Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-07 Thread Drew Dara-Abrams
Hi Vivek, Interline's OSM Extracts service generates extracts for all of
those California metro regions that you list -- all extracts are updated
daily. See https://www.interline.io/osm/extracts/ and
https://github.com/interline-io/osm-extracts/blob/master/cities.json

Hi Frederik, we see the Interline OSM Extracts service as complementary to
Geofabrik, rather than trying to compete. Our own interest is in city/metro
extracts, as our clients use these to power routing engines and other
transportation analysis applications at the regional scale. It's great to
have the comprehensive country and state coverage provided by Geofabrik.
Feel free to drop me a line anytime at d...@interline.io.

I'm a native Californian and know how contentious the intra-state divides
can be... so I'll now leave this thread :)

Drew

On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:12 PM Vivek Bansal <3viv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I told you Californians loved attention!
>
> I picked 6 Californias because I thought it was the nicest way to divide
> up the state into equally sized shapes with some reference to political
> boundaries.  I also "detest" the politics of breaking up California but I
> like the geospatial organization.
>
> I don't have an opinion where a north south line would go.
>
> That being said, (I think i'm repeating myself in a slightly different way
> i'm sorry for that) alternatively would you consider adding a few of the
> most populous regions and cities to the sub of California like you do for
> Germany?  Just as you have an extract for Brandenberg (mit Berlin) as well
> as Berlin, could you do the San Francisco Bay area as well as San
> Francisco?  To make it easy, perhaps just use similar boundaries that
> existed for Metro Extracts -
> https://github.com/mapzen/metro-extracts/blob/master/cities.json namely:
> - san-francisco-bay_california
> - san-francisco_california
> - san-jose_california
> - los-angeles_california
> - san-diego_california
>
> There must have been a demand for those regions to be added to that list
> and I think the vast majority of analyses would take place at these levels.
>
> Thanks so much!
>
> -Vivek
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 8:11 PM Tod Fitch  wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Nov 6, 2018, at 1:58 PM, OSM Volunteer stevea <
>> stevea...@softworkers.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Taken "straight across the state" (west to east), following the
>> political boundaries of "the northern edges of three counties"
>> (admin_level=6) to break up a state (admin_level=4), it's both easy
>> (technically, simply "10 counties out of 58" or "northern edges of three
>> counties"), agreeable by many, a political reality right now, mostly
>> straight along a similar latitude line and already somewhat harmonious
>> among the relatively small sample of people here on this list who have
>> something to say about it.  (Not that we're definitive, nor am I,
>> personally).  But, look, we did come to a rough consensus on a relatively
>> simple solution rather quickly and easily.
>> >
>> > I say "we've thrown it against the wall, and it seems to stick."
>> (Though of course, more discussion is welcome).
>> >
>> > SteveA
>> > California
>>
>> +1 to this. Seems like a reasonable place to make a division to me.
>>
>> Tod
>> also in California
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-us mailing list
>> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>>
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] perceptions of OHM and other similar projects

2015-04-06 Thread Drew Dara-Abrams
Richard et al.,

Thanks for starting an interesting thread. There do seem to be an
increasing number of projects that live outside of OSM proper but that
connect loosely with OSM data and services.

By chance, I proposed a panel on this general topic for the upcoming
SOTM-US conference. My own interest comes from public-transit data (which
includes lots of temporal schedule information that doesn't belong and
doesn't fit in OSM). Sounds like there are similarities to historical map
data, and how that's handled alongside present-day OSM data.

If any of you or others are interested, I'll past the proposal blurb below.
Whether or not the panel is accept, I hope there will be enough interest
for a BoF on this topic and ways to continue this discussion among those
who attend SOTM-US in person.

Best,
Drew

--

Proposal for a panel on peripheral data for SOTM-US 2015

OpenStreetMap is a giant datastore, with an extremely flexible data model.
Its API accepts all additions. But, in fact, not everything belongs or fits
in OSM.

Some thematic data require more advanced modeling than OSM’s simple tagging
scheme supports. To represent a building in full 3D requires a data model
that supports solids, and to represent a public-transit network or traffic
patterns requires a data model that handles space and time.

Other types of data come from authoritative sources and may require
cleaning, combining, and perhaps even legal review before they’re ready to
be added to OSM. For example, street addresses and trailheads.

Just as not every kind of data can fit into OSM, not every kind of data can
easily be extracted from OSM. Storing data outside of OSM proper may also
make that data more relevant to other users’ needs. For example, supporting
data consumption in mobile apps, or supporting data collection with
topic-specific editor apps.

We’ll discuss “peripheral data” to OSM, both in terms of technical
implementation and in terms of community impacts. If done well, data
projects that are connected--but not subsumed--by OSM can advance open geo
data. Let’s figure out together how that’s best done.

proposed participants:
- OpenAddresses [Ian Dees] - street address data
- Mapillary [Jan Erik Solem] - street-front imagery
- OpenTrails [Jereme Monteau] - recreational trails
- Transitland [Drew Dara-Abrams] - public transit

--

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:

 so one of the things from recent discussion that concerns me are
 perceptions out there about projects parallel to OSM that are designed
 to complement it, specifically OHM. here is an outline of the view from
 OHM, and i'm interesting in understanding why some treat the whole
 project so dismissively (note that i'm a little bit of a late comer to OHM,
 i've been following it with interest since it started but only just
 recently
 started contributing directly.)

 OHM was created because of the perceived desire to start handling
 historic spatial data and characterize temporal aspects of it. the whole
 idea is that we accept that OSM is not a good place for this data, so
 why not create such a place?

 it's a real database, using the OSM software stack. it's live, and you
 can pan around in it and not see much because it's pretty sparse.
 but you can go see historic building footprints and addresses in
 lower manhattan right now. in fact, we just set up a list of projects
 that are going on in OHM to make it easier for folks to see what's
 up:

   http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map/Projects

 the short summary is

 1.it's real and operational
 2.there's stuff in it
 3.if you know OSM tools, you can join the party
 4.we just set up overpass for it, still tweaking it, but overlaying
interesting OHM data on OSM basemaps just got a bit easier

 a number of OHM oriented talk proposals were submitted for
 SOTM US, and some will probably make the program.

 i think the long term future of OSM will probably involve more
 OHM like projects to supplement OSM. my question is how will
 the core OSM community treat them? right now it seems very
 mixed.

 richard

 --
 rwe...@averillpark.net
  Averill Park Networking - GIS  IT Consulting
  OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
  Java - Web Applications - Search



 ___
 Talk-us mailing list
 Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us