Re: [Talk-us] ODBL for Spatial Analysis

2014-06-07 Thread William Morris
Thanks, Alex. I hadn't known about sections 4.5b and 4.5c before;
that's really helpful to have a sense of the distinction between
derivative database and produced work.

And indeed, I've worked through my city's building import
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BTV-Prints), and look forward to
continuing contributions to OSM!

-B

--
William Morris | Senior Visualization Engineer
Faraday Inc | faraday.io | (802)-458-0441 x336 | SF/VT/FR/WI


On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:

 On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:

 On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 11:40 AM, William Morris
 wboyk...@geosprocket.com wrote:
  Please let me know if I should direct this at a different list, but I
  have a basic question about the implications of the ODBL:
 
  OSM is brimming with great POIs and network features; I'd like to use
  some of these categories to answer broad questions like How far is
  this customer from the nearest park/school/whatever? Unfortunately,
  I'm not precisely sure of my legal obligation once I've answered that
  question. Specifically, would I be required to contribute the location
  of the customer back to OSM? If not, does that still hold when I
  upscale it to millions of customers?
 
  Thanks for the assistance, in any case. I know this is a somewhat
  contentious issue for the community, and I'd rather not make any
  assumptions.

 ODbL isn't contentious among OpenStreetMap contributors at all.  We've
 all agreed to ODbL as a matter of course, in getting our contributor
 accounts. Sounds like you've been mislead by somebody with a bone to
 pick.  Ignore them.  :-)

 The right mailing list for license-realted questions or discussions is
 legal-talk@[1]

 On the face of your question, I would be surprised if OpenStreetMap
 would want to know the current location of an individual.  That seems
 to fly in the face of the respect for individual privacy that
 OpenStreetMap demonstrates.  I've presumed that your customer is a
 person, as they go about their day.  That presumption could be way off
 base.

 It could go the other way, I suppose.  If your customer is a business
 or POI that isn't included in OpenStreetMap, well then, yes
 OpenStreetMap would like that data.


 For the terms of the license it doesn't matter what data is interesting for
 OpenStreetMap or not at all, but rather what licensing terms apply. If you
 create data by computation based on OpenStreetMap data you are clearly
 creating a Produced Work and the data is unencumbered by the share alike
 provisions.

 Of course, if you have awesome data for OpenStreetMap, please contribute!

 Alex






___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] ODBL for Spatial Analysis

2014-06-06 Thread Alex Barth
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:

 On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 11:40 AM, William Morris
 wboyk...@geosprocket.com wrote:
  Please let me know if I should direct this at a different list, but I
  have a basic question about the implications of the ODBL:
 
  OSM is brimming with great POIs and network features; I'd like to use
  some of these categories to answer broad questions like How far is
  this customer from the nearest park/school/whatever? Unfortunately,
  I'm not precisely sure of my legal obligation once I've answered that
  question. Specifically, would I be required to contribute the location
  of the customer back to OSM? If not, does that still hold when I
  upscale it to millions of customers?
 
  Thanks for the assistance, in any case. I know this is a somewhat
  contentious issue for the community, and I'd rather not make any
  assumptions.

 ODbL isn't contentious among OpenStreetMap contributors at all.  We've
 all agreed to ODbL as a matter of course, in getting our contributor
 accounts. Sounds like you've been mislead by somebody with a bone to
 pick.  Ignore them.  :-)

 The right mailing list for license-realted questions or discussions is
 legal-talk@[1]

 On the face of your question, I would be surprised if OpenStreetMap
 would want to know the current location of an individual.  That seems
 to fly in the face of the respect for individual privacy that
 OpenStreetMap demonstrates.  I've presumed that your customer is a
 person, as they go about their day.  That presumption could be way off
 base.

 It could go the other way, I suppose.  If your customer is a business
 or POI that isn't included in OpenStreetMap, well then, yes
 OpenStreetMap would like that data.


For the terms of the license it doesn't matter what data is interesting for
OpenStreetMap or not at all, but rather what licensing terms apply. If you
create data by computation based on OpenStreetMap data you are clearly
creating a Produced Work and the data is unencumbered by the share alike
provisions.

Of course, if you have awesome data for OpenStreetMap, please contribute!

Alex
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


Re: [Talk-us] ODBL for Spatial Analysis

2014-05-26 Thread Richard Weait
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 11:40 AM, William Morris
wboyk...@geosprocket.com wrote:
 Please let me know if I should direct this at a different list, but I
 have a basic question about the implications of the ODBL:

 OSM is brimming with great POIs and network features; I'd like to use
 some of these categories to answer broad questions like How far is
 this customer from the nearest park/school/whatever? Unfortunately,
 I'm not precisely sure of my legal obligation once I've answered that
 question. Specifically, would I be required to contribute the location
 of the customer back to OSM? If not, does that still hold when I
 upscale it to millions of customers?

 Thanks for the assistance, in any case. I know this is a somewhat
 contentious issue for the community, and I'd rather not make any
 assumptions.

ODbL isn't contentious among OpenStreetMap contributors at all.  We've
all agreed to ODbL as a matter of course, in getting our contributor
accounts. Sounds like you've been mislead by somebody with a bone to
pick.  Ignore them.  :-)

The right mailing list for license-realted questions or discussions is
legal-talk@[1]

On the face of your question, I would be surprised if OpenStreetMap
would want to know the current location of an individual.  That seems
to fly in the face of the respect for individual privacy that
OpenStreetMap demonstrates.  I've presumed that your customer is a
person, as they go about their day.  That presumption could be way off
base.

It could go the other way, I suppose.  If your customer is a business
or POI that isn't included in OpenStreetMap, well then, yes
OpenStreetMap would like that data.

But again, you should have this discussion on legal-talk@.

[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


[Talk-us] ODBL for Spatial Analysis

2014-05-24 Thread William Morris
Please let me know if I should direct this at a different list, but I
have a basic question about the implications of the ODBL:

OSM is brimming with great POIs and network features; I'd like to use
some of these categories to answer broad questions like How far is
this customer from the nearest park/school/whatever? Unfortunately,
I'm not precisely sure of my legal obligation once I've answered that
question. Specifically, would I be required to contribute the location
of the customer back to OSM? If not, does that still hold when I
upscale it to millions of customers?

Thanks for the assistance, in any case. I know this is a somewhat
contentious issue for the community, and I'd rather not make any
assumptions.

-Bill

--
William Morris | Senior Visualization Engineer
Faraday Inc | faraday.io | (802)-458-0441 x336 | SF/VT/FR/WI

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us