Re: [Talk-transit] Help with bus route consisting of a round trip

2019-03-23 Thread David Suárez 
This would be great. Indeed, I find the sort button very useful, but
sometimes, even when stops and segments are in the relation, the sort
button makes its job, but it reverses the order of the segments, so I
have needed to manually fix the route. However, I am still not sure if
it was my fault, because I forgot to set something before using the
button, or if it is doing its job right and the wrong result was due to
a problem with the elements in the relation. :'-(

David

El 22/03/19 a las 0:32, Jo escribió:
> This summer it will see an additional improvement for routes with
> loops/spoons if the GSoC project gets accepted.
>
> Jo
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 12:10 AM seirra  > wrote:
>
> (replied to using a backup because my other email is currently
> down) I find the automatic sort button in the relations editor is
> a great tool for mapping routes
>
> On 3/19/19 1:55 AM, David Suárez wrote:
>>
>> Oh, I couldn't find the problem, but I will keep working on
>> improving other routes. I hope to become more skillful in a
>> couple of months.
>>
>> Thanks again,
>> David
>>
>> El 18/03/19 a las 19:10, Jo escribió:
>>> I removed two ways from the relation. One where there are 2
>>> parallel ones, but only one of those can serve that stop. The
>>> other was a part that I deleted as well. It was probably the
>>> result from a split that went bad.
>>>
>>> Jo
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:05 AM David Suárez
>>> mailto:serp...@apuntia.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, I'm using it, but I am just beginning. If you don't
>>> mind, I would ask you what was the problem? I could swear
>>> there was no segment missing.
>>>
>>> Gracias,
>>> David
>>>
>>> El 18/03/19 a las 17:22, Jo escribió:
 Hola David,

 Now it's continuous. Do you know about the PT_Assistant plugin?

 Jo

 On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:57 PM David Suárez
 mailto:serp...@apuntia.com>> wrote:

 Hello,

 I am trying to improve public transport route in my
 city following the
 PTv2 scheme. However, I get a validation warning
 regarding the existence
 of a gap. I checked all the way segments but I cannot
 find any issue,
 except for a couple of segments which appear in the
 wrong direction when
 using the relation editor in JOSM. Nonetheless, both
 segments are
 ordered correctly in the route and they are marked as
 two-way paths.
 Hence, I don't know if the validation problem is
 related to the route
 being a round trip or what I am missing.

 This is the route:
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9402608 and
 the problematic segments seem to be:
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499715621 and
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96613480


 Thank you for your help,
 David



 ___
 Talk-transit mailing list
 Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
 
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit


 ___
 Talk-transit mailing list
 Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org 
 
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>> ___
>>> Talk-transit mailing list
>>> Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
>>> 
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Talk-transit mailing list
>>> Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org 
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-transit mailing list
>> Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org 
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
> ___
> Talk-transit mailing list
> Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org 
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
>
> ___
> Talk-transit mailing list
> Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit

Re: [Talk-transit] Help with bus route consisting of a round trip

2019-03-22 Thread Jo 
This summer it will see an additional improvement for routes with
loops/spoons if the GSoC project gets accepted.

Jo

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 12:10 AM seirra  wrote:

> (replied to using a backup because my other email is currently down) I
> find the automatic sort button in the relations editor is a great tool for
> mapping routes
> On 3/19/19 1:55 AM, David Suárez wrote:
>
> Oh, I couldn't find the problem, but I will keep working on improving
> other routes. I hope to become more skillful in a couple of months.
>
> Thanks again,
> David
> El 18/03/19 a las 19:10, Jo escribió:
>
> I removed two ways from the relation. One where there are 2 parallel ones,
> but only one of those can serve that stop. The other was a part that I
> deleted as well. It was probably the result from a split that went bad.
>
> Jo
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:05 AM David Suárez  wrote:
>
>> Yes, I'm using it, but I am just beginning. If you don't mind, I would
>> ask you what was the problem? I could swear there was no segment missing.
>>
>> Gracias,
>> David
>> El 18/03/19 a las 17:22, Jo escribió:
>>
>> Hola David,
>>
>> Now it's continuous. Do you know about the PT_Assistant plugin?
>>
>> Jo
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:57 PM David Suárez 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am trying to improve public transport route in my city following the
>>> PTv2 scheme. However, I get a validation warning regarding the existence
>>> of a gap. I checked all the way segments but I cannot find any issue,
>>> except for a couple of segments which appear in the wrong direction when
>>> using the relation editor in JOSM. Nonetheless, both segments are
>>> ordered correctly in the route and they are marked as two-way paths.
>>> Hence, I don't know if the validation problem is related to the route
>>> being a round trip or what I am missing.
>>>
>>> This is the route: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9402608 and
>>> the problematic segments seem to be:
>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499715621 and
>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96613480
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your help,
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Talk-transit mailing list
>>> Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-transit mailing 
>> listTalk-transit@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-transit mailing list
>> Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>
>
> ___
> Talk-transit mailing 
> listTalk-transit@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
>
> ___
> Talk-transit mailing 
> listTalk-transit@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
> ___
> Talk-transit mailing list
> Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit

Re: [Talk-transit] Help with bus route consisting of a round trip

2019-03-18 Thread Jo 
I removed two ways from the relation. One where there are 2 parallel ones,
but only one of those can serve that stop. The other was a part that I
deleted as well. It was probably the result from a split that went bad.

Jo

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:05 AM David Suárez  wrote:

> Yes, I'm using it, but I am just beginning. If you don't mind, I would ask
> you what was the problem? I could swear there was no segment missing.
>
> Gracias,
> David
> El 18/03/19 a las 17:22, Jo escribió:
>
> Hola David,
>
> Now it's continuous. Do you know about the PT_Assistant plugin?
>
> Jo
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:57 PM David Suárez  wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to improve public transport route in my city following the
>> PTv2 scheme. However, I get a validation warning regarding the existence
>> of a gap. I checked all the way segments but I cannot find any issue,
>> except for a couple of segments which appear in the wrong direction when
>> using the relation editor in JOSM. Nonetheless, both segments are
>> ordered correctly in the route and they are marked as two-way paths.
>> Hence, I don't know if the validation problem is related to the route
>> being a round trip or what I am missing.
>>
>> This is the route: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9402608 and
>> the problematic segments seem to be:
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499715621 and
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96613480
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your help,
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-transit mailing list
>> Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>
>
> ___
> Talk-transit mailing 
> listTalk-transit@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
> ___
> Talk-transit mailing list
> Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit

Re: [Talk-transit] Help with bus route consisting of a round trip

2019-03-18 Thread David Suárez 
Yes, I'm using it, but I am just beginning. If you don't mind, I would
ask you what was the problem? I could swear there was no segment missing.

Gracias,
David

El 18/03/19 a las 17:22, Jo escribió:
> Hola David,
>
> Now it's continuous. Do you know about the PT_Assistant plugin?
>
> Jo
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:57 PM David Suárez  > wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to improve public transport route in my city following the
> PTv2 scheme. However, I get a validation warning regarding the
> existence
> of a gap. I checked all the way segments but I cannot find any issue,
> except for a couple of segments which appear in the wrong
> direction when
> using the relation editor in JOSM. Nonetheless, both segments are
> ordered correctly in the route and they are marked as two-way paths.
> Hence, I don't know if the validation problem is related to the route
> being a round trip or what I am missing.
>
> This is the route: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9402608 and
> the problematic segments seem to be:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499715621 and
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96613480
>
>
> Thank you for your help,
> David
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-transit mailing list
> Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org 
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
>
> ___
> Talk-transit mailing list
> Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit

Re: [Talk-transit] Help with bus route consisting of a round trip

2019-03-18 Thread Jo 
Hola David,

Now it's continuous. Do you know about the PT_Assistant plugin?

Jo

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:57 PM David Suárez  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am trying to improve public transport route in my city following the
> PTv2 scheme. However, I get a validation warning regarding the existence
> of a gap. I checked all the way segments but I cannot find any issue,
> except for a couple of segments which appear in the wrong direction when
> using the relation editor in JOSM. Nonetheless, both segments are
> ordered correctly in the route and they are marked as two-way paths.
> Hence, I don't know if the validation problem is related to the route
> being a round trip or what I am missing.
>
> This is the route: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9402608 and
> the problematic segments seem to be:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499715621 and
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96613480
>
>
> Thank you for your help,
> David
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-transit mailing list
> Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit