Communities and other Open Source/Open Data Communities.
>>
>> > The simplest explanation for this is the systematic institutional
>> hostility towards women in the OSM community.
>>
>> I did not hear about something like that what can be called "systematic".
>> Are you sure that we have something like that in OSM? If yes, then please
>> point to where that happened. I am pretty sure that this is not something
>> systematic. I know women not feeling this way as you because OpenStreetMap
>> is an open and welcoming community.
>>
>> Greetings
>>
>> Sören
>>
>>
>>  Original Message 
>> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Call to Take Action and Confront Systemic
>> Offensive Behavior in the OSM Community
>> From: Clay Smalley
>> To: Celine Jacquin
>> CC: osmf-t...@openstreetmap.org,osm
>>
>>
>> I'm noticing a pattern here in the replies to this email:
>>
>> Only men have replied. This is, unfortunately, par for the course on the
>> OSM mailing lists. The lack of discussion by non-men is an undeniable fact.
>> The simplest explanation for this is the systematic institutional hostility
>> towards women in the OSM community. The replies themselves are the best
>> evidence of this.
>>
>> These men replying have taken it upon themselves to explain to a woman
>> what constitutes misogyny. News flash: you do not get to decide what
>> offends other people. If you are a man, misogyny will never happen to you
>> by definition. If you are a man, you have never been, are not, and will
>> never be a victim of misogyny. This isn't your area of expertise. Listen to
>> the experts.
>>
>> Some men replying have even mentioned how this draft letter hurts their
>> feelings. These men need to slow down and consider for a moment that their
>> tempora

[OSM-talk] Call to Take Action and Confront Systemic Offensive Behavior in the OSM Community

2020-12-09 Per discussione Celine Jacquin
Hello everybody
I hope you are all well

We, several groups, chapters, organizations and individuals, have reacted
to the conversation in the osm-talk-list (
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2020-December/085692.html)
considering that it is an incident symptomatic of the problem we have faced
for many years in the community, which is one of the greatest obstacles to
diversity at all levels of OSM. Time to make a real change.
That is why we have developed a beginning of statement on the desirable
mechanisms to work solidly on the rules of coexistence and improve
diversity.

We bring it to your attention and invite anyone who feels represented to
sign it. Translations are in preparation (any help is welcome):
https://docs.google.com/document/d/130JCTX9ve4H4ORXznmIVTpXiN3TX8nRGA8ayuTZ9ECI/edit?usp=sharing


On behalf of the signatories
Best regards

Céline Jacquin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] I’m running for OSMF board and I’ve set up office hours for questions

2020-12-07 Per discussione Celine Jacquin
  3. srsly?! | Re:  I’m running for OSMF board and I’ve set up
  office hours for questions (Rory McCann)

Good afternoon everybody,

I pay attention only occasionally to the talk-list, but this message
resonated in Geochicas and made me (us) feel attacked, from the tone and
expressions chosen by Frederik Ramm. Regardless of the point you try to
defend, the tone and care with the expression is a basic principle of
coexistence in a community of which permanence and renewal are so
important, as in Openstreetmap. And it sounds completely incredible to me
to read this, when so few weeks ago many were wondering (honestly?) how to
increase the diversity of participation on the board (and we have the same
concern for Openstreetmap in general). As Geochicas, we have participated
on Twitter in this collective reflection, where it seemed to me that few
people really wanted to understand the reasons why few women participate
and apply for activities such as being a board member. As if it will only
be about inviting and convincing. We are precisely in the presence of an
expression of the problem: a frankly demotivating tone to enter this type
of dialogue. And I find it especially serious that this occurs in a circle
of (ex, present and future) members of the board.

There is a code of conduct in OSM, it is surprising to remember it by now.
When looking for it in other no less serious circumstances, I could see
that it exists in a non-definitive version, which lets me understand that
it has not been a central work issue in OSM.

Given that, and the Geochicas survey demonstrates it, coexistence behaviors
in all OSM channels are a central vector of inclusion or exclusion, I
invite you, board members, to consider the Code of Conduct as a priority
OSM project : its promotion, its participatory consolidation, its
socialization, and its careful respect especially for those who are
spokespersons.

