Re: [OSM-talk-be] Zaventem internationale luchthaven
I also can't find any documentation. But I think Zaventem fits in these criteria for sure (but it's always important to be sure offcourse). Kind regards, Joren Op 28/09/12 13:28, Ben Laenen schreef: On Friday 28 September 2012 13:14:46 Marc Gemis wrote: On http://www.flosm.de/html/POI-Karte.html I noticed that Dusseldorf Schiphol have the tag aerodrome = international aeroway = aerodrome Zaventem only has aeroway = aerodrome But it might be better to contact the creator of openbusmap (see Legal Info/License) on the website and ask which criteria he is using. m. I've added aerodrome=international, but I can't find any documentation about the tag on the wiki... What are the criteria for international for example, and are there other values as well? Ben ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] bikeToWork
I just checked the site again. They haven't changed anything yet. Sander, did they reply on your message? Kind regards, Joren Op 24/09/12 16:02, Sander Deryckere schreef: On the site http://www.biketowork.be, the tiles of OSM are used, but Georges noticed that there is no mention of OSM. So I'm planning of sending them the following mail in the name of OSM Belgium: Beste, Het is duidelijk dat jullie site (http://www.biketowork.be) gebruik maakt van OpenStreetMap data, via tiles die rechtstreeks van de osm.org http://osm.org website genomen zijn. Wij danken je voor het gebruik van onze data, maar helaas is er nergens een vermelding van OpenStreetMap, terwijl dit volgens onze licentie verplicht is. Volgens de richtlijnen gegeven op osm.org/copyright/en http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright/en is het voldoende om, op een plaats waar gebruikers dit verwachten, de tekst © OpenStreetMap contributors, met een link naar http://osm.org/copyright te zetten. Mogen wij u vragen om de website aan te passen? Mvg, OpenStreetMap Belgium Is this good? Regards, Sander ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Routing view
Hi, I fixed whole province Antwerp a while ago. I'll take sometimes a look, to see if there is not a conflict in my zone. I'll also look at the minor roads, in Antwerp. Kind regards, Joren Op 25/09/12 15:04, Teddy schreef: For major roads : I fixed the rest of the unconnected roads in Belgium, and some in NL and FR. http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routinglon=5.02744lat=50.79917zoom=9overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5 I begin now for minor roads... I work first around my zone : Charleroi. You see the work for Belgium... I come back to you at 2014... If someone could also work on this project, I would be pleased... Thanks to Maarten. @+ __Teddy__ 2012/9/13 Jo winfi...@gmail.com mailto:winfi...@gmail.com 2012/9/13 Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl mailto:md...@xs4all.nl On 2012-09-13 12:10, Joren DC wrote: I fixed almost all problems in the state Antwerp. I only have 4 red dots left. Can somebody take a look at this strange situation: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routinglon=4.47035lat=51.38314zoom=16overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5 [6] I don't know how to solve it, and what happened to the roads. It is just as the OSM inspector indicated: the roads were close to eachother but not connected. In addition, De Eendracht had an extra node which made the way overlap itself. In JOSM these things are easy to fix: select the two nodes and merge them. It's now fixed. I also fixed the development tags. General use for roads that are not there yet is highway=construction and construction=living_street (or whatever tag the highway tag is going to get) I tried to fix it too and got many conflicts. You're too fast for me, Maarten :-) I must be getting old. Cheers, Polyglot ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] highway-tag per ongeluk verwijderd
Beste Jo, Dit heb ik aangepast :-). Het station en de 'veemarkt' zal een langdurig project worden en zal ik ook eens ter plaatsen moeten gaan bekijken. Groet, Joren Op 19/09/12 11:00, Jo schreef: Hallo Joren, Zou je eens naar lijnen 130 en 131 kunnen kijken. Ik heb het busstation van Lier wat meer gedetailleerd uitgewerkt, maar ik zie niet hoe bus 131 zijn weg verderzet naar het westen, nadat hij langs perron 8 gereden is. Waarschijnlijk is dat voor de andere richting, maar het is handiger als iemand ter plaatse kan gaan kijken. Wat de namen van de routes betreft, ik doe dat ook zo. Ik was het enkel vergeten te vermelden. Ook de via's moeten vaak worden omgedraaid. Groeten, Jo Op 13 september 2012 16:11 schreef Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be het volgende: Jo, Dupliceer de relatie en wissel from en to om in de kopie. Sluit de relation editor vensters. Wat is de conventie om bij 'name' te schrijven. Ik zet hier nu consistent formaat: 'De Lijn nummer from - to'. Als ik een lijn dupliceer om een route in de tegenovergestelde richting te maken, wijzig ik dus niet alleen tag 'from' en 'to', maar ook 'name'. Is dit correct? Kan dit beter? Vriendelijke groet, Joren ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Routing view
