Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ nationalparksboundaries
Thanks, I have to remove my old Mt. Apo National Park data. murlwe <-Original Message-> >From: maning sambale [emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com] >Sent: 7/2/2009 9:23:29 AM >To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ nationalparksboundaries > >It's done! > >http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1705598 > >@ noel, Mount Kanlaon is included >http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121643 >@ edwaypointsdotph, Lake Balinsasayao is also included >http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121637 >@ murlwe, Moutn Apo is included >http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121639 as well as a >multiploygon relation to exclude PNOC >http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/165773 > >On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:07 AM, maning >sambale wrote: >> Last call for any comments on the planned national park/protected area >> boundaries. Anyone? >> >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM, maning >> sambale wrote: >>> Fineprint: >>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines >>> Restriction: No restriction of use >>> Date: 12/08/00 >>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine Biodiversity >Conservation >>> Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000 >>> Scale: 1:7,500,000 >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Marloue >Pidor wrote: Maning, Where did you get this data I just want to know the sections of the >Mt. Apo National Park. Based on RA 9237 Mt. Apo National Park have 3 >section that includes the north-west and south-east buffer zones. Based on the shape file, it is already merged. murlwe <-Original Message-> >From: maning sambale [emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com] >Sent: 6/14/2009 3:27:21 PM >To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national > parksboundaries > >Hi, > >Here is the protected area shapefile I intend to upload in OSM. I >removed some PAs whom I think has "improper" polygon boundaries. > >Please review if you think this is suitable for OSM import. >Download link: > http://esambale.wikispaces.com/file/view/protected_areas_edited.zip > > >On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, maning >sambale wrote: >>> Is it Mount Kanlaon National Park included? If we >include those >national park it would be much interesting for those who who use >OSM for >biodiversity conservation. >> Not sure, but I think it is. Right, in some areas there are >no road >> data simply because the are not much road in the first >place. It >> would be good for other data users (like conservationist) >to be able >> to use the data for their purpose. Some important features >I dream of >> adding: >> 1. rivers >> 2. landcover (different from landuse) >> 3. coral reefs >> >> This can be mapped using landsat by the way. >> >> >>> thanks. >> > noel >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:33 AM, maning >> sambale wrote: >>> Not good enough: >>> >http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3595795759_20a6a76358_o.png >>> >>> It seems small protected areas were marked as large >squares just to >>> appear on the 1:7M scale map. >>> Still other boundaries are good. Need to edit first, >before import. >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, maning sambale >>> wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar > wrote: > Should we add them? Why not? OK, I will send a sample file for everyone to look >at before adding >them. I'm thinking of including additional tag, for example: name=Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park boundary=national_park NIPAS:category=natural park # this link for ref: >http://sunsite.nus.edu.sg/apcel/dbase/filipino/primary/phanip.html source=PBCPP, 2002 # this is the actual source of >publication Is this OK, or any better tag for this? > I think these are the same shapefiles that >Microsoft Encarta >used in its > Atlas component and the same ones imported into >Google Maps/Map >Maker. For > instance look at the following Google Maps links: > > Biak-na-Bato National Park: > >http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=15.11853,121.087189&spn=0.082363 ,0.175781&z=13 We have way better boundary of Biak na Bato: >http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.1417&lon=121.099&zoom=13&layer s=B000FTF (I know because I stayed there for a few years) > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:33 PM, maning sambale > > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I found this in my gis database: >> >> 123pas_ini_unproc.shp Unproclaimed >protected areas as initial >> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial >and inland >water prior
Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national parksboundaries
Documentation is here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Philippines/Data_import#National_parks_and_protected_Areas On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:21 AM, maning sambale wrote: > It's done! > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1705598 > > @ noel, Mount Kanlaon is included > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121643 > @ edwaypointsdotph, Lake Balinsasayao is also included > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121637 > @ murlwe, Moutn Apo is included > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121639 as well as a > multiploygon relation to exclude PNOC > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/165773 > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:07 AM, maning > sambale wrote: >> Last call for any comments on the planned national park/protected area >> boundaries. Anyone? >> >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM, maning >> sambale wrote: >>> Fineprint: >>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines >>> Restriction: No restriction of use >>> Date: 12/08/00 >>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine Biodiversity >>> Conservation >>> Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000 >>> Scale: 1:7,500,000 >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Marloue Pidor >>> wrote: Maning, Where did you get this data I just want to know the sections of the Mt. Apo National Park. Based on RA 9237 Mt. Apo National Park have 3 section that includes the north-west and south-east buffer zones. Based on the shape file, it is already merged. murlwe <-Original Message-> >From: maning sambale [emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com] >Sent: 6/14/2009 3:27:21 PM >To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national > parksboundaries > >Hi, > >Here is the protected area shapefile I intend to upload in OSM. I >removed some PAs whom I think has "improper" polygon boundaries. > >Please review if you think this is suitable for OSM import. >Download link: > http://esambale.wikispaces.com/file/view/protected_areas_edited.zip > > >On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, maning >sambale wrote: >>> Is it Mount Kanlaon National Park included? If we include those >national park it would be much interesting for those who who use OSM for >biodiversity conservation. >> Not sure, but I think it is. Right, in some areas there are no road >> data simply because the are not much road in the first place. It >> would be good for other data users (like conservationist) to be able >> to use the data for their purpose. Some important features I dream of >> adding: >> 1. rivers >> 2. landcover (different from landuse) >> 3. coral reefs >> >> This can be mapped using landsat by the way. >> >> >>> thanks. >> > noel >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:33 AM, maning >> sambale wrote: >>> Not good enough: >>> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3595795759_20a6a76358_o.png >>> >>> It seems small protected areas were marked as large squares just to >>> appear on the 1:7M scale map. >>> Still other boundaries are good. Need to edit first, before import. >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, maning sambale >>> wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar > wrote: > Should we add them? Why not? OK, I will send a sample file for everyone to look at before adding >them. I'm thinking of including additional tag, for example: name=Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park boundary=national_park NIPAS:category=natural park # this link for ref: http://sunsite.nus.edu.sg/apcel/dbase/filipino/primary/phanip.html source=PBCPP, 2002 # this is the actual source of publication Is this OK, or any better tag for this? > I think these are the same shapefiles that Microsoft Encarta >used in its > Atlas component and the same ones imported into Google Maps/Map >Maker. For > instance look at the following Google Maps links: > > Biak-na-Bato National Park: > >http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=15.11853,121.087189&spn=0.082363,0.175781&z=13 We have way better boundary of Biak na Bato: >http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.1417&lon=121.099&zoom=13&layers=B000FTF (I know because I stayed there for a few years) > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:33 PM, maning sambale > > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I found this in my gis database: >> >> 123pas_ini_unproc.shp Unproclaimed protected areas as initial >> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland >water priority >> areas. >> >> 2pas_unproc_addl.shp Unproclaimed Protected areas as addition
Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national parksboundaries
It's done! http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1705598 @ noel, Mount Kanlaon is included http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121643 @ edwaypointsdotph, Lake Balinsasayao is also included http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121637 @ murlwe, Moutn Apo is included http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121639 as well as a multiploygon relation to exclude PNOC http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/165773 On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:07 AM, maning sambale wrote: > Last call for any comments on the planned national park/protected area > boundaries. Anyone? > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM, maning > sambale wrote: >> Fineprint: >> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines >> Restriction: No restriction of use >> Date: 12/08/00 >> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine Biodiversity >> Conservation >> Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000 >> Scale: 1:7,500,000 >> >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Marloue Pidor >> wrote: >>> Maning, >>> >>> Where did you get this data I just want to know the sections of the Mt. Apo >>> National Park. Based on RA 9237 Mt. Apo National Park have 3 section that >>> includes the north-west and south-east buffer zones. Based on the shape >>> file, it is already merged. >>> >>> >>> murlwe >>> <-Original Message-> From: maning sambale [emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com] Sent: 6/14/2009 3:27:21 PM To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national parksboundaries Hi, Here is the protected area shapefile I intend to upload in OSM. I removed some PAs whom I think has "improper" polygon boundaries. Please review if you think this is suitable for OSM import. Download link: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/file/view/protected_areas_edited.zip On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, maning sambale wrote: >> Is it Mount Kanlaon National Park included? If we include those national park it would be much interesting for those who who use OSM for biodiversity conservation. > Not sure, but I think it is. Right, in some areas there are no road > data simply because the are not much road in the first place. It > would be good for other data users (like conservationist) to be able > to use the data for their purpose. Some important features I dream of > adding: > 1. rivers > 2. landcover (different from landuse) > 3. coral reefs > > This can be mapped using landsat by the way. > > >> thanks. > > noel > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:33 AM, maning > sambale wrote: >> Not good enough: >> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3595795759_20a6a76358_o.png >> >> It seems small protected areas were marked as large squares just to >> appear on the 1:7M scale map. >> Still other boundaries are good. Need to edit first, before import. >> >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, maning sambale >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: Should we add them? Why not? >>> OK, I will send a sample file for everyone to look at before adding them. >>> >>> I'm thinking of including additional tag, for example: >>> >>> name=Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park >>> boundary=national_park >>> NIPAS:category=natural park # this link for ref: >>> http://sunsite.nus.edu.sg/apcel/dbase/filipino/primary/phanip.html >>> source=PBCPP, 2002 # this is the actual source of publication >>> >>> Is this OK, or any better tag for this? >>> >>> I think these are the same shapefiles that Microsoft Encarta used in