Thanks everyone
Mapeadora


El dom, 6 de dic. de 2020 a la(s) 06:21, 
escribió:

> Send talk mailing list submissions to
> talk@openstreetmap.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> talk-requ...@openstreetmap.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> talk-ow...@openstreetmap.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of talk digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re:  Please review "Community attribution advice” wiki page
>   (Joseph Eisenberg)
>2. weeklyOSM #541 2020-11-24-2020-11-30 (weeklyteam)
>3. srsly?! | Re:  I’m running for OSMF board and I’ve set up
>   office hours for questions (Rory McCann)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 10:31:32 -0800
> From: Joseph Eisenberg 
> To: Mateusz Konieczny 
> Cc: osm 
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk]  Please review "Community attribution
> advice” wiki page
> Message-ID:
>  ierfn09pbg1qu0cyxkt+e+c82lfxj...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> The text of the first section previously ended with this sentence:
>
> "To what extent you might practically get away with lesser attribution -
> either legally or socially - is outside the scope of this document."
>
> Probably such a sentence is acceptable in some cultures, but it sounds odd
> in the Anglo-American legal context so I removed it.
>
> However, perhaps there is a more polite way to say the same sort of thing,
> without seeming to invite "getting away with it?"
>
> -- Joseph Eisenberg
>
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 12:36 AM Mateusz Konieczny via talk <
> talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> > One thing that is missing to me is explicit mention that it is not
> > overriding ODBL or related laws and is not adding any legal
> > requirements.
> >
> > If someone follows ODBL license or is in situation where following
> license
> > is not needed for some reason, they can legally do this.
> >
> > Maybe also mention that it is may be recommending more attribution than
> > bare minimum that is required by ODBL, so it is a safe solution that
> should
> > be also fine for any typical[1] project that is not hostile to OSM?
> >
> > [1] "typical" - especially for very small objects things gets trickier,
> > if you are making some special purpose map (tactile map for blind)
> > then attribution also needs to be adapted, if map is going to be used
> > in place where English is not understood in general you will definitely
> > need to translate attribution etc etc.
> >
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Draft_Attribution_Guideline claim
> > that smartphone has not enough space for attribution is clearly untrue.
> > But if you show OSM map on screen of size 1cm x 1 cm or similarly tiny
> > physical object then alternative attribution methods - that still comply
> > with
> > ODBL - 

Re: [Diversity-talk] Feedback - Open Gender Monologues & Gender and Diversity chat SOTM 2018

2018-08-15 Per discussione Celine Jacquin
Hi,
Finally, I wrote the diary:
- in Spanish https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mapeadora/diary/44684
- in English https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mapeadora/diary/44685

Best!



Céline Jacquin

2018-08-10 17:06 GMT-05:00 Celine Jacquin :

> Hi all,
>
> I've read the pad with gender-session results synthesized by Heather and I
> am writing a note (diary) on the Geochicas session.
>
> I can include there a more synthesized result of the activity and my
> personal vision for next steps.
> Or
> I can keep this part for a common blog we talked about.
>
> What do you think?
> What do you prefer to keep for a collective and powerful blog oriented to
> a general equity strategy in the community? Some things can also be
> repeated.
>
>
> Céline
>
>
>
> Céline Jacquin
>
> 2018-07-30 4:48 GMT-05:00 Heather Leson :
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> The Open Gender Monologues had a great chat with some tips and tactics to
>> improve participation and healthy engagement. Great to hear some positive
>> experiences too.
>>
>>
>> We also co-hosted a session at the SOTM with Geochicas plus Kate and I.
>>
>> In this session, we asked the participants to give input in how to be
>> more supportive. They made statements "I will" "We should stop" and "we
>> should start/continue". People wrote their ideas/thoughts on sticky notes
>> (in private) then we added them to the charts.
>>
>>
>> https://pads.ccc.de/WXSlyAqS8t
>>
>> Celine, Kate and I will work to blog this. Joost will be sharing with the
>> community Birds of a feather today too.
>>
>> Back to it.
>>
>> Heather
>>
>> Heather Leson
>> heatherle...@gmail.com
>> Twitter/skype: HeatherLeson
>> Blog: textontechs.com
>>
>
>
___
Diversity-talk mailing list
Code of Conduct: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Diversity/MailingList/CodeOfConduct
Contact the mods (private): diversity-talk-ow...@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetView name change