I fixed almost all problems in the state Antwerp. I only have 4 red dots left. Can somebody take a look at this strange situation: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routinglon=4.47035lat=51.38314zoom=16overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5 I don't know how to solve it, and what happened to the roads. Kind regards, Joren Op 13/09/12 11:33, Teddy schreef: I just fix connexion problems around Mons, Charleroi, Namur, Liège + Ardennes. Still to fix the north of E42. __Eddy__ 2012/9/4 Johan C osm...@gmail.com mailto:osm...@gmail.com Hi there Belgium is slowly starting to look a bit red again: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routinglon=5.02744lat=50.79917zoom=9overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5 These are all unconnected ways which will cause routing errors in any navigation device based on OSM. Is anybody willing to remove these red dots in his/her province? 2012/6/3 Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com mailto:sander...@gmail.com It looks like, in half a month, that most problems are gone now. At least almost all problems concerning routability for cars are gone, and the others are also diminishing. Thanks again for mentioning this here. We do a lot better than the UK now, and even better than some parts in Germany. Cheers, Sander 2012/5/15 Johan C osm...@gmail.com mailto:osm...@gmail.com Hi, is anyone familiar with this site: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routinglon=4.32973lat=50.82125zoom=9 showing several hundred routing problems in Belgium? ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] highway-tag per ongeluk verwijderd
Jo, Dupliceer de relatie en wissel from en to om in de kopie. Sluit de relation editor vensters. Wat is de conventie om bij 'name' te schrijven. Ik zet hier nu consistent formaat: 'De Lijn nummer from - to'. Als ik een lijn dupliceer om een route in de tegenovergestelde richting te maken, wijzig ik dus niet alleen tag 'from' en 'to', maar ook 'name'. Is dit correct? Kan dit beter? Vriendelijke groet, Joren ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] highway-tag per ongeluk verwijderd
Op 12/09/12 19:16, Jo schreef: Op 12 september 2012 17:49 schreef Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be het volgende: Hey Jo, Bedankt voor je reply! Ik was het gisteren al van plan, maar het is er niet meer van gekomen. Bedankt voor het toevoegen van busroutes! Ik heb de 555 wel ontdubbeld. We maken 1 routerelatie per richting aan. Zo is het heel duidelijk welke weg de bus volgt en welke haltes bij die richting horen. De ways hebben dan geen rollen nodig en de haltes krijgen als role 'platform'. Busroute 555 heb ik niet toegevoegd :-). Welke waren dan wel jouw werk? Ik weet het, ik kan ook in de edit history gaan kijken... Eigenlijk al de rest in Lier (90, 130, 131, 132, 550, 297, 422, 423, 425, 426, 428, 561) :p. Van de meeste heb ik een 'beginnetje' gemaakt en ben ik van plan om later uit te breiden. Als je dat ook met de andere wenst te doen, een paar tips: (In de veronderstelling dat je dat met JOSM doet) Dupliceer de relatie en wissel from en to om in de kopie. Sluit de relation editor vensters. Duid nu alle haltes en ways aan die niet bij een bepaalde richting horen aan. Als je klaar bent, dubbelklik je op de relatie voor die richting en dan op het vuilbakje. Nu kan je ze laten sorteren en dan is het meteen duidelijk of het een ononderbroken lijn vormt. Als ik dubbelklik op de relatie zie ik een hele waslijst van 'Leden'. De meeste Leden hebben 'incompleet' staan bij 'Verwijst naar'. In het 'relation editor pane' (de rechthoek waar de lijst met relaties staat aan de rechterkant) met de rechtermuisknop op de relatie klikken en dan 'download incomplete members'. Je kan er met control left click ook een paar tegelijk selecteren en het dan op 1 ervan rechts klikken. Ook zijn er een heel deel dat rol 'Forward' hebben. Moet ik mij hier iets van aantrekken? Al de 'Forward'-leden geven ook blijkbaar een melding dat 'weg niet verboden is met vorig of volgend lid van de relatie'. Volgens http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/%C3%96pnvkarte#Roles_of_the_members is dit van toepassing op éénrichtingsstraten waar de bus netjes de weg volgt (niet tegen de richting in rijdt). Dit is voor heel de rit van toepassing. Hoe kan ik de melding 'niet verbonden' wegkrijgen dan? Die pagina geeft aan hoe je het kan doen als je 1 relatie voor beide richtingen gebruikt. Mijn voorkeur gaat uit naar een relatie per richting en dan hoeven de ways geen role meer te hebben. Perfect, ik heb de 'forward'-role verwijderd. Bedankt voor je hulp! Ik waardeer het echt. Groet, Joren ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
[OSM-talk-be] highway-tag per ongeluk verwijderd
