Re: [Talk-us] [Talk-us-newyork] Interested in importing address points in New York State

2020-07-17 Thread Skyler Hawthorne
Well, it turned it to be a lot easier than I was thinking it would be! I 
reached out to the contact listed on the Clearing House web site, using the 
template in the wiki page, and he replied confirming that we have 
permission to use the data. This is the text of the email exchange, and 
I've also attached the raw .eml file.


From: Winters, Frank (ITS) frank.wint...@its.ny.gov
Date: July 17, 2020 22:30:24
Subject: RE: Interested in importing the Address Point data from the 
Clearing House into OpenStreetMap

To: Skyler Hawthorne o...@dead10ck.com
CC: Coryell, Rodger (ITS) rodger.cory...@its.ny.gov, Fargione, Craig (ITS) 
craig.fargi...@its.ny.gov


Hi Skyler, nice to hear form you. We would very much like the SAM address 
points to be included in Open Street Map. The permitted use of the points 
is quite simple. You may use the points for any lawful purpose. While we do 
our best to maintain a comprehensive and accurate set of address points 
with our limited resources we know it has shortcomings. See the metadata 
for the liability disclaimer.


We generally post quarterly updates to the data set.


Frank Winters
Geographic Information Officer

Office of Information Technology Services
W. Averell Harriman State Office Campus
Bldg. 5 - Floor 1
Albany, NY 12226
518.242.5036 | 518.281.9140 m | frank.wint...@its.ny.gov


-Original Message-
From: Skyler Hawthorne  Sent: Friday, July 17, 2020 6:30 PM
To: Winters, Frank (ITS) 
Subject: Interested in importing the Address Point data from the Clearing 
House into OpenStreetMap


ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments 
or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails.


Hello Mr Winters,

Thank you for your part in making the GIS data for New York State available 
to the public through the Clearing House project!


I am a contributor to the OpenStreetMap project [1], a collaborative open 
project to create a global geodata set freely usable by anyone [2].


We respect the IP rights of others and I write to ask if we can use this 
data. There does not appear to be any explicit information about the 
license under which the data sets in the Cleaning House web site are 
distributed. It's unclear what the terms are for its use, and specifically 
whether or not it is public domain, and if it is permitted to import into 
the OpenStreetMap project and redistribute to the world under an open license.


At the most simple, I would seek a statement like this:

"The New York State GIS Program Office [or the relevant NYS department(s)] 
has no objections to geodata derived in part from the GIS Clearing House 
data sets being incorporated into the OpenStreetMap project geodata 
database and released under a free and open license" [1]


I also ask that whatever statement you are prepared to make can be made 
public for information purposes.


Below is a fact sheet. If you would like any more information, I will do my 
best to help or can ask our project's License Working Group to get in touch 
with you.


Regards,
Skyler Hawthorne

Fact Sheet

[1] The OpenStreetMap project currently has over 750,000 registered 
contributors worldwide. Our main website is https://www.openstreetmap.org


[2] We are mandated to make our geodata available in perpetuity under a 
free and open licence. We are not allowed to use a commercial license, but 
commercial organisations are allowed to use our data under similar terms.


[3] Our data is currently published under the Open Database License 1.0, 
https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=76761582-2a4eb33f-7674ecb7-000babd9fa3f-f71edf933744da0d=1=391ef603-5912-439f-b6e4-b8ac749598bd=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.opendatacommons.org%2Flicenses%2Fodbl%2F


[4] Most of our geodata is contributed by individuals. However, we are very 
grateful when able to incorporate or derive from other geo-data datasets 
where license terms are compatible.


[5] We formally attribute all such sources at 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution, using any specific wording 
if you request. We also try to provide a link to this page with any extract 
of data from our database. However, for reasons of practicality, we do not 
require end-users to repeat such attribution since it runs into hundreds.


[6] We also keep a public track of third party data use at 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue and usually have a 
project page for each dataset, describing how we use it and whether there 
are any license restrictions to be aware of.