2016-11-09 Per discussione Celine Jacquin
Hi all
I know the laim vision of OSM is to axhieve a good quality mapping ,  but i
want to say that i have been exploring uses more qualitative of the
Photomapping apps OSV and Mapillary , and these tools are extremely
powerful to document projects with an ethnographic dimension. View from the
subject,  every subject,  the child,  the person with wheelchair, the
elderly, the woman in public space, the prostitute, etc.
It is ablsolutely amazing and all these people is giving their view of tbe
world in a same database.

The point is, the name could take tbe word People
PeoplesView

Best

El mié., 9 de noviembre de 2016 9:16 AM, 
escribió:

> Send talk mailing list submissions to
> talk@openstreetmap.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> talk-requ...@openstreetmap.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> talk-ow...@openstreetmap.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of talk digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: OpenStreetView name change (Michał Brzozowski)
>2. Re: OpenStreetView name change (Simon Poole)
>3. Re: OpenStreetView name change (Frank Villaro-Dixon)
>4. Re: Use policies update (Martin Koppenhoefer)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 10:10:53 +0100
> From: Michał Brzozowski 
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetView name change
> Message-ID:
> <
> caefpf59y8qxaafeswtcqsblvqqgplpahcwnd7ncjyawpyvj...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> How about StreetOpenView? ;)
> Streetscape sounds fine to me, too.
>
> 08.11.2016 16:37 "Martijn van Exel"  napisał(a):
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A few months ago, we started with OpenStreetView, the free and open
> street
> > level imagery project made 100% for OSM with apps for Android and iOS.
> > Since then, we not only have collected almost 30 kilometers of
> > coverage, but also received a lot of attention from both you and the
> press.
> > This has also led to a friendly (for now) request by a well-known company
> > with a similarly-named product :) to not use the OpenStreetView name. So
> we
> > are looking for a new name. We have some ideas already but I wanted to
> ask
> > if you had any suggestions for a new name for OSV?
> >
> > Thanks for your support and happy capturing / mapping,
> >
> > Martijn + the OpenStreetView team
> >
> > ___
> > talk mailing list
> > talk@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> >
> >
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20161109/0a65da0f/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 11:58:42 +0100
> From: Simon Poole 
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetView name change
> Message-ID: <62077355-fae0-bd10-abbc-c31a8dad8...@poole.ch>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Streetscape is totally fine, if you just want to have the same problems
> again.
>
> Rough step by step guide to finding a workable product name:
>
> - don't do it in public
>
> - don't use anything descriptive
>
> - google for the name
>
> - do an exhaustive trademark search (or rather let your fav IP counsel
> do it for you)
>
> - register the trademark in your target markets
>
> - register the domain names
>
> - launch the product
>
> Simon
>
> Am 09.11.2016 um 10:10 schrieb Michał Brzozowski:
> >
> > How about StreetOpenView? ;)
> > Streetscape sounds fine to me, too.
> >
> >
> > 08.11.2016 16:37 "Martijn van Exel" >
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A few months ago, we started with OpenStreetView, the free and
> > open street level imagery project made 100% for OSM with apps for
> > Android and iOS. Since then, we not only have collected almost
> > 30 kilometers of coverage, but also received a lot of
> > attention from both you and the press. This has also led to a
> > friendly (for now) request by a well-known company with a
> > similarly-named product :) to not use the OpenStreetView name. So
> > we are looking for a new name. We have some ideas already but I
> > wanted to ask if you had any suggestions for a new name for OSV?
> >
> > Thanks for your support and happy capturing / mapping,
> >
> > Martijn + the OpenStreetView team
> >
> >
> > ___
> > talk mailing list
> > talk@openstreetmap.org 
> >