its Atlas component and the same ones imported into Google Maps/Map Maker. For instance look at the following Google Maps links: Biak-na-Bato National Park: http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=15.11853,121.087189&spn=0.082363,0.175781&z=13 >>> >>> We have way better boundary of Biak na Bato: >>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.1417&lon=121.099&zoom=13&layers=B000FTF >>> (I know because I stayed there for a few years) >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:33 PM, maning sambale wrote: > > Hi, > > I found this in my gis database: > > 123pas_ini_unproc.shp Unproclaimed protected areas as initial > components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland water priority > areas. > > 2pas_unproc_addl.shp Unproclaimed Protected areas as additional > components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland water priority > areas. > > 36pa_iniunproc_ver.shp Unproclaimed protected areas > with boundaries for verification as initial components vis-a-vis > integrated terrestrial and inland water priority areas. > >
Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national parksboundaries
Last call for any comments on the planned national park/protected area boundaries. Anyone? On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM, maning sambale wrote: > Fineprint: > Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines > Restriction: No restriction of use > Date: 12/08/00 > Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine Biodiversity > Conservation > Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000 > Scale: 1:7,500,000 > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Marloue Pidor > wrote: >> Maning, >> >> Where did you get this data I just want to know the sections of the Mt. Apo >> National Park. Based on RA 9237 Mt. Apo National Park have 3 section that >> includes the north-west and south-east buffer zones. Based on the shape >> file, it is already merged. >> >> >> murlwe >> <-Original Message-> >>>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com] >>>Sent: 6/14/2009 3:27:21 PM >>>To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org >>>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national >>> parksboundaries >>> >>>Hi, >>> >>>Here is the protected area shapefile I intend to upload in OSM. I >>>removed some PAs whom I think has "improper" polygon boundaries. >>> >>>Please review if you think this is suitable for OSM import. >>>Download link: >>> http://esambale.wikispaces.com/file/view/protected_areas_edited.zip >>> >>> >>>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, maning >>>sambale wrote: > Is it Mount Kanlaon National Park included? If we include those >>>national park it would be much interesting for those who who use OSM for >>>biodiversity conservation. Not sure, but I think it is. Right, in some areas there are no road data simply because the are not much road in the first place. It would be good for other data users (like conservationist) to be able to use the data for their purpose. Some important features I dream of adding: 1. rivers 2. landcover (different from landuse) 3. coral reefs This can be mapped using landsat by the way. > thanks. > noel On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:33 AM, maning sambale wrote: > Not good enough: > http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3595795759_20a6a76358_o.png > > It seems small protected areas were marked as large squares just to > appear on the 1:7M scale map. > Still other boundaries are good. Need to edit first, before import. > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, maning sambale > wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar >>> wrote: >>> Should we add them? Why not? >> OK, I will send a sample file for everyone to look at before adding >>>them. >> >> I'm thinking of including additional tag, for example: >> >> name=Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park >> boundary=national_park >> NIPAS:category=natural park # this link for ref: >> http://sunsite.nus.edu.sg/apcel/dbase/filipino/primary/phanip.html >> source=PBCPP, 2002 # this is the actual source of publication >> >> Is this OK, or any better tag for this? >> >> >>> I think these are the same shapefiles that Microsoft Encarta >>>used in its >>> Atlas component and the same ones imported into Google Maps/Map >>>Maker. For >>> instance look at the following Google Maps links: >>> >>> Biak-na-Bato National Park: >>> >>>http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=15.11853,121.087189&spn=0.082363,0.175781&z=13 >> >> We have way better boundary of Biak na Bato: >> >>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.1417&lon=121.099&zoom=13&layers=B000FTF >> (I know because I stayed there for a few years) >> >> >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:33 PM, maning sambale >>> >>> wrote: Hi, I found this in my gis database: 123pas_ini_unproc.shp Unproclaimed protected areas as initial components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland >>>water priority areas. 2pas_unproc_addl.shp Unproclaimed Protected areas as additional components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland >>>water priority areas. 36pa_iniunproc_ver.shp Unproclaimed protected areas with boundaries for verification as initial components >>>vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland water priority areas. 83pas_proc.shp Proclaimed protected areas vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial and inland water priority areas. Fineprint: Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines Restriction: No restriction of use Date: 12/08/00 Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine >>>Biodiversity Conservation Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000 Scale: 1:7,500,000 Should we add them? FYI, we have 1 national park boundary >>>added already: >>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.126&lon=121.124&zoom=11&l
Re: [talk-ph] RFC: additional tags for amenity=banks
I think that sounds excellent. The tagging scheme is applicable globally and to not just banks but any retail activity. Mike At 03:37 AM 29/06/2009, maning sambale wrote: >Hi, > >I would like to propose the following additional tags for bank POIs: > >amenity=bank >name=Bank of the Philippines Islands >short_name=BPI >branch=Katipunan > >If its OK with the group, I can do a bulk edit adding the short_name >for several banks like BPI, BDO, etc. > >Disclosure: I want to declutter bank names in my Garmin GPS map to >something like "BPI (Katipunan)" instead of the usual name. > >-- >cheers, >maning ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