[7] If you have any specific legal questions, the OpenStreetMap 
Foundation's License Working Group can be reached at 
le...@osmfoundation.org and will be glad to help.


On July 16, 2020 12:16:19 Kevin Kenny  wrote:


(By the way, hi, Skyler, and welcome!  You've stepped into a difficult
area - most programmers don't realize just how difficult until they've
waded in.

The legal situation in New York is _very_ complicated, because the key
court case that governs GIS data 

Re: [Talk-us] Clear Creek County in Colorado has a broken county boundary

2020-07-17 Thread stevea
Taylor Smock wrote:

> https://data.colorado.gov/Transportation/Counties-in-Colorado/67vn-ijga The 
> `About` tab /claims/ that the data is Public Domain, but
> I would double check, just in case. (Some people I've talked to in county 
> governments thought public domain meant the data was
> available for the public, /not/ that the copyright status was public domain, 
> so I've learned to double check). 

Thank you for that link, Taylor.  While I am not an attorney, I am confident 
enough that when a state government adds metadata of "License:  Public Domain" 
I can discern these data are ODbL-compatible.  So I essentially re-drew OSM's 
previously-broken (significant chunks missing) polygon for Clear Creek County 
based on these data (and using the missing segment whole and unchanged).  This 
also required some massage of the data for part of the boundary shared with 
Gilpin County.  I attributed the link above in the changeset's source comment.

Especially in the area of James Peak (node/358916927), there are a number of 
boundaries here (James Peak Wilderness Area, James Peak Protection Area, Grand 
County, Continental Divide) which remain quite messy, with significant errors 
that look to be around 20 to 30 meters.  Indeed, the Continental Divide itself 
(way/385331055) is tagged FIXME=improve precision.

While I don't often publicly complain about OSM's data, thanks to this dataset 
submission to talk-us, I have noticed that a fair amount of county boundary 
data in Colorado, while extant in OSM, have serious drift and accuracy errors — 
hundreds of meters or even kilometers.  As there exist ODbL-compatible data 
which are clearly superior to OSM's current dataset, I recommend a dedicated 
editor (or team) properly import these, conflating with existing data where 
necessary (there appear to be many shared ways for edges of forest and 
wilderness boundaries).  This necessarily will be careful work, but OSM will be 
much better for it.

I don't know how extensive these sorts of data errors are in other states.  I 
stumbled down this rabbit hole while using 
http://layers.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=5=40.2=-97.5=0B000FFFTFTTTFF
 to quality-check county-boundary tagging.  There are still some oddities 
(several counties in California plus a score or so sprinkled around the lower 
48) where I still do not quite understand why they remain in apparent error, 
despite my "healing" some previously-broken boundaries.  It could be I don't 
fully understand this renderer's tiling schedule.  But while this rendering has 
improved some of those broken counties due to my improvements, some of them 
stubbornly refuse to better render, despite seeming correct (and 
correctly-tagged) polygons.  Hm.

I'm "slowly watching" this (county boundaries which appear to have decayed to 
brokenness, then repairing them), but I wanted to both share my activities more 
widely with the US OSM community, as well as thank Taylor for his quick reply 
to my request for state-issued county boundary data:  I appreciate the pointer.

SteveA
California
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] private or not, USA ?

2020-07-17 Thread Matthew Woehlke

On 16/07/2020 21.06, Steve Friedl wrote:

On 16/07/2020 20.58, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us wrote:

Are wi-fi passwords and the IP number of a hot spot, located in MC Donald, 
burger-king, Starbucks,


Answering a different question than what you asked: they don’t belong in OSM, 
so any other answer is off topic.


...and in addition, yes, they are private. Such AP's are usually for 
customers only; said establishments will likely be very annoyed if you 
go around publishing their passwords. It may even be illegal to do so.


**DO NOT** add such information to OSM.

--
Matthew

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us