Beste, Ik heb in de voormiddag heel wat bewerkingen gedaan; Voornamelijk busroutes aangelegd door middel van relaties. Hierdoor heb ik JOSM ook wat beter leren kennen. Echter merk ik nu - nadat ik nog eens ga kijken op openstreetmap - dat ik een stuk weg volledig heb verwijderd. Aan deze weg heb ik in de voormiddag nog 2 busroutes toegevoegd. Ik vermoed dat ik deze wegclassificatie met deze bewerking heb verwijderd: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13067511 Na wat zoekwerk in de geschiedenis van elk stukje weg om te kijken welke highway-soort deze weg is, heb ik uiteindelijk de highway-tag teruggeplaatst. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13069405 en http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13069424 Tot zover denk ik dat ik mijn fout heb rechtgezet? Omdat ik soms wat Wikipedia-artikelen bewerk, heb ik gezocht naar een vergelijkbare optie om 'oudere versies' van een weg terug te plaatsen. Is dit mogelijk? Alvast bedankt, Joren ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Routing view
The problem is that it doesn't 'change appearence'. When I just drag the road to the other road, it wouldn't snap to a point ... because the target road has no node to snap to. :s I think I'm stuck right now. If you find some free time to send a link for a JOSM walkthrough (to connect roads)? Kind regards, Joren Op 5/09/12 00:12, Jo schreef: I just tried it once more. It's not needed to have node on the way you want to connect to. As soon as it 'changes appearance', you can release the mouse button. Usually you still want to remove the node you started from by selecting it and pressing 'del'. Thanks for helping out fixing the map. Jo 2012/9/5 Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be Thanks for investing your time :-). My method as I thought you meant: - I make sure there is a note on my connection point - I clicked on the unconnected road - Then clicked on the end of my selected road to select the last note - I draw a 'new' streetline from the end of the selected road to a note (I made in step 1). I found these unconnected roads by Johan C.'s link: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routinglon=5.02744lat=50.79917zoom=9overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5 Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 23:58, Jo schreef: I'll look into them in detail tomorrow. You probably did more or less what I said for Potlatch, but some nodes still need to be removed and sometimes the ways need to be concatenated (samengevoegd). Which I might have forgotten to mention. Jo 2012/9/4 Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be That will be very helpful. Thanks! What did I wrong with my edits? I'm sorry. Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 23:52, Jo schreef: I would love to tell you yes, but there are still some issues... BTW, how do you find those unconnected ways? If you like I'll create a 'screencast' (a recording of an editing session) with JOSM to show how to accomplish what you try to do. I see you are also adding bus routes. That too is a lot easier with JOSM. Jo 2012/9/4 Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be To be sure: am I doing it right? http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/D!zzy/edits http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/D%21zzy/edits I wouldn't like to mess things up :-). Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 22:55, Jo schreef: OK, I tried it. You select the end node which gives you a red dashed line, move it over the node and the nodes of the target way become blue. My advice though: get used to the more powerful tool in the box. It's worth it later on. Jo 2012/9/4 Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be Jo, I'm sorry, I use Potlatch 2. But I installed JOSM a while ago. I'll try it with JOSM, but I'm not that familiar with JOSM. Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 22:44, Jo schreef: Which editor are you using? With JOSM you select the endnode first, then the node you want to connect it to, while holding Ctrl of Shift, then m for merge. In Potlatch I'm not sure. Somebody else will surely will be able to help you with that one. Jo 2012/9/4 Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be Sure! But I have a question about this topic: when I try to connect the road by dragging its end to the connection point, it doesn't snap to the other road... How to let it snap? Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 22:17, Johan C schreef: Hi there Belgium is slowly starting to look a bit red again: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routinglon=5.02744lat=50.79917zoom=9overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5 These are all unconnected ways which will cause routing errors in any navigation device based on OSM. Is anybody willing to remove these red dots in his/her province? 2012/6/3 Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com mailto:sander...@gmail.com It looks like, in half a month, that most
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Routing view
To be sure: am I doing it right? http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/D!zzy/edits I wouldn't like to mess things up :-). Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 22:55, Jo schreef: OK, I tried it. You select the end node which gives you a red dashed line, move it over the node and the nodes of the target way become blue. My advice though: get used to the more powerful tool in the box. It's worth it later on. Jo 2012/9/4 Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be Jo, I'm sorry, I use Potlatch 2. But I installed JOSM a while ago. I'll try it with JOSM, but I'm not that familiar with JOSM. Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 22:44, Jo schreef: Which editor are you using? With JOSM you select the endnode first, then the node you want to connect it to, while holding Ctrl of Shift, then m for merge. In Potlatch I'm not sure. Somebody else will surely will be able to help you with that one. Jo 2012/9/4 Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be Sure! But I have a question about this topic: when I try to connect the road by dragging its end to the connection point, it doesn't snap to the other road... How to let it snap? Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 22:17, Johan C schreef: Hi there Belgium is slowly starting to look a bit red again: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routinglon=5.02744lat=50.79917zoom=9overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5 These are all unconnected ways which will cause routing errors in any navigation device based on OSM. Is anybody willing to remove these red dots in his/her province? 2012/6/3 Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com mailto:sander...@gmail.com It looks like, in half a month, that most problems are gone now. At least almost all problems concerning routability for cars are gone, and the others are also diminishing. Thanks again for mentioning this here. We do a lot better than the UK now, and even better than some parts in Germany. Cheers, Sander 2012/5/15 Johan C osm...@gmail.com mailto:osm...@gmail.com Hi, is anyone familiar with this site: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routinglon=4.32973lat=50.82125zoom=9 showing several hundred routing problems in Belgium? ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Routing view
That will be very helpful. Thanks! What did I wrong with my edits? I'm sorry. Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 23:52, Jo schreef: I would love to tell you yes, but there are still some issues... BTW, how do you find those unconnected ways? If you like I'll create a 'screencast' (a recording of an editing session) with JOSM to show how to accomplish what you try to do. I see you are also adding bus routes. That too is a lot easier with JOSM. Jo 2012/9/4 Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be To be sure: am I doing it right? http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/D!zzy/edits http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/D%21zzy/edits I wouldn't like to mess things up :-). Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 22:55, Jo schreef: OK, I tried it. You select the end node which gives you a red dashed line, move it over the node and the nodes of the target way become blue. My advice though: get used to the more powerful tool in the box. It's worth it later on. Jo 2012/9/4 Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be Jo, I'm sorry, I use Potlatch 2. But I installed JOSM a while ago. I'll try it with JOSM, but I'm not that familiar with JOSM. Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 22:44, Jo schreef: Which editor are you using? With JOSM you select the endnode first, then the node you want to connect it to, while holding Ctrl of Shift, then m for merge. In Potlatch I'm not sure. Somebody else will surely will be able to help you with that one. Jo 2012/9/4 Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be Sure! But I have a question about this topic: when I try to connect the road by dragging its end to the connection point, it doesn't snap to the other road... How to let it snap? Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 22:17, Johan C schreef: Hi there Belgium is slowly starting to look a bit red again: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routinglon=5.02744lat=50.79917zoom=9overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5 These are all unconnected ways which will cause routing errors in any navigation device based on OSM. Is anybody willing to remove these red dots in his/her province? 2012/6/3 Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com mailto:sander...@gmail.com It looks like, in half a month, that most problems are gone now. At least almost all problems concerning routability for cars are gone, and the others are also diminishing. Thanks again for mentioning this here. We do a lot better than the UK now, and even better than some parts in Germany. Cheers, Sander 2012/5/15 Johan C osm...@gmail.com mailto:osm...@gmail.com Hi, is anyone familiar with this site: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routinglon=4.32973lat=50.82125zoom=9 showing several hundred routing problems in Belgium? ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Routing view
Thanks for investing your time :-). My method as I thought you meant: - I make sure there is a note on my connection point - I clicked on the unconnected road - Then clicked on the end of my selected road to select the last note - I draw a 'new' streetline from the end of the selected road to a note (I made in step 1). I found these unconnected roads by Johan C.'s link: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routinglon=5.02744lat=50.79917zoom=9overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5 Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 23:58, Jo schreef: I'll look into them in detail tomorrow. You probably did more or less what I said for Potlatch, but some nodes still need to be removed and sometimes the ways need to be concatenated (samengevoegd). Which I might have forgotten to mention. Jo 2012/9/4 Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be That will be very helpful. Thanks! What did I wrong with my edits? I'm sorry. Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 23:52, Jo schreef: I would love to tell you yes, but there are still some issues... BTW, how do you find those unconnected ways? If you like I'll create a 'screencast' (a recording of an editing session) with JOSM to show how to accomplish what you try to do. I see you are also adding bus routes. That too is a lot easier with JOSM. Jo 2012/9/4 Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be To be sure: am I doing it right? http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/D!zzy/edits http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/D%21zzy/edits I wouldn't like to mess things up :-). Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 22:55, Jo schreef: OK, I tried it. You select the end node which gives you a red dashed line, move it over the node and the nodes of the target way become blue. My advice though: get used to the more powerful tool in the box. It's worth it later on. Jo 2012/9/4 Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be Jo, I'm sorry, I use Potlatch 2. But I installed JOSM a while ago. I'll try it with JOSM, but I'm not that familiar with JOSM. Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 22:44, Jo schreef: Which editor are you using? With JOSM you select the endnode first, then the node you want to connect it to, while holding Ctrl of Shift, then m for merge. In Potlatch I'm not sure. Somebody else will surely will be able to help you with that one. Jo 2012/9/4 Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be Sure! But I have a question about this topic: when I try to connect the road by dragging its end to the connection point, it doesn't snap to the other road... How to let it snap? Kind regards, Joren Op 4/09/12 22:17, Johan C schreef: Hi there Belgium is slowly starting to look a bit red again: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routinglon=5.02744lat=50.79917zoom=9overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5 These are all unconnected ways which will cause routing errors in any navigation device based on OSM. Is anybody willing to remove these red dots in his/her province? 2012/6/3 Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com mailto:sander...@gmail.com It looks like, in half a month, that most problems are gone now. At least almost all problems concerning routability for cars are gone, and the others are also diminishing. Thanks again for mentioning this here. We do a lot better than the UK now, and even better than some parts in Germany. Cheers, Sander 2012/5/15 Johan C osm...@gmail.com mailto:osm...@gmail.com Hi, is anyone familiar with this site: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routinglon=4.32973lat=50.82125zoom=9 showing several hundred routing problems in Belgium? ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Missing Maxspeed in Brussels
Op 3/08/12 07:40, Maarten Deen schreef: On 2012-08-02 23:37, eMerzh wrote: Hello everybody .. i was playing a bit with the OSM routing machine at http://map.project-osrm.org/ , one of the best router based on osm. I discovered that a lot of routing decisions where not optimal and i found that the lack of maxspeed was often the cause of it. When a way is tagged as primary it assume that you can do 120 km/h or smth... if you can only do 50, you can imagine the difference :) So i've also played with another tool , postgis :p and i've created a quick and dirty missing maxspeed page for brussels (Sorry my machine isn't fast enough to import more :-( ) : http://osm.bmaron.net/maxspeed/ (warning it can be heavy to access ... sorry ) If you are bored because you are on vacation and it's raining, why not helping me correct all of those :) You can also use the ITO map service. It shows streets with a speed limit: http://www.itoworld.com/map/124#fullscreenlat=50.849027977811666lon=4.333080944270688zoom=14 What is the update rate of this kind of map? Maarten ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be Joren ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-be] Missing Maxspeed in Brussels
Thanks Georges. I made some big changes in my area yesterday (14:00); According to the wiki it will update every day at 17:00 for the past day. No changes seen so far. I'll wait a bit longer, because this map is very useful in order to keep an overview of the missing speed limits. I'm experimenting with JOSM and trying to make a 'speed limit'-layer if possible. Greetz, Joren Op 6/08/12 20:10, Georges De Gruyter schreef: According to this wiki, there is a daily update. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ITO_Map#Data_updates Georges 2012/8/6 Joren DC joren.libreoff...@telenet.be mailto:joren.libreoff...@telenet.be What is the update rate of this kind of map? Joren